- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tony Podesta offered immunity to testify against Paul Manafort!!
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:27 pm to Rebel
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:27 pm to Rebel
quote:
Let 5 go to get 1 doesn't sound like a good deal to me.
Bowe Bergdahl and Barack Obama think that’s a perfectly good deal.
This post was edited on 7/19/18 at 8:28 pm
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:36 pm to ApexTiger
Supposedly immune from being tried on the same crime. Sounds like they are letting Podesta skate free from the same crime that was commuted by manafort during 2006.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:38 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:Because Tony Podesta wasn't part of the trump campaign
I wonder why Manafort wasn’t offered immunity to testify against Tony Podesta?
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:38 pm to Bunyan
quote:
SO you admit it's a witch hunt to get Trump by any means necessary, even if his indictment/trial have nothing to do with Trump. Nice
You're a POS if you support this
You need to wake up and smell the real world.
If Mueller thinks he needs evidence of certain facts to make a relevant case against Trump, and Manafort has that evidence, convicting Manafort is a possible means to obtain that evidence. Plain and simple.
This case which ultimately involves a possible conspiracy to illegally influence a presidential election.
In highly significant cases like this, going after a guy like Manafort for an unrelated crime happens every day in the real world.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:40 pm to texridder
quote:
This case which ultimately involves a possible conspiracy to illegally influence a presidential election
There you go again with your BS fairy tale. Hillary lost because she was a POS and boogeyman Russia didn't impact the election
Mueller is a hack
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:42 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
Wow! Mueller and his team of Democrats need to be investigated pronto! They are actually using Manafort as an excuse to cover up the Podesta brothers crimes.
The entire Mueller investigation of Trump has been a smoke screen to cover up the crimes of the Obama administration.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Manafort had to launder the money or else declare it and essentially admit the FARA violations
Why not just register under FARA? Seems like a lot of unnecessary hoop jumping.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:45 pm to texridder
Why are the left so completely and utterly dense to this?
How was the election “supposedly” influenced?
Because your party was caught cheating in their own primary. You want to have justification for losing instead of being accountable for your own parties corruption. Even if you are a political party tribalist, how can you not focus your efforts on Hillary is beyond me.
How was the election “supposedly” influenced?
Because your party was caught cheating in their own primary. You want to have justification for losing instead of being accountable for your own parties corruption. Even if you are a political party tribalist, how can you not focus your efforts on Hillary is beyond me.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:45 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
so what does this mean?
Immunity from what?
And Manafort is in jail over crimes committed in 2006?
Nothing
Nothing
Yep
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:48 pm to texridder
quote:
If Mueller thinks he needs evidence of certain facts to make a relevant case against Trump, and Manafort has that evidence, convicting Manafort is a possible means to obtain that evidence. Plain and simple.
that makes no sense on multiple levels, but the easiest is: Trump can pardon Manafort. what leverage does a coviction really bring?
quote:
In highly significant cases like this, going after a guy like Manafort for an unrelated crime happens every day in the real world.
the pressure is pre-indictment
the leverage and offers decrease with each step post-indictment. doing an actual trial means deals are basically off the table
but i'm sure you have vast experience actually litigating criminal cases
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:49 pm to shinerfan
quote:
Why not just register under FARA? Seems like a lot of unnecessary hoop jumping.
well
hiding the FARA issues was one reason not to declare it
they 100% got greedy and wanted to avoid taxes
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:49 pm to texridder
quote:
If Mueller thinks he needs evidence of certain facts to make a relevant case against Trump, and Manafort has that evidence, convicting Manafort is a possible means to obtain that evidence. Plain and simple.
Wait, what?
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:51 pm to shinerfan
quote:
Why not just register under FARA? Seems like a lot of unnecessary hoop jumping.
Because most people do not register under FARA. It is one of those laws that is rarely complied with and rarely enforced.
Every single member of Congress and 75% of DC would have to register if the the law was enforced across the board.
This is why the original indictments against Manafort are so laughable.
This post was edited on 7/19/18 at 8:52 pm
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:54 pm to IllegalPete
quote:
This is why the original indictments against Manafort are so laughable.
bro
he laundered the frick out of that money
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
he laundered the frick out of that money
Yep he did. Podesta did too
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:57 pm to Bunyan
oh i agree
offering immunity to Podesta makes no sense. it's a legitimate bombshell
like i said earlier, either Meuller has a weak case or this is a political favor
offering immunity to Podesta makes no sense. it's a legitimate bombshell
like i said earlier, either Meuller has a weak case or this is a political favor
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
I am personally enjoying the melting of cruiser hog
It is As if he thinks his idiocy on this board actually means something
It is As if he thinks his idiocy on this board actually means something
Posted on 7/19/18 at 8:58 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Because Tony Podesta wasn't part of the trump campaign
What does that have to do with Manafort being charged with crimes with ZERO RELATIONS stupid idiot
Posted on 7/19/18 at 9:00 pm to Strannix
Mueller was charged with investigating the trump campaign and any crimes that came up during that investigation
He found Manafort's crimes
Keep up, sizzle chest
He found Manafort's crimes
Keep up, sizzle chest
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News