Started By
Message

re: Tommy Robinson Case

Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:10 am to
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63645 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:10 am to
I’m confident that most of us are anti-pedo, but if he’s doing something that interferes with the administration of justice, he’s not helping the cause.

He seems to be a nut because he’s one of those hysterics thatsees danger everywhere and stirs shite.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36224 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:17 am to
quote:

I’m confident that most of us are anti-pedo, but if he’s doing something that interferes with the administration of justice, he’s not helping the cause. 

This has nothing to do with the administration of justice. We sequester juries in this country, so that people can freely report on the news of the day. We actually care about free speech in this country. What the UK is doing is unfathomable in this country. They routinely issue blanket prior restraints on all speech pertaining to a trial and, in the case of an alleged violation, forego a jury trial, declare a person in contempt and proceed with sentencing.
Posted by PanhandleTigah
Florida Freedom Zone
Member since May 2008
9405 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:17 am to
quote:

British law on this “reporting” is clear, and he chose to violate it. I also suspect that he had been warned.
So all those people violating US law by coming across the border should be thrown in prison right?? I mean they've been warned right??

Let me guess....not the same right??
Posted by rsbd
banks of the Mississippi
Member since Jan 2007
22177 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:18 am to
What happens to you when you report the truth. This will happen here if any news agency ever nuts up, especially after Trump is out of office
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48636 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:21 am to
quote:

If Robibson were esposing a liberal cause, this thread would already contain a dozen references to games and their prizes.


Dude...you are supposedly a seasoned trial attorney...and this is the argument you can come up with? Liberals always show their true colors. Always. Your schtick as a reasoned independent couldn't last forever.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:22 am to
quote:

So all those people violating US law by coming across the border should be thrown in prison right?? I mean they've been warned right??

Let me guess....not the same right??
Fined and deported, though I am a libertarian and think that should change. I would favor a guest worker program, with limited (if any) government benefits and no birthright citizenship.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76557 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:24 am to
quote:

if he’s doing something that interferes with the administration of justice
livestreaming outside the courthouse?

Where anyone could be, if they wanted to?
quote:

He seems to be a nut because he’s one of those hysterics thatsees danger everywhere
Maybe, but so?
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:26 am to
quote:

quote:

If Robinson were espousing a liberal cause, this thread would already contain a dozen references to games and their prizes.
Dude...you are supposedly a seasoned trial attorney...and this is the argument you can come up with? Liberals always show their true colors. Always. Your schtick as a reasoned independent couldn't last forever.
Dude, it was not an "argument." It was a joke.

When someone that the Forum does not like commits a crime and gets arrested, beaten, or killed, the first page of the thread will have at LEAST one "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" post.

Robinson committed a crime under British law, and the majority of this Forum rushes to his defense ... because the "other side" was an unpopular minority.

If you don't see the humor in that dichotomy, you need to take a look at the calibration on your bullshitometer.
This post was edited on 5/27/18 at 9:29 am
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76557 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:29 am to
quote:

ecause the "other side" was an unpopular minority.
Right.

Pedophiles
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48636 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:31 am to
You see...this is why I'm confused. When someone says "play stupid games", it is usually a story about someone breaking into someone else's house or taking a selfie while dangling over a cliff.

This case is about freedom of speech. It is a commentary on the U.K. And their suppression of speech. Yet, an educated advocate such as yourself, equates a discussion about suppression of speech to burglaries. You do this beacuse they are both illegal and think that makes a good comparison.

It is an awful comparison. It certainly isn't humorous.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:33 am to
quote:

This has nothing to do with the administration of justice. We sequester juries in this country, so that people can freely report on the news of the day. We actually care about free speech in this country. What the UK is doing is unfathomable in this country. They routinely issue blanket prior restraints on all speech pertaining to a trial and, in the case of an alleged violation, forego a jury trial, declare a person in contempt and proceed with sentencing.
So, you like our system for jury trials better than you like the British system. So do I. If this even had happened here, I would be screaming with everyone else. It didn't happen here.

Robinson broke British law, and he got himself a British punishment for it.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72169 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:34 am to
quote:

When someone that the Forum does not like commits a crime and gets arrested, beaten, or killed, the first page of the thread will have at LEAST one "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" post.
Has anyone ever made that statement for a case involving freedom of speech?
quote:

Robinson committed a crime under British law, and the majority of this Forum rushes to his defense ... because the "other side" was an unpopular minority.
I repeat the question I asked.
quote:

If you don't see the humor in that dichotomy, you need to take a look at the calibration on your bullshitometer.
Are you equating murder, burglary, etc, with freedom of speech?

Damn.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:38 am to
quote:

quote:

because the "other side" was an unpopular minority.
Right. Pedophiles
Well, I was thinking "Muslims," since they have not yet been convicted, but we can use "pedophiles."

My point is that the nature of the crime is irrelevant to this discussion. He was broadcasting about a jury trial in a manner inconsistent with British law.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46283 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Yeah just think about all the conservatives that try to shut down liberal speakers when they come to their campuses.


This is the most important difference between Progs/Dims and patriotic conservatives, true libertarians and classic liberals.

We want to hear Progs/Dims express their ideology without reservations so rational Americans can understand how destructive it is to the future of America that we all love and want to preserve.

On the other hand Progs/Dims don’t want rational common sense conservatives talking to the masses, particularly the easily indoctrinated Americans under age 25, that’s why a lot of universities are off limits to conservatives. They know it would hinder their plans to recruit future voters for the Prog/Dim party.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:39 am to
quote:

It is an awful comparison. It certainly isn't humorous.
Different strokes. I would be willing to bet that you find some things humorous that don't strike me as being particularly funny, too.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48636 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:40 am to
I don't think many people would find a comparison between armed robbery and freedom of speech all that amusing. You are a weird dude. But to each his own.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Has anyone ever made that statement (games/prizes) for a case involving freedom of speech?
Yes. It gets mentioned on basically EVERY thread about the NFL Kneelers.

Yes, I understand that the Kneelers (who I DO NOT support) are not engaging in "free speech" protected by the First Amendment, but neither was Robinson (as there IS NOT First Amendment in Britain).
quote:

Are you equating murder, burglary, etc, with freedom of speech?
No, I am drawing an analogy. You know, "abstract thought."
This post was edited on 5/27/18 at 9:49 am
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48636 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Yes. It gets mentioned on basically EVERY thread about the NFL Kneelers.

Punishment by the government for speech. You use the NFL as a comparison? Good lord. You are way too worried about trying to catch "the board" being hypocritical. I'm beginning to doubt your e-persona.
This post was edited on 5/27/18 at 9:57 am
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41723 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 10:03 am to
But they get free Band-Aids and cough drops so this doesn't matter.

Because they have no firearms, they have no ability to push back.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/27/18 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Punishment by the government for speech. You use the NFL as a comparison? Good lord. You are way too worried about trying to catch "the board" being hypocritical. I'm beginning to doubt your e-persona
Dude, can you READ? I specifically stated that it was not the First Amendment version of "free speech."

Or are you one of those literalists who who cannot accept that there may be a concept of "free speech" broader than that set forth in the First Amendment?

The Kneelers do not raise a valid First Amendment issue. This does NOT mean that their scenario does NOT raise questions of "free speech" in a broader sense.
This post was edited on 5/27/18 at 10:09 am
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram