Started By
Message
locked post

True or False, the money Iran got was their own money "released"

Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:27 pm
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53774 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:27 pm
I see libs running to Obama's defense...

"Obama only let Iran have their own money back since other criteria had been met in diplomacy negotiations"

I just want the truth, does anyone know what really took place?

I hate our freaking media...we don't know who is giving us straight talk.

Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67488 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:28 pm to
Partially true but frick Iran; how much money have they cost us over the years?
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:29 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 6:43 am
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24795 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:30 pm to
Never give money to terrorists either way.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:30 pm to
It is true
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
14823 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:30 pm to
To an extent, true. 150B (as some have estimated) was frozen assets. The 1.8B cash was supposedly reimbursement for a pre-revolution arms deal that was never fully executed.

But what did we really give up with the NoKo summit other than shaving off military excercises? Comparatively cheaper and as others have pointed out, we didn’t release funds to a regime that funnels that cash to potential threats.
This post was edited on 6/12/18 at 12:37 pm
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79234 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

even if it was their money, who cares?

we had it, and we gave it to them...in exchange for?
Posted by Shiftyplus1
Regret nothing that made you smile
Member since Oct 2005
13352 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:31 pm to
True, BUT we also, in addition, gave them 1.8 billion in cash.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57457 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

even if it was their money, who cares?
if it was their money, why did we have it?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64366 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:31 pm to
Yes it was their's.
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa
Member since Aug 2012
13568 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

we had it, and we gave it to them...in exchange for?


Dick. Nada. Nothing.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36051 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:32 pm to
Did we get our embassy back?
Posted by StrangeBrew
Salvation Army-Thanks Obama
Member since May 2009
18184 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:34 pm to
so they grabbed hostages at our embassy so,we grabbed their cash. Also they were building some of IED's that were used in Afghanistan and Iraq, so f them.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
41149 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:34 pm to
LINK

quote:

In November 1979, Iran’s revolutionary government took 52 Americans hostages at the U.S. embassy, and the U.S. severed diplomatic relations with Tehran. In retaliation, Washington froze $12 billion in Iranian assets held on our shores. The hostage crisis was resolved in 1981 at a conference in Algiers, and the U.S. returned $3 billion to Iran, with more funds going either to pay creditors, or into escrow. The two nations also established a tribunal in the Hague called the Iran United States Claims Tribunal to settle claims both leveled by each government against the other, U.S. citizens versus Iran, and vice versa.

The major issue between the two governments was a $400 million payment for military equipment made by the government of the Shah of Iran, prior to the 1979 uprising that topped him. The U.S. banned delivery of the jets and other weapons amid the hostage crisis, but froze the $400 million advance payment. “The Pentagon handled arms purchases from foreign countries,” says Gary Sick, a former National Security Council official who served as the principal White House aide for Iran during the Iranian Revolution and the hostage crisis. “Defense took care of the details. So the $400 million scheduled purchase was a government-to-government transaction. The U.S. government was holding the money. That’s why it was so difficult to resolve.”

By 2015, the issue stood before a panel of nine judges, including three independent jurists, who were reportedly near a decision on binding arbitration. According to Obama administration officials, the U.S. was concerned that the tribunal would mandate an award in the multiple billions of dollars. “The Iranians wanted $10 billion,” says Sick.”I estimate that the tribunal would have awarded them $4 billion. That’s what the lawyers were saying. It’s not as much as they wanted, but a lot more than we paid.”

So instead, the U.S. negotiators convinced Iran to move the dispute from arbitration to a private settlement. The two sides reached an agreement in mid-2015, at the same time as the U.S. and Iran reached a comprehensive pact on curtailing Iran’s development of nuclear weapons. The financial deal called for the U.S. to refund $1.7 billion to Tehran, consisting of the original $400 million contract for military equipment, plus $1.3 billion in interest.



It was their money. We stole it from them when they deposed the dictator we installed to prevent them from nationalizing their petroleum market.

I absolutely HATE these neocons that constantly want to beat the war drum against Iran.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53774 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

It is true


ok be specific about the truth

how much was held and who authorized it

why did we hold it in the first place

where was it held


how many billions have we given them over the last 40 years? Just take a good guess, thanks

Posted by wareaglepete
Lumon Industries
Member since Dec 2012
11002 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:36 pm to
The money/assets were seized and frozen in 1979. A large portion was returned in 1981. The remainder stayed seized and $400MM from the sale of Iranian assets was put into an escrow account.

Payment for the hostage situation in my mind.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95749 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:36 pm to
Yes and no.

Yes in that the money belonged to the Shah’s pre-revolutionary government for weapons never delivered.

No in that Iran still has not paid reparations to the US or any hostages over the hostage crisis of the late 70s.

I conflate the two and feel that the money should have been split between the government and the hostages / estates of the hostages.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:38 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 6:43 am
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54210 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:38 pm to
Yeah it was their money but giving it back to them is like giving back a drug king who has been in prison for 10 years his money back that was confiscated the day he was arrested. It's all nefarious shite going on either way.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 6/12/18 at 12:41 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 6:43 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram