- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:29 pm to EastBankTiger
quote:
...look, I get that lawyers are paid to often have to feign ignorance in court to protect a client...but I'm impressed by your repeated willingness to do so on here for free.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:31 pm to Jbird
quote:
Never saw the irrelevant coming!
It's an epidemic online, which is why you see it pointed out so often.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
I mean to me, it’s clearly suggesting the possibility they did a lot more than just “snitching.” I don’t see how that’s all you gather out of that and where there has been very little inside information publicly releases about these organizations
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:33 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
It just seems a bit of a leap of logic and reason to say “these were nothing but snitches”
I haven't kept up. This is the current talking point?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:36 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
mean, come on.
You're arguing against things you've not even read.
This isn't anything new for this clown. He recently was in a thread arguing for pages and pages about the contents of a video that he himself admitted he refuses to watch.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
By Housemate 2.0
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:37 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
And he’s cleverly using “snitches” over and over again. Even though the actual indictment notes these individuals were often the heads, fundraisers or chairman of these groups…:.including an Imperil Wizard of the KKK. All on the SPLC payroll.
But they had nothing to do with these groups activities…they were just snitches.
Funny, but I don't recall SFP ever referring to "Lieutenant Colonel" Vindman as being a snitch.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:42 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I mean to me, it’s clearly suggesting the possibility they did a lot more than just “snitching.” I don’t see how that’s all you gather out of that and where there has been very little inside information publicly releases about these organizations
It leads to the "if they had more, why didn't they use it" questions.
Don't you think actual evidence/allegations of this direction and coordination would have been more impactful (both for the case and media spin)?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:42 pm to GRTiger
quote:
This is the current talking point?
That's all that the indictment alleges
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:43 pm to KCT
quote:
Funny, but I don't recall SFP ever referring to "Lieutenant Colonel" Vindman as being a snitch.
See, JBird? great example of what I was speaking of earlier.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
The first page of the indictment notes thes guys were acting at the direction and supervision of the SPLC.
Ignoring the fact that suggesting they were paying some random losers hundreds of thousands of dollars and not having control over their actions is pretty absurd.
Eta
Also ignoring the fact that these funds were obtained unfer false pretenses and the payments were hidden to avoid detection. That's some good old-fashioned white collar fraud, regardless of the efforts to minimize SPLC's involvement.
Ignoring the fact that suggesting they were paying some random losers hundreds of thousands of dollars and not having control over their actions is pretty absurd.
Eta
Also ignoring the fact that these funds were obtained unfer false pretenses and the payments were hidden to avoid detection. That's some good old-fashioned white collar fraud, regardless of the efforts to minimize SPLC's involvement.
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Funny, but I don't recall SFP ever referring to "Lieutenant Colonel" Vindman as being a snitch.
See, JBird? great example of what I was speaking of earlier.
I find it hilarious that you would rather eat elephant dung than give a direct response to almost anything.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
Well was he?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Obviously you didn't
I read the indictment.
quote:
F-37 was a member of the online leadership chat group that planned the 2017
"Unite the Right" event i n Charlottesville, Virginia and attended the event at
the direction of the SPLC. F-37 made racist postings under the supervision of
the SPLC and helped coordinate transportation to the event for several
attendees. Between 2015 and 2023, the SPLC secretly paid F-37 more than
$270,000.00.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:49 pm to NC_Tigah
slo is the last air puncher. LOL 
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's used as a dog whistle for sympathizing with Jewish people by antisemites, and the SPLC is even regarded in those circles as a Jewish organization. Sometimes the reference goes into the sphere of Jewish-aligned Marxism.
Jesus Christ.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It leads to the "if they had more, why didn't they use it" questions
Seems to me the fraud in this is the payment. What else would they need to use?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:55 pm to GRTiger
quote:
The first page of the indictment notes thes guys were acting at the direction and supervision of the SPLC.
What text, specifically, references this direction?
quote:
and the payments were hidden to avoid detection. T
I have said since I first read the indictment that the bank fraud charges have legs.
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:55 pm to Jbird
quote:
Well was he?
What's the relevance?
Page 15 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News