- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This space for white women only- it’s getting thousands of likes
Posted on 7/14/26 at 1:59 pm to Kraut Dawg
Posted on 7/14/26 at 1:59 pm to Kraut Dawg
quote:
I never made an argument. I made a statement. And you're doing exactly what I said you'd do & that's try to deflect the point. If you don't want to infer, then you want it spelled out to you like you're a child. The IRS doesn't offer race based statistics on taxes paid. But the perpetual victims in society continue with how they're not paid as much or have harder times finding a job. That means low/no income. Don't like it? Take it up with the group of victims who perpetuate that. Unless you're calling the race hustlers liars? Because they're the ones who told me. But you backed off pretty quick on the Medicaid point, didn't you? Don't be so angry my friend.
This has gotten a good deal simpler than you seem able to make it.
You challenged me to respond with “citations, math, and facts,” then admitted the data needed to support your own conclusion aren’t available. Your words: “The IRS doesn’t offer race based statistics on taxes paid.”
So the claim that one race “pays the bills” isn’t something you proved with citations, math, or facts. It’s an inference. That’s been the point from the start, and it shouldn’t require this much hand-holding to get there.
I never disputed the Medicaid statistic. I disputed everything you piled on top of it. A higher Medicaid enrollment rate shows a difference in enrollment. By itself, it does not show who funds the program, and it certainly does not prove that one race “needs” another infinitely more than the reverse.
If you have data that connect those dots, post them. If you don’t, then all you’ve got is one supported statistic dragging a wagonload of assumptions behind it.
So no, I’m not refusing to infer. I’m refusing to mistake your guess for proof just because you delivered it with the confidence of a man who hasn’t yet realized he never made his case.
1
Posted on 7/14/26 at 2:02 pm to 4cubbies
I was upvote number 5.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 2:05 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
No it most definitely is. For the last 20 years blacks could have their cake and eat it too, meaning they could be outwardly racists, divisive and self-serving with no recourse (and in fact to their benefit!). Now that Whites are able to the same without fear of reprisal, it will become much more imperative for blacks to assimilate back into polite society. Because, frankly, they need us infinitely more than we need them.
Nothing says ‘I’m definitely not racist’ quite like writing a manifesto about why one race ‘needs’ another. You’re complaining about prejudice by arguing for… more prejudice.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 2:08 pm to CrystalPreserves
TLDNR
Muh Fatique
Muh Fatique
Posted on 7/14/26 at 2:14 pm to Zgeo
That’s a mighty efficient way to announce you couldn’t read three sentences and still wanted attention bubba.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 2:17 pm to CrystalPreserves
quote:
Nothing says ‘I’m definitely not racist’ quite like writing a manifesto about why one race ‘needs’ another. You’re complaining about prejudice by arguing for… more prejudice.
Not really, bubba.
It’s just facts, statistics, demographics, history,
sociology…bubba.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 3:00 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:
Not really, bubba. It’s just facts, statistics, demographics, history, sociology…bubba.
That’s a handsome pile of academic nouns, bubba. Shame you forgot to bring an actual fact, statistic, demographic, historical example, or sociological argument with you.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 3:33 pm to CrystalPreserves
It’s been posted ad nauseam on this board year after year after year, bubba.
Familiarize yourself with “per capita” as best your emotions allow, bubba.
Then proceed with caution as your belief system takes damage…cope as needed and allow denial to retake its comfortable residence, bubba.
I suspect it’s pointless as truth reveals itself.
ETA-bubba
Familiarize yourself with “per capita” as best your emotions allow, bubba.
Then proceed with caution as your belief system takes damage…cope as needed and allow denial to retake its comfortable residence, bubba.
I suspect it’s pointless as truth reveals itself.
ETA-bubba
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 7/14/26 at 4:38 pm to CrystalPreserves
quote:
So point to the data showing total taxes paid by each group, the portion of Medicaid funding attributable to each group, and the measure you’re using to establish that one race “needs” another. Until then, you have supported one narrow statistic and treated the rest of your assumptions as though they arrived pre-proven.
Be careful what you directly ask for.
LINK
quote:
Editor's note: This report as been accepted for publication by The National Tax Journal.
quote:
White Black Hisp
Unweighted sample 206517 35258 2883
Average taxable income 58586 23104 21980
Average income tax liability 10078 2000 1151
EITC eligibility 0.13 0.26 0.33
SSI, TANF, and other. 0.006 0.041 0.028
Medicaid 0.014 0.054 0.051
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 4:52 pm
Posted on 7/14/26 at 4:53 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
A thread announcing that idiots are still embarrassing themselves on social media.
And this is a relief?
Now comment on blacks doing this all over social media. Unless you feel the same, you're a hypocrite.
Fatigue is real.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 5:05 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:
It’s been posted ad nauseam on this board year after year after year, bubba. Familiarize yourself with “per capita” as best your emotions allow, bubba. Then proceed with caution as your belief system takes damage…cope as needed and allow denial to retake its comfortable residence, bubba. I suspect it’s pointless as truth reveals itself. ETA-bubba
Funny thing about people who actually have facts. They usually just post them.
The folks who keep saying "look it up," "it's been posted before," and "per capita"... they're usually hoping nobody notices they never made the argument they're congratulating themselves for winning.
Take your time, bubba.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 9:56 pm to CrystalPreserves
So again, you're wanting to go off into left field. At no point have you disputed anything with evidence. I used what I knew to make (correct) assumptions. You? Just your emotions.
The IRS doesn't keep race based tax data. Would you accept data from the St Louis Federal Reserve as credible?
Taxes paid by one race
Taxes paid by another race
One says $11,141. The other says $5540. Do you know math? Seems a lot like the Medicaid discussion.
I knew that I was right, and you've ignorantly disputed it.
Any other points you want to dispute that I come back with fact based data? Keep in mind, I'm using government statistics, not some biased media source.
quote:
So the claim that one race “pays the bills” isn’t something you proved with citations, math, or facts. It’s an inference. That’s been the point from the start, and it shouldn’t require this much hand-holding to get there.
The IRS doesn't keep race based tax data. Would you accept data from the St Louis Federal Reserve as credible?
Taxes paid by one race
Taxes paid by another race
One says $11,141. The other says $5540. Do you know math? Seems a lot like the Medicaid discussion.
quote:
I’m refusing to mistake your guess for proof just because you delivered it with the confidence of a man who hasn’t yet realized he never made his case.
I knew that I was right, and you've ignorantly disputed it.
Any other points you want to dispute that I come back with fact based data? Keep in mind, I'm using government statistics, not some biased media source.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 9:14 am to CrystalPreserves
quote:
Funny thing about people who actually have facts. They usually just post them.
Did you actually post this after actual numbers had been shown?
Posted on 7/15/26 at 10:04 am to Flats
quote:
Your self awareness isn't just lacking, it's non-existent.
She is aware of what she is doing, However, in her mind, her cause is just and noble, so it’s different.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 10:28 am to CleverUserName
quote:
Did you actually post this after actual numbers had been shown?
Then quote the numbers and explain how they support his unfinished claim.
“Numbers were shown somewhere” still isn’t an argument. Data without context, source, comparison, or a logical bridge to the conclusion is just arithmetic wearing a cowboy hat baw
Posted on 7/15/26 at 11:27 am to CrystalPreserves
This is what you posted:
You were then supplied with figures that shows the statistical difference in average income, average tax liability, Federal assistance enrollment, and Medicaid enrollment after you asked for it. You asked.... you were supplied.
Reports are in the link. And you will also find.. these figures are from a politically hard left source.. to keep the "but but but MAGA sources!" to a minimal.
If you cannot make an inference between a group that pays 5 times the tax liability vs being enrolled at a much lower rate in federal assistance... well... I dont know what else to say.
Again. Reports are in the link. Pretty self explanatory.
quote:
That establishes a difference in Medicaid enrollment, but it does not establish that one race “pays the bills,” that one race financially supports another, or that one race “needs” another infinitely more than the reverse.
You were then supplied with figures that shows the statistical difference in average income, average tax liability, Federal assistance enrollment, and Medicaid enrollment after you asked for it. You asked.... you were supplied.
quote:
explain how they support his unfinished claim.
Reports are in the link. And you will also find.. these figures are from a politically hard left source.. to keep the "but but but MAGA sources!" to a minimal.
If you cannot make an inference between a group that pays 5 times the tax liability vs being enrolled at a much lower rate in federal assistance... well... I dont know what else to say.
quote:
Numbers were shown somewhere” still isn’t an argument
Again. Reports are in the link. Pretty self explanatory.
This post was edited on 7/15/26 at 11:33 am
Posted on 7/15/26 at 11:58 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I would love to observe a regular day in your world.
This all may be an act on your part, but a regular day in your world appears to be defend and justify with every fiber in your being any and all illegal activities by minorities as well as decry your whiteness to any and everyone.
You really come across as a miserable ,sad, unhappy person. I do hope this is an act.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 12:16 pm to TrueTiger
I made a relatively long trip to Jonesboro, AR this past weekend to play in a golf tournament. Had to make a visit to Target and upon leaving the store, I heard a bunch of of loud music and laughing in the parking lot. I looked over to see a car full of black youths in a car parked next to an open handicap space. The music was blasted ghetto, and one of the black girls was outside the car in the middle of the handicap space twerking for about a minute. It was the most ridiculous and disgusting thing I've ever witnessed in person.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 4:50 pm to CleverUserName
You’re still changing the subject.
Nobody questioned that average income, tax liability, or assistance enrollment differ. The question was how those statistics prove your much bigger claim that one race “pays the bills” for another or “needs” the other infinitely more.
That’s the part you’ve never demonstrated. You just keep pointing back at the numbers and acting like the conclusion hitchhiked in with them.
Data describe differences. They don’t automatically establish causation or validate sweeping racial conclusions. That logical leap is doing all the heavy lifting here.
Nobody questioned that average income, tax liability, or assistance enrollment differ. The question was how those statistics prove your much bigger claim that one race “pays the bills” for another or “needs” the other infinitely more.
That’s the part you’ve never demonstrated. You just keep pointing back at the numbers and acting like the conclusion hitchhiked in with them.
Data describe differences. They don’t automatically establish causation or validate sweeping racial conclusions. That logical leap is doing all the heavy lifting here.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 5:13 pm to CrystalPreserves
quote:
Nobody questioned that average income, tax liability, or assistance enrollment differ. The question was how those statistics prove your much bigger claim that one race “pays the bills” for another or “needs” the other infinitely more.
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.... when one group pays 5 times the tax (revenue) and consumes less """Earned"""" Income tax credit and federal handouts... they are funding the other. It's actually a very simple economic conclusion to make.
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News