- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Time for a real news channel.
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:23 am
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:23 am
Fox had its run.
But they have picked off every star but tucker and hannity.
And they may be gone soon anyway.
How does breitbart get on to cable mainstream?
But they have picked off every star but tucker and hannity.
And they may be gone soon anyway.
How does breitbart get on to cable mainstream?
8
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:25 am to dstone12
Have you tried BBC?
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:26 am to dstone12
Tucker isn't going anywhere.
Wouldn't care if Hannity got the ax. Dude is a giant windbag
Wouldn't care if Hannity got the ax. Dude is a giant windbag
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:28 am to upgrayedd
quote:
Tucker isn't going anywhere. Wouldn't care if Hannity got the ax. Dude is a giant windbag
Regardless,
This is not Fox News of 5 years ago.
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:28 am to dstone12
Is Sky News Fox?
We do need a real news place. Let CNN have Toddy, Judge Nap, Megyn Kelly lol, and Fox. It is rumored that Ailes sons are pussy hat wearers, and Obama's sheik sugar daddy owns a great deal of Fox, it is only a matter of time.
We do need a real news place. Let CNN have Toddy, Judge Nap, Megyn Kelly lol, and Fox. It is rumored that Ailes sons are pussy hat wearers, and Obama's sheik sugar daddy owns a great deal of Fox, it is only a matter of time.
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:29 am to dstone12
A real news channel would have no opinion pieces and no panel discussions. It would have a series of interchangable faces telling us who/what/when/where and would have no “stars/personalities.”
I would watch that channel.
I would watch that channel.
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:31 am to AggieHank86
quote:
A real news channel would have no opinion pieces and no panel discussions.
No panel discussions?
You're against open debate in the name of truth? Nice
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:33 am to dstone12
Aljezerra America had a good start. Then hey dropped the international group and hired a bunch of unemployable American journalist flunkys. And then they went out of business. To no one’s surprise.
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:34 am to upgrayedd
quote:he is fulfilling a role that is needed for the conservatives in this country. Acknowledge it and move on.
Wouldn't care if Hannity got the ax. Dude is a giant windbag
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:38 am to cajunangelle
quote:
It is rumored that Ailes sons are pussy hat wearers
This is what I remember from a while back. It’s just a matter of time.
Is the world then cut off from a semi conservative network from then on?
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:39 am to upgrayedd
quote:I love debate. Debate is not “news,” and it is far too easy to slant those panels by selecting participants likely to say what you want to convey.quote:No panel discussions? You're against open debate in the name of truth? Nice
A real news channel would have no opinion pieces and no panel discussions.
If you want an “opinion channel,” that is fine. It is exactly what we now have, whether you are talking about Hannity’s insanity or Lemon’s condescension.
Just do not conflate it with “news.”
This post was edited on 3/17/19 at 11:42 am
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:40 am to ChexMix
Oh, for sure.
His blind demagoguery is just annoying and his "We've got breaking news tonight that will shatter everything you've been told" at every show opening is flat out retarded
His blind demagoguery is just annoying and his "We've got breaking news tonight that will shatter everything you've been told" at every show opening is flat out retarded
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:44 am to dstone12
Watch CSPAN...
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:45 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I love debate. Debate is not “news,” and it is far too easy to slant those panels by selecting participants likely to say what you want to convey.
It's representing 2 different points of view so the audience can decide. You can easily vet panel members. If you're that concerned with putting a slant on things, endorsing a single source news org is absurd, but you're not great with consistency so it isn't surprising.
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:46 am to upgrayedd
but it is all we got. he is the only one with Sara and John talking about the coup. If he would NOT DO anymore monologues and not cut off his guests speaking...
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:49 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I love debate. Debate is not “news,” and it is far too easy to slant those panels by selecting participants likely to say what you want to convey. If you want an “opinion channel,” that is fine.
It is exactly what we now have, whether you are talking about Hannity’s insanity or Lemon’s condescension.
Just do not conflate it with “news.”
This. Every bit of this.
You would have a very difficult time finding a true "news channel" today. BBC is better. Bloomberg is also better. At least their editorial opinions are not guised as "news" like in the US MSM.
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:50 am to cajunangelle
quote:
but it is all we got. he is the only one with Sara and John talking about the coup. If he would NOT DO anymore monologues and not cut off his guests speaking...
I agree that his guests are the only good thing about his show. Unfortunately, he hates the fact they the talk
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:51 am to upgrayedd
quote:
Debate is not “news,”
quote:
It's representing 2 different points of view so the audience can decide.
Sooooo….. "not news"
Why are you attacking Hank. He was completely correct in his post.
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:53 am to Paul Allen
quote:
Have you tried BBC?
You mean CNN and MSNBC with a British accent?
Posted on 3/17/19 at 11:55 am to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
Sooooo….. "not news"
Why are you attacking Hank. He was completely correct in his post.
Well, there are times where the events that are reported have consequences. There's nothing wrong with a "what does this mean" or "what are the repercussions of these events" type discussions. They are most certainly news.
Having reasonable people present what will precipitate following these reported events is absolutely news.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News