- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/4/19 at 9:31 am to Ag Zwin
quote:To the current issues:
Also, I read through the points on this page.
Demanding the increase of the legal driving age to 18 (presumably to catch up with the increased drinking age that they're responsible for)……..STUPIDITY
Demanding the institution of progressively less restrictive learners' permits for new drivers, but ending the practice of issuing one-year learners' permits at (depending on the state) age 15 or 16 - they want the minimum age raised to 18...….HOW THE frick DO WE NEED MADD FOR THIS?
Demanding laws prohibiting drivers under 21 from carrying passengers under 21, or from driving without somebody 21 or over in the car to supervise.[4]………..THIS IS frickING RETARDED ON STEROIDS
Demanding a "zero tolerance" view of underage drinking, such as criminal prosecution of parents who serve a glass of wine to an 18, 19 or 20 year old at dinner.[5]…...frick THEM AND THE TOTALITARIAN HORSE THEY'RE RIDING ON
Demanding ignition interlocks for all drivers who've ever been convicted of DWI/DUI.[6]…...EVER? I MEAN, I'M ON BOARD FOR JUST CONVICTED...…...BUT EVER? THIS GOES TO THEIR WHOLE GROSSLY DEMONIZING APPROACH. frick THEM.
Opposing any attempts to return the drinking age to 18 (the legal age of majority in the United States for joining the military (or being drafted), voting, and nearly everything else, as well as the drinking age in nearly every country in the world). Actually this isn't quite accurate: MADD gives this issue the "this isn't even up for debate because it legitimizes their view" treatment.[7]…...STUPIDITY. THEIR LOGIC COULD BE APPLIED TO RAISING IT TO 30. WHY NOT?
Issuing a press release denouncing the video game Grand Theft Auto IV, because it allows players to drink and drive (even though the game made it impossible to drive well by actually simulating some of the real-life effects of alcohol, which seems like a good thing for MADD's agenda).[8]……….THIS IS HONESTLY JUST SAD
Supporting random police roadblocks and sobriety checkpoints.[9]…………….REALLLLLLLLLLLY JUST frick THEM. frick THEM WITH A BASEBALL BAT. THESE THINGS AREN'T EVEN FOR DUI. THE VAST MAJORITY OF ARRESTS AT SUCH PLACES HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH DUI AT ALL. NOT TO MENTION THAT THE COURTS ALLOW THIS shite IS JUST ABSURD ON ITS FACE.
quote:HE SHOULD. HE LEADS A VERY BAD ORGANIZATION EVEN IF HE'S A DECENT GUY. ALTHOUGH, HONESTLY. IF HE'S RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LIST ABOVE, I CALL HIS GOOD GUY STATUS INTO QUESTION
I’ll take some tome to read up on it, then consider if I need to tell Adam to wind it down and find another gig.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 9:33 am to ShortyRob
Ultimately society decides if the costs of gun ownership outweigh the benefits. If enough people decide that it's not worth it, they will ban gun ownership. Only then would we truly see what the benefits of gun ownership are. Otherwise, it's just speculation.
At the risk of fueling the conspiracy theorists, the more these mass shootings occur, the more likely a ban is.
Look at the NFA of '34. That was largely a result of mass murders related to the organized crime in the prohibition era black market in alcohol. These gangland slayings garnered enough press and public sentiment that the feds were pressured to push the legislation through. It would not surprise me one bit to see something similar in response to these modern era murders.
At the risk of fueling the conspiracy theorists, the more these mass shootings occur, the more likely a ban is.
Look at the NFA of '34. That was largely a result of mass murders related to the organized crime in the prohibition era black market in alcohol. These gangland slayings garnered enough press and public sentiment that the feds were pressured to push the legislation through. It would not surprise me one bit to see something similar in response to these modern era murders.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 9:34 am to ShortyRob
He just took up the post this year.
You raise good points. The random checks thing I am less bothered by, though.
You raise good points. The random checks thing I am less bothered by, though.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 9:37 am to bmy
quote:I'm honestly surprised this isn't happening more.
I'm more worried about cars being picked up as the popular weapon of mass murder than I am about guns tbh.
Target chosen properly, one can do a lot more instant carnage with a car or truck than a gun.
I don't bring that up as a point regarding gun control. Just noting that it's gonna be bad when these nut jobs realize that simply driving straight into the below as fast as one can will probably kill and maim more people than just trying it with a gun.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 9:38 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:Yes. If enough people are ignorant, they will win.
Ultimately society decides if the costs of gun ownership outweigh the benefits. If enough people decide that it's not worth it, they will ban gun ownership
I understand how Democratic Republics work.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 9:39 am to Ag Zwin
quote:
You raise good points. The random checks thing I am less bothered by, though.
This is actually their worst position!
Posted on 8/4/19 at 9:41 am to Ag Zwin
quote:
He just took up the post this year. You raise good points. The random checks thing I am less bothered by, though.
In all seriousness. If he were my friend. I'd ask him this.
"If MADD were to get everything on that list, would MADD disband?"
I think you know the answer. And, well. That's the problem.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 9:42 am to ShortyRob
quote:From the perspective of civil liberties, Shorty is 100% correctquote:This is actually their worst position!
You raise good points. The random checks thing I am less bothered by, though.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 9:43 am to ShortyRob
quote:This simply reinforces my point, to the effect that the “ultimate bad” envisioned by MADD is NOT “drunk driving,” but rather any drinking at all.
Demanding a "zero tolerance" view of underage drinking, such as criminal prosecution of parents who serve a glass of wine to an 18, 19 or 20 year old at dinner.[5]…...frick THEM AND THE TOTALITARIAN HORSE THEY'RE RIDING ON
This post was edited on 8/4/19 at 9:53 am
Posted on 8/4/19 at 9:45 am to ShortyRob
“Something must be done.
This is something.
Ergo, we must do this.”
This is something.
Ergo, we must do this.”
Posted on 8/4/19 at 9:48 am to ShortyRob
There are gun shows and everywhere you look there are guns and ammo. The atmosphere is about nothing but guns, shooting and ammo. Everyone there loves guns, shooting and are gun lovers.
Yet, no one ever takes a gun out and starts shootings up patrons at a gun show.
If guns were truly the issue, gun shows would be ground zero for mass shootings.
Yet, no one ever takes a gun out and starts shootings up patrons at a gun show.
If guns were truly the issue, gun shows would be ground zero for mass shootings.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 9:49 am to AggieHank86
quote:It's funny because not only doesn't it even work, but if it did, you STILL can't defend it.
From the perspective of civil liberties, Shorty is 100% correct
I mean hell. We could reduce drugs on the streets if we just started "random sidewalk checkpoints" too. We could post police officers nearby so that if you try and turn around to avoid the checkpoint, they'll chase you down and arrest you!
Posted on 8/4/19 at 9:50 am to AggieHank86
quote:
This simply reinforces my point, to the effect that the “ultimate bad” in vision by MADD is NOT “drunk driving,” but rather any drinking at all.
Yeah.
At this point, they are basically 2019's prohibitionists.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 9:54 am to Ag Zwin
quote:
The random checks thing I am less bothered by, though.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 9:55 am to ShortyRob
quote:
If enough people are ignorant
Your OP assumes that Americans at large are rational in their consideration of policies. I propose that they are not. It's not just "liberals" either, as your OP implies.
It seems that the only solution is for pro-2A people to take control of the situation. Get out in front, and either get rational legislation passed, or somehow reduce the mass murders that are driving the gun control people.
Sitting around crying in echo chambers, and otherwise bitching and moaning about principles, conspiracies (which you're NOT) and the BOR, isn't going to protect any ones rights to bear arms.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 10:04 am to ShortyRob
quote:
This is actually their worst position!
Why? The “probable cause” thing?
Posted on 8/4/19 at 10:08 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:Oh. Quite the opposite. I know they don't.
Your OP assumes that Americans at large are rational in their consideration of policies.
quote:It is on this issue and, liberals are far and away, much bigger single variable thinkers. That's just reality.
It's not just "liberals" either, as your OP implies.
quote:Well, it's not possible so, there's that.
It seems that the only solution is for pro-2A people to take control of the situation. Get out in front, and either get rational legislation passed, or somehow reduce the mass murders that are driving the gun control people.
The problem on the gun issue is twofold.
1)No amount of crime reduction will appease the anti-gun people because people don't perceive total numbers. There will always be enough gun deaths to run some on the news every fricking night. As such, for the average "do something", there's no real difference between 3000 murders a year and 365 murders a year.
2. There's no such thing as "rational" legislation to these people. There's either "legislation that means I never wake up to WalMart being shot up again" or, "legislation that fails".
They're chasing zero. We can't achieve zero. So. Nothing we do at all will change the argument.
Popular
Back to top


0





