- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Admin tells Boasberg they are no longer playing his game
Posted on 3/26/25 at 12:23 pm to SammyTiger
Posted on 3/26/25 at 12:23 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
The privilege is properly invoked when the judge determines it protect a state secret.
are you saying that a Federal District Court Judge has the power to determine whether something is or isn't a state secret?
1
Posted on 3/26/25 at 12:25 pm to supatigah
quote:
are you saying that a Federal District Court Judge has the power to determine whether something is or isn't a state secret?
when it comes to compelling evidence in court yes.
They generally give a lot of deference to the government but they can say “that’s bullshite”
and i’m not saying it, The SCOTUS is.
This post was edited on 3/26/25 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 3/27/25 at 12:47 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
How many responses are you going to make without actually saying anything?
Your beef is with the Supreme Court, not me.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 12:50 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Your beef is with the Supreme Court, not me.
I have no problem with the Supreme Court, you clearly do.
and the answer to my question is at least 1 more.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 12:59 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
I have no problem with the Supreme Court, you clearly do.
Like playing chess against a pigeon. I’m literally citing WORD for WORD the standard the court requires.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 1:04 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Like playing chess against a pigeon. I’m literally citing WORD for WORD the standard the court requires.
I am not asking you what the judge can use to review if privilege was properly invoked.
i’m asking you what it means for privilege to be properly invoked.
and the quote you keep posting, doesn’t say that.
The fact that you don’t understand that says everything about you.
This post was edited on 3/27/25 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 3/27/25 at 1:51 pm to SammyTiger
Somehow you get the idea that the judicial branch is all powerful.The judge says this and that and that is the end of it.
The Constitution says otherwise and you don't seem to understand that.
The Constitution says otherwise and you don't seem to understand that.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:00 pm to antibarner
Sorry please point to the spot in the constitution where State Secret Privilege is inshrined.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:04 pm to stout
Alien enemies act is not subject to judicial review.
Period.
(SCOTUS is an exception because they are constitutionally created as a co-equal; these lower courts are not constitutionally created but congressionally created and thus can't review this act)
Period.
(SCOTUS is an exception because they are constitutionally created as a co-equal; these lower courts are not constitutionally created but congressionally created and thus can't review this act)
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:42 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
i’m asking you what it means for privilege to be properly invoked.
Good Lord. The judge looks at the totality of the circumstances and makes a decision. How are you not understanding this? The standard is very clear. Which is likely why the Supreme Court used the words they did. No way you’re a lawyer.
This post was edited on 3/27/25 at 2:43 pm
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:43 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
SammyTiger
quote:
BBONDS25
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:52 pm to Decatur
quote:
Flight times are state secrets now nice
And judges think they run the executive branch. Clownworld.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:54 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
which is that the information is actually a state secret
If the President classifies it to be, then it is, correct? A judge doesn't determine what a State secret is or isn't.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:59 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Ignore all of them and pardon the cabinet
They want this stuff to play out in the courts instead of just pardoning them all, imo.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 3:03 pm to Lg
quote:
If the President classifies it to be, then it is, correct? A judge doesn't determine what a State secret is or isn't.
in the context of State Secret Privilege, a judge /the Courts can call for disclosure of information that they do not believe is a genuine state secret.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 3:07 pm to stout
Piss on this judge and his kind. These terrorist are just that. And if that ain’t enough, they are also here illegally. They have NO rights to do a damn thing. That includes legal representation.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 3:10 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Good Lord. The judge looks at the totality of the circumstances and makes a decision
that’s not the answer to the question.
I asked you what it means for privilege to be properly invoked and your responses is “judges look at the totality of the circumstances”
They look at them to determine what?
The answer of course is they look at evidence available to determine if the information the government seals to withhold actually falls under the privilege.
Meaning if it’s actually a state secret.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 4:28 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
They look at them to determine what?
If they think the privilege was properly invoked. Considering a totality of the circumstances.
quote:
Meaning if it’s actually a state secret.
Nope. The Supreme Court used the words it did for a reason. Absolutely nowhere in The decision does it say what you claim. You’re wrong. Going on 3 days in a row over such a small issue. I’m impressed by your tenacity to prove over and over again you don’t understand the ruling.
This post was edited on 3/27/25 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 3/27/25 at 4:35 pm to BBONDS25
You won’t say what “properly invoked” means
This post was edited on 3/27/25 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 3/27/25 at 4:42 pm to I20goon
quote:
Alien enemies act is not subject to judicial review.
Period.
Thats not completely true. It is subject to questions regarding constitutionality . You can't just misapply the act and then hid behind that wording.
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News