Started By
Message

re: To the Anti-trumps on this board

Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:31 am to
Posted by MajorTaylor
Member since Aug 2017
217 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:31 am to
why the stalking?

and what is meant by "alter"? Are you under the impression that I have more than one account on TD or something?
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73446 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:32 am to
quote:

why the stalking?
Responding is stalking?

quote:

and what is meant by "alter"? Are you under the impression that I have more than one account on TD or something?
Posted by MajorTaylor
Member since Aug 2017
217 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Responding is stalking?



No, your emphasis on my post count, my length of history here, and your accusations of my being an alter-ego of some other user is stalking. None of it has anything to do with the topics being discussed. It is just you trolling me with content having to do with my user-data / personal history.
This post was edited on 12/10/17 at 11:40 am
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22781 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:41 am to
I can understand that someone isn't in love with trump as president. However what I don't understand is why people would support a criminal like Hillary over almost anyone else.

Do y'all not believe she was only doing business with people that gave her bribes? Or do y'all not realize her actions directly resulted in people dying?
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73446 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:42 am to
I member another poster who was obsessed with "stalking" very familiar.
Posted by MajorTaylor
Member since Aug 2017
217 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:50 am to
Uh, okay. Whatever.

I've known of this forum for years but never paid much attention to it. Created an account this past Summer. Already kinda regret doing that. But I pretty much regret all of my online activity. I don't do Facebook or Twitter so I've at least shown restraint in that regard!
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73446 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:56 am to
quote:

I've known of this forum for years but never paid much attention to it. Created an account this past Summer. Already kinda regret doing that. But I pretty much regret all of my online activity. I don't do Facebook or Twitter so I've at least shown restraint in that regard!
Another long time lurker first time poster.
Posted by volod
Leesville, LA
Member since Jun 2014
5392 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Many Liberals in the media think TOO HIGHLY of Conservatives in that they fail to see that many Conservatives don't care if Trump colluded with the Russians, don't care if Trump is racist, don't care if Trump is a religious bigot, don't care if Trump isn't much of a Christian himself, don't care if Trump sexually assaulted women, and don't care if Trump raped his ex-wife as she claims he did. As a result of being in their Liberal bubble, these media Liberals fail to see that for many Conservatives the cutting of taxes, the cutting of government waste, the removal of regulations that inhibit businesses, the address of illegal immigration, and the movement to keep Muslims out of America are ALL THAT MATTERS and nullify any concern over the other stuff.


This perfectly sums up not just the POTUS, but state level politics as well. Many people just want a specific agenda to be pushed. It could a robot up there, but as long as its programmed to say "cut taxes on corporations" GOP will vote for it.

Same goes for DEMs will "more social programs in lieu of jobs". They will put said robot on a pedestal.

Its laughable that we tout ourselves as a Christian nation, when politicians on both sides represent the worse we have to offer morally.

Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57243 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Republicans spent 4 years 8 investigations and wasted about $20 million on Benghazi. Time for them to get a taste of their own medicine


Yes. The similarities are the same: One is a politically motivated witch hunt intent on overturning an election; the other involved the death of a United States ambassador on which a phony video was blamed. Yep. They're the same.
Posted by MajorTaylor
Member since Aug 2017
217 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

However what I don't understand is why people would support a criminal like Hillary over almost anyone else.



Consider this perspective:

If Trump wins all the despicable racists who called Obama and his family racist names win. If Trump wins all the people who make racist comments about blacks win. And if Trump wins all the hateful horrible people who say despicable things about Hispanics, non-white immigrants, and Muslims win. If Trump wins all the people who wish gays dead win. If Trump wins all the ignorant White supremacists and neo-Nazis win. If Trump wins the caustic nastiness of people like Michale Savage, Mark Levin, and Ann Coulter wins. If Trump wins the hatemongers like Pamela Geller win. If Trump wins all of that racism, bigotry, and nastiness will see itself as validated and it will be emboldened.

So while Hillary may be corrupt ( as is most every politician ), it is still better another corrupt politician than all that racism, bigotry, hatred, and deplorable unmatched nastiness and evil be emboldened and sent a message of validation.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73446 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 12:03 pm to
Man a shite ton of hyperbole stuffed into one paragraph.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83583 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

If Trump wins all the despicable racists who called Obama and his family racist names win. If Trump wins all the people who make racist comments about blacks win. And if Trump wins all the hateful horrible people who say despicable things about Hispanics, non-white immigrants, and Muslims win. If Trump wins all the people who wish gays dead win. If Trump wins all the ignorant White supremacists and neo-Nazis win. If Trump wins the caustic nastiness of people like Michale Savage, Mark Levin, and Ann Coulter wins. If Trump wins the hatemongers like Pamela Geller win. If Trump wins all of that racism, bigotry, and nastiness will see itself as validated and it will be emboldened.


oh for fricks sake

I hate that I get lumped into the same category as people like you

Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39498 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 12:06 pm to
Everyone should want Trump to succeed. Not because of his politics or personality, but because a successful outsider opens the door for others like him.

Trashing Trump to force voters back into the arms of people like Clinton or Romney is not going to help this country. Give me a president Cook or Dimon, maybe even a president Tillerson.

I think we can all admit that the federal government is absolutely cancerous with party loyalists, and the judicial is an absolute shite show. Giving power back to the establishment would be suicide.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

Now y'all are making the same mistake the Clinton-haters made.
Clinton haters got Clinton impeached. Most Trump haters would take that roll of the dice.
Posted by MajorTaylor
Member since Aug 2017
217 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 12:21 pm to
How ridiculous a notion that some video could cause fanatical muslims to become violent and kill. Next thing you know someone will claim that a political cartoon can prompt fanatical muslims to kill!

As if some youtube video that NO ONE saw could result in violence and attacks on American targets. Pffft...


Egypt-

3,000 demonstrators amass outside U.S. embassy. Protestors scale the embassy walls, tear down the U.S. flag and replace it with a black Islamist flag. Some of the protesters also wrote "There is no God but Allah" on the compound walls. According to Sherine Tadros of Al Jazeera, the protestors demanded that the film be taken "out of circulation" and that some of the protestors would stay at the site until that happens. Egyptian riot police are able to get the situation under control and expel the trespassers from the U.S. embassy compound.

Yemen-

protesters had stormed the grounds of the U.S. embassy in Sana'a. Police fired into the air in an attempt to hold back the crowds, but failed to prevent them from gaining access to the compound and setting fire to vehicles. Guards in Sana'a used tear gas and a water cannon to drive back the crowd. At least 5 protesters were killed and 11 others injured; 24 guards were also injured. The U.S. responded by sending a Marine FAST unit to Yemen.

Sudan-

Sudanese authorities deployed riot police near the American embassy in Khartoum. Nevertheless, protesters breached the outside wall of the compound and clashed with guards; three people were killed. Protesters started fires and tore down the flag in the German embassy. Demonstrators hoisted a black Islamic flag at the German embassy. The neighboring British embassy was also attacked, with two people killed in clashes with the police.

Tunisia-

Protesters entered the compound of the U.S. embassy after climbing the embassy walls and set trees inside the compound ablaze. The protesters attacked the American Cooperative School of Tunis and set it on fire. At least 4 were killed and 46 injured during protests near the embassy on September 15. The U.S. government pulled out all non-essential personnel and urged its citizens to leave the city.


Indonesia-

Up to 500 protesters, many of whom were part of the Islamic Defenders Front and Majelis Mujahideen Indonesia attacked the United States embassy in Jakarta by throwing stones and loose pavement, some reports also state that petrol bombs were used in the attacks. In addition to attacking the embassy, protesters attacked the local police force and embassy guards.


Pakistan-

Pakistani security forces clashed with demonstrators outside the U.S. embassy in Islamabad over the anti-Islam film. Protesters called for the execution of the filmmaker and urged Islamabad to close the US Embassy and expel its diplomats. In the eastern city of Lahore, demonstrators burned the US flag outside the U.S. consulate and shouted slogans against the United States and Israel. On September 16, Voice of America News reported that police fired tear gas and water cannon at hundreds of demonstrators as they approached the heavily guarded consulate in the southern city of Karachi. Protestors torched six cinemas, two banks, a KFC and 5 police vehicles whilst some fired on police, killing two police officers. It was further reported that 10 of the protesters were shot dead afterwards.


India-

The U.S. consulate in Chennai, India, was attacked, with protestors throwing stones at the consulate and attempting to scale the consulate walls. Police dispersed the crowd, causing minor injuries to 25 protesters. The Consulate asked American citizens to enroll in the STEP program, asked American citizens to follow the local news and media and ceased the consulate's operation temporarily.




phony claim about a video resulting in attacks and violence. Lmao. As IF that would ever happen. As if fanatical Muslims would ever attack over a video or a cartoon or a book. Libs are so silly as to think that Muslims are ever irrational and to push this ridiculous notion that Muslims would attack over some "video".
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Which brings up another point, which is that the Mueller investigation is qualitatively very very different from the Starr investigation. It actually has much more in common with the investigations of Nixon.


Actually Mueller is pretty much different from the Nixon investigation being that there was a single provable and already confirmed crime that started it all and what prompted a special counsel.

Mueller's investigation has no such crime at all and all we know is that they're investigating "russian hacking" and "interference" and are relying on the the word of 3rd party sources in CrowdStrike and GPS Fusion which by the way they can't and still haven't verified their own dossier.

That's why evidence of illegal collusion still hasn't been found and very likely will not be because Mueller's investigation is nothing more than a glorified fishing expedition that had no crime that prompted his "mandate".

They're literally doing everything they can to find probable cause to investigate Trump and it's only getting harder now for them.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Clinton haters got Clinton impeached. Most Trump haters would take that roll of the dice.



Wasn't all that hard to do with a republican Congress that actively hated Clinton's guts.

By all means start voting democrat if you really want Trump impeached.
Posted by MajorTaylor
Member since Aug 2017
217 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 12:27 pm to
No, I said I knew of the forum. I didn't lurk it or even go to this website.

I'd see posts from it quoted from time to time. And I was aware of TD's ill repute.
Posted by Barnacle Bill
Dallas
Member since Jan 2016
397 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 12:30 pm to
You mean the Obama administration actually sent troops to rescue those poor souls and didn't leave them to die.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39498 posts
Posted on 12/10/17 at 12:34 pm to
You do realize that they admitted the Benghazi attack had nothing to do with the video and knew it at the time, right?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram