- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tina Peters data- 29k election records deleted or altered…
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:03 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
hose were 315k valid, legal votes.
I am certainly not as up on the topic as you but could you provide me the absolute irrefutable proof that those votes were legal and valid
1
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:05 am to dafif
quote:
I am certainly not as up on the topic as you but could you provide me the absolute irrefutable proof that those votes were legal and valid
They did multiple recounts that confirmed the machines were zeroed, even though they weren't certified to be at zero prior to the vote.
I posted a story earlier discussing this. The total discrepancy in Fulton was sub-800 votes (and there wasn't anything specific to these 134 machines so they could be from any sort of error along the way).
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
multiple recounts“(Quote SF).
Yeah, recounting votes instead of examining and confirming their validity is a red herring. Validation of voter roles and signatures on harvested ballots is where the fraud exist. And just like with Hunter’s Laptop, everyone knows it. But lies anyway.
It’s not hard to make voting totally honest and verifiable, but the Dems will have none of it. Even aside from “hanging chad” scenarios. Why not? Answer is obvious to those that are honest.
Yeah, recounting votes instead of examining and confirming their validity is a red herring. Validation of voter roles and signatures on harvested ballots is where the fraud exist. And just like with Hunter’s Laptop, everyone knows it. But lies anyway.
It’s not hard to make voting totally honest and verifiable, but the Dems will have none of it. Even aside from “hanging chad” scenarios. Why not? Answer is obvious to those that are honest.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:52 pm to yakster
quote:
Don’t you people know anything? Georgia board of elections runs everything through SFP before making any decisions on what’s correct and incorrect.
Man, I had COMPLETELY forgotten about that!!
All this time, he’s been here on behalf of the Ga Board of Elections and we’re just unappreciative.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:57 pm to Placekicker
The thread title and body shows zero interest in whether the 9 years was warranted or not.
Why is the entire thread debating that and not assertion that her data proves sketchy shite happened?
Why is the entire thread debating that and not assertion that her data proves sketchy shite happened?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:00 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
The thread title and body shows zero interest in whether the 9 years was warranted or not.
Her criminality and the sentence are 2 different discussions
We can't get to the latter until the former is agreed upon. We are stuck here.
quote:
Why is the entire thread debating that and not assertion that her data proves sketchy shite happened?
Because there is a near religious devotion to her cause even though it's dumb as shite.
Hence why we are stuck at the guilt part of the discussion. Admitting she is guilty is like saying God doesn't exist for some
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
i'll never understand why maga struggles with words so mightily.
I can summarize in picture form:
Oh look, two of the poliboard's worst prog filth liberals high fiving each other over owning Trumpers. So cute... Get a room, figs.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:24 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Why is the entire thread debating that and not assertion that her data proves sketchy shite happened?
Because our friend, SFP, finds actual election fraud immaterial in this case and relishes in the fact that a whistleblower ended up in jail for exposing said fraud.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:42 pm to RCDfan1950
quote:
Validation of voter roles and signatures on harvested ballots is where the fraud exist
THIS is the unassailable truth about the 2020 election.
The 'harvest' was very effective for the Dems.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The 315k clerical error did nothing to change the outcome of the election
That is a very poor standard to follow and you know you are being disingenuous at best.
Do better SFP, or at least try.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
Reading your post gave me ear cancer. You really can’t be a lawyer. Please tell me aren’t really a lawyer. OMG, your post make you sound like DOJ under Biden. You really sound ignorant. Merry Christmas!
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:23 pm to LSUBALLER
SF is a damn good lawyer, smarts and commitment. If I were guilty and didn’t want to own it, I’d hire him. “If the glove don’t fit…gotta acquit “.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:I’m talking about neither her criminality or sentence.
Her criminality and the sentence are 2 different discussions We can't get to the latter until the former is agreed upon. We are stuck here.
And only focusing on the results found from her crime.
Is there anything to what we’ve found from the data she mishandled/stole?
quote:I hear you.
Because there is a near religious devotion to her cause even though it's dumb as shite. Hence why we are stuck at the guilt part of the discussion. Admitting she is guilty is like saying God doesn't exist for some
I just thought OP was set up in a way that would push the conversation towards what’s in the data.
That would be a much better thread than the 100th one on whether she was done wrong or not, imo. OP seemed to want that.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:53 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
I just thought OP was set up in a way that would push the conversation towards what’s in the data.
That would be a much better thread than the 100th one on whether she was done wrong or not, imo. OP seemed to want that.
That’s exactly what I was trying to do. Then, like so many other threads, SFP comes along and obfuscates the conversation.
Page 12 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News