- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This space for white women only- it’s getting thousands of likes
Posted on 7/15/26 at 5:28 pm to CleverUserName
Posted on 7/15/26 at 5:28 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.... when one group pays 5 times the tax (revenue) and consumes less """Earned"""" Income tax credit and federal handouts... they are funding the other. It's actually a very simple economic conclusion to make.
No, it’s a simple conclusion only if you ignore the parts that make it economics instead of bumper-sticker sociology.
Higher average tax liability and lower average benefit use demonstrate a fiscal disparity. They do not demonstrate that one race “funds” another. Taxes aren’t collected into racial accounts and redistributed along racial lines. They’re collected from individuals and businesses and spent according to tax law and program eligibility.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 5:45 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
The men here scroll Twitter
Watch it now. I don't even have Twitter.
On topic, I got nada. Don't much care about it. Was reading purely for entertainment
Posted on 7/15/26 at 5:50 pm to UtahCajun
The other posters here more than make up for your lack of engagement.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 5:51 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
Remember FUBU - For Us By Us?
Farmers Useta Beat Us
Posted on 7/15/26 at 6:05 pm to Kraut Dawg
Well, look at that baw. After several rounds of telling me to “infer” your assumptions, you finally posted some data. That’s a step in the right direction.
Now read your own links carefully. If those figures are accurate, they show a difference in average federal taxes paid by households in different racial categories. They do not show that one race “pays all the bills,” that the other race doesn’t contribute, who specifically finances whose Medicaid benefits, or that one race “needs” another infinitely more than the reverse. That’s the same leap I’ve been pointing out from the beginning.
And no, I didn’t “ignorantly dispute” your numbers. You hadn’t posted any. You made an assumption, declared yourself right, admitted the IRS didn’t provide the data, and told everyone else to infer the rest. Now you’ve finally brought numbers to the table, but they still don’t establish the conclusion you attached to them.
So congratulations. You’ve supported the narrower proposition that one group pays more federal tax on average than another. The much broader claim is still missing the evidence you keep insisting you’ve already provided. That’s the part you haven’t managed to finish yet bubba. You finally found one fact, puffed your chest out, and started strutting around like you’d conquered the county. Trouble is, that little fact still won’t carry the argument you’ve been riding it around on. All that crowing, and the saddle’s still empty baw.
Now read your own links carefully. If those figures are accurate, they show a difference in average federal taxes paid by households in different racial categories. They do not show that one race “pays all the bills,” that the other race doesn’t contribute, who specifically finances whose Medicaid benefits, or that one race “needs” another infinitely more than the reverse. That’s the same leap I’ve been pointing out from the beginning.
And no, I didn’t “ignorantly dispute” your numbers. You hadn’t posted any. You made an assumption, declared yourself right, admitted the IRS didn’t provide the data, and told everyone else to infer the rest. Now you’ve finally brought numbers to the table, but they still don’t establish the conclusion you attached to them.
So congratulations. You’ve supported the narrower proposition that one group pays more federal tax on average than another. The much broader claim is still missing the evidence you keep insisting you’ve already provided. That’s the part you haven’t managed to finish yet bubba. You finally found one fact, puffed your chest out, and started strutting around like you’d conquered the county. Trouble is, that little fact still won’t carry the argument you’ve been riding it around on. All that crowing, and the saddle’s still empty baw.
This post was edited on 7/15/26 at 6:12 pm
Posted on 7/15/26 at 6:33 pm to CrystalPreserves
quote:
Higher average tax liability and lower average benefit use demonstrate a fiscal disparity. They do not demonstrate that one race “funds” another.
You are attempting to explain away the obvious.
If you have two entities. Both pulling from the same pool. And one entity has substantially higher revenue with less expenses and rhe other has small revenue with high expenses... and the duo runs at a loss.. which entity is carrying the load?
Posted on 7/15/26 at 6:45 pm to CleverUserName
Clever you cant talk common sense to Crystal cause. He is probably named Crystal (meth) cause that's what he is addicted too .
Even he couldn't believe all the BS he spouts.
Even he couldn't believe all the BS he spouts.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 6:58 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
You are attempting to explain away the obvious. If you have two entities. Both pulling from the same pool. And one entity has substantially higher revenue with less expenses and rhe other has small revenue with high expenses... and the duo runs at a loss.. which entity is carrying the load?
That’s a fine analogy. Now show that it actually describes reality.
You’ve assumed there are two financial entities, assumed they’re drawing from one measurable pool, assumed you’ve correctly measured each group’s revenue and expenses, and then declared the conclusion obvious.
Those assumptions are the argument. You haven’t demonstrated any of them.
That’s why you keep reaching for analogies instead of posting the ledger you’re talking about. An analogy can illustrate an argument. It can’t replace one.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 7:00 pm to TigerTiger12914
quote:
Clever you cant talk common sense to Crystal cause. He is probably named Crystal (meth) cause that's what he is addicted too . Even he couldn't believe all the BS he spouts.
That was a mighty long walk just to announce you didn’t understand the argument bubba.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 7:06 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
You’re delighting in middle aged women you will never know mocking black people on social media
She’s mocking segregationists on social media. Looks like we can put you down as a segregationist
Posted on 7/15/26 at 7:14 pm to CrystalPreserves
quote:
Those assumptions are the argument. You haven’t demonstrated any of them.
Most Americans aren’t aloof to who’s producing the revenue and who’s suctioning it. We use our eyes, and then our brain to make a logical assessment on the situation. Your empathy makes no difference, you just simply appear weak.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 7:44 pm to CrystalPreserves
Guess that college degree i worked so hard for was for nothing. NOT
Oh i Understood.
Just i disagree with you on pretty much anything.
Never read a post of yours yet i agreed with.
Why stop now.
But keep trying your 800,000 post might make sense. But i doubt it.
Oh i Understood.
Just i disagree with you on pretty much anything.
Never read a post of yours yet i agreed with.
Why stop now.
But keep trying your 800,000 post might make sense. But i doubt it.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 7:50 pm to TigerTiger12914
quote:
Guess that college degree i worked so hard for was for nothing. NOT Oh i Understood. Just i disagree with you on pretty much anything. Never read a post of yours yet i agreed with. Why stop now. But keep trying your 800,000 post might make sense. But i doubt it.
Well, your degree may be perfectly fine. It just didn’t make an appearance in that meth joke.
That’s all right. Not every man with an education feels obligated to use it.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 7:55 pm to thenza
quote:
This isn’t the way
Sometimes you need to push back. The coddling, double standards, and hypocrisy must be mocked over and over and over again until it is no longer acceptable in an open society to favor one race (black) over another.
We are in a cultural civil war here and I am hopeful that sanity will prevail.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 9:46 pm to CrystalPreserves
quote:
CrystalPreserves
It's apparent you're really a Trump supporter who is trolling because you have nothing better to do. Some advice, don't make it so obvious next time. Your responses, while ignorantly thought out, are too long. And don't do the cliches about saddles & calling people baw. It makes it more obvious.
I don't think you're as dumb as what you write. Are you?
Posted on 7/15/26 at 9:47 pm to Kraut Dawg
Yes in fact she is quite dumb
Posted on 7/15/26 at 11:35 pm to CrystalPreserves
well if you have one you sure don't use it.
Don't feel bad i married a Liberal and she cant distinguish between a Communist and Democrat either.
Don't feel bad i married a Liberal and she cant distinguish between a Communist and Democrat either.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 5:50 am to CrystalPreserves
quote:
You’ve assumed there are two financial entities, assumed they’re drawing from one measurable pool, assumed you’ve correctly measured each group’s revenue and expenses, and then declared the conclusion obvious.
There ARE to financial entities - the two groups.
They ARE drawing from the same pool - the totality of the tax paid to the treasury.
There was a large sample taken in the study, by a highly left leaning organization that had no interest in skewing the results in the way you want to claim, to show the outcome. Which was obviously reviewed to be included in the tax journal.
And yes... the conclusion is obvious.
You have been the one wanting "proof" so far. Now it's your turn. How about you stop sidestepping actual numbers given that you asked for.. and you provide your own? Unless you can't and you just want to further defend your programming by using denial and misdirection.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 5:57 am to TigerBaitOohHaHa
quote:
We are in a cultural civil war here and I am hopeful that sanity will prevail.
I'm not. At least on a national scale.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 6:39 am to TigerTiger12914
quote:
Don't feel bad i married a Liberal and she cant distinguish between a Communist and Democrat either
Funny. I married a lady who grew up in socialist Yugoslavia before coming here as a refugee in her mid-20's. She can definitely tell the difference between a Communist and a Democrat. She says this all the time: "they think they are selling either communism or socialism, but what they are selling is even worse".
Popular
Back to top


1



