re: Tillis applauds jury’s rejection of Justice Department’s attempt to indict Democrats

quote:

---

What unlawful orders were given? Be specific.

---

Your comprehension of what they said is pitiful. They never accused anyone of giving unlawful orders but just reminded troops to not obey unlawful orders. I guess you want troops to obey unlawful orders?

But judging by the actions of the ice agents murdering people this regime may think they are above the law so it’s good advice.

quote:

---

But I never thought I’d see fascism rear it’s ugly head.

---

You mean, like a teacher in California getting fired because she voiced an opinion in favor of ICE? Or a Christian activist getting shot in the neck?

Yeah, I'm with you. I wish you would speak to you fellow left-wingers and encourage them to tamp down the radical activity.

quote:

---

Your comprehension of what they said is pitiful. They never accused anyone of giving unlawful orders but just reminded troops to not obey unlawful orders. I guess you want troops to obey unlawful orders?

---

My comprehension is fine, clearly you don't understand the military. The troops don't need some idiotic reminder about orders from left wing operatives. Kelly should have been recalled to active duty and charged under the UCMJ. The entire purpose was to muddy the waters to give the impression that the administration was giving, or going to give, unlawful orders. But no unlawful orders were given, as you well know. The whole charade was intended to undermine the President's authority in a seditious manner.

quote:

---

They were trying to foment activism among the rank and file and you know it. That is conduct unbecoming of an officer.

---

If the behavior is all lawful, how is it ?

quote:

---

My comprehension is fine, clearly you don't understand the military. The troops don't need some idiotic reminder about orders from left wing operatives. Kelly should have been recalled to active duty and charged under the UCMJ. The entire purpose was to muddy the waters to give the impression that the administration was giving, or going to give, unlawful orders. But no unlawful orders were given, as you well know. The whole charade was intended to undermine the President's authority in a seditious manner.

---

If leaders believe the leader of the country would give unlawful orders, which most people do, then maybe that leader should be impeached.

trump wanted to invade Greenland for crying out loud, the moron is a raving maniac and has no business being president.

I mean this whole discussion is pointless. Clearly the law decided they didn’t do anything illegal. A grand jury saw nothing that warranted an indictment, which should be the end of it.

If they didn’t think they could get a grand jury to charge any of them, why would the DOJ even try? It’s a fricking joke.

No, they did not. They reminded military members they have an obligation to refuse ILLEGAL orders.

Here's a very simple one: You get in a firefight. Afterward, you discover an enemy soldier, who promptly surrenders. A lieutenant comes along and tells you to put a bullet in the guy's head.

That's an illegal order.

NO they told the military to defy illegal orders! WTF is wrong with you people.
You must live a miserable life. Read a Fcking book!!