- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tina Peters issues statement from Colorado prison.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 11:16 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/2/25 at 11:16 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Who told you this? The judge who personally investigated the fraud? Oh, Barrett DIDN'T do that? Well, hmph. That's interesting
The data in no way showed any fraud
0
Posted on 10/2/25 at 11:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
His mind is made up. He's not conflating the topics of the conviction and sentencing like you are.
I literally had the following in the post that he responded to:
quote:
And as it relates to a penalty for her crimes, it’s relevant.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 12:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
I actually agree with you on this one. While I don’t disagree with the actions(if there were actually any irregularities), the way she went about it was ill-advised. I agree with your unhinged QAnon assessment. Things could be much different for her and something would have been done about this if it were legitimate.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 12:41 pm to loogaroo
So what did she or the party she allowed access to the information turn up?
Posted on 10/2/25 at 12:42 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Tina Peters
Name: PETERS, TINA M
Age: 70
Ethnicity: WHITE
Gender: FEMALE
Hair Color: WHITE
Eye Color: BLUE
Height: 5' 04"
Weight: 138
DOC Number: 203512
Est. Parole
Eligibility Date: 01/26/2029
Next Parole
Hearing Date: Oct 2028
This offender is scheduled on the Parole Board agenda for the month and year above. Please contact the facility case manager for the exact date.
Est. Mandatory
Release Date: 03/11/2033
Est. Sentence
Discharge Date:
Current Facility
Assignment: LA VISTA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Do your time, Tina.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 12:43 pm to BigTigerJoe
quote:
The DOJ needs to go after everyone that imprisoned her.
Just start arresting all their asses, now. You drop their charges and they commute her sentence.
So the right is no longer about rule of law?
Posted on 10/2/25 at 12:44 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Quote what you're criticizing
I'm dying to see where he says Q weighed in on the 2020 election "results".
Of course, he has nothing and already demonstrated as much because he defaulted to the retardation of using "QAnon". The reddest of red flags that a moron has been detected.
Folks who know the difference between Q & Anons have made the distinction since Q settled the matter in mid-Oct. 2020. Anyone who persists in the "QAnon" label after that is just trying to bludgeon folks with their ignorance.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 12:48 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:
So what did she or the party she allowed access to the information turn up?
Nothing reflecting the muh steal nonsense. It was released to the public so the analysis was out there. Nothing came of it.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 12:48 pm to Nelson Biederman IV
quote:
Things could be much different for her and something would have been done about this if it were legitimate.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 12:48 pm to loogaroo
Democrats hate whistle blowers that expose them
Posted on 10/2/25 at 12:51 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Of course, he has nothing and already demonstrated as much because he defaulted to the retardation of using "QAnon". The reddest of red flags that a moron has been detected.
Folks who know the difference between Q & Anons have made the distinction since Q settled the matter in mid-Oct. 2020. Anyone who persists in the "QAnon" label after that is just trying to bludgeon folks with their ignorance.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 12:51 pm to jclem11
quote:
So the right is no longer about rule of law?
This and J6 prove they aren't.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 12:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Nothing reflecting the muh steal nonsense. It was released to the public so the analysis was out there. Nothing came of it.
Damn. Juice wasn't worth the squeeze.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 12:56 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:
Damn. Juice wasn't worth the squeeze.
Like with basically every post-election venture trying to prove the fraud.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 12:56 pm to moneyg
quote:
The sentence is waaaaay out of line.
If she had been trying to change votes rather than trying to preserve the record of voting her sentence would be appropriate. The reality was that she was trying to preserve proof that dems were engaged in fraud as usual.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 1:03 pm to VoxDawg
Wrong. IF there were legitimate irregularities it needs to be addressed and there needs to be consequences for all parties involved. I just don’t think that’s the case here. I think the election was stolen, and it’s irrefutable that it was interfered with, at the very least. I just don’t think this case and this instance was necessarily part of that and it’s damn sure not prove-able or the administration would be all over it.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 1:05 pm to Nelson Biederman IV
quote:
I just don’t think this case and this instance was necessarily part of that and it’s damn sure not prove-able or the administration would be all over it.
Correct.
The information is in the public domain. NOTHING has come from it.
She was manipulated and had QAnon brain rot, likely due to the loss of her son. It's despicable manipulation of a broken woman.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 1:11 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Democrats hate whistle blowers that expose them
Tina Peters, the former Mesa County Clerk in Colorado, was trying to preserve election data and records from the 2020 presidential election. As part of her role, she created forensic images (backups) of the county's election management system hard drive before a required software update from Dominion Voting Systems, fearing the update would erase critical voting information and prevent future audits for potential fraud.
The data was about to be destroyed by the state as part of a routine software upgrade to the voting system mandated by the Colorado Secretary of State's office. Peters argued that this upgrade would overwrite or erase the original hard drive contents on the Election Management System (EMS) server, making it impossible to later verify or audit the 2020 results.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 1:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
Sounds like she’s a PATRIOT to me!
Anyone that helped expose the election fraud going on in this country deserves a huge paycheck and early retirement.
I can’t figure out why DJT isn’t going to lick her up in AF1 with red carpet. For real…
Anyone that helped expose the election fraud going on in this country deserves a huge paycheck and early retirement.
I can’t figure out why DJT isn’t going to lick her up in AF1 with red carpet. For real…
Posted on 10/2/25 at 1:23 pm to thejuiceisloose
quote:
Don't do the crime if you can't do the time, Tina
You sound dumb.
What crime did she commit.
Be specific.
Page 7 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News