Started By
Message

re: This space for white women only- it’s getting thousands of likes

Posted on 7/15/26 at 5:28 pm to
Posted by CrystalPreserves
Member since May 2019
4909 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.... when one group pays 5 times the tax (revenue) and consumes less """Earned"""" Income tax credit and federal handouts... they are funding the other. It's actually a very simple economic conclusion to make.


No, it’s a simple conclusion only if you ignore the parts that make it economics instead of bumper-sticker sociology.

Higher average tax liability and lower average benefit use demonstrate a fiscal disparity. They do not demonstrate that one race “funds” another. Taxes aren’t collected into racial accounts and redistributed along racial lines. They’re collected from individuals and businesses and spent according to tax law and program eligibility.
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
6707 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

The men here scroll Twitter

Watch it now. I don't even have Twitter.

On topic, I got nada. Don't much care about it. Was reading purely for entertainment
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
62307 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 5:50 pm to
The other posters here more than make up for your lack of engagement.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
59690 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

Remember FUBU - For Us By Us?

Farmers Useta Beat Us
Posted by CrystalPreserves
Member since May 2019
4909 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 6:05 pm to
Well, look at that baw. After several rounds of telling me to “infer” your assumptions, you finally posted some data. That’s a step in the right direction.

Now read your own links carefully. If those figures are accurate, they show a difference in average federal taxes paid by households in different racial categories. They do not show that one race “pays all the bills,” that the other race doesn’t contribute, who specifically finances whose Medicaid benefits, or that one race “needs” another infinitely more than the reverse. That’s the same leap I’ve been pointing out from the beginning.

And no, I didn’t “ignorantly dispute” your numbers. You hadn’t posted any. You made an assumption, declared yourself right, admitted the IRS didn’t provide the data, and told everyone else to infer the rest. Now you’ve finally brought numbers to the table, but they still don’t establish the conclusion you attached to them.

So congratulations. You’ve supported the narrower proposition that one group pays more federal tax on average than another. The much broader claim is still missing the evidence you keep insisting you’ve already provided. That’s the part you haven’t managed to finish yet bubba. You finally found one fact, puffed your chest out, and started strutting around like you’d conquered the county. Trouble is, that little fact still won’t carry the argument you’ve been riding it around on. All that crowing, and the saddle’s still empty baw.
This post was edited on 7/15/26 at 6:12 pm
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17940 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

Higher average tax liability and lower average benefit use demonstrate a fiscal disparity. They do not demonstrate that one race “funds” another.


You are attempting to explain away the obvious.

If you have two entities. Both pulling from the same pool. And one entity has substantially higher revenue with less expenses and rhe other has small revenue with high expenses... and the duo runs at a loss.. which entity is carrying the load?
Posted by TigerTiger12914
TEXAS
Member since Apr 2026
137 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 6:45 pm to
Clever you cant talk common sense to Crystal cause. He is probably named Crystal (meth) cause that's what he is addicted too .

Even he couldn't believe all the BS he spouts.
Posted by CrystalPreserves
Member since May 2019
4909 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

You are attempting to explain away the obvious. If you have two entities. Both pulling from the same pool. And one entity has substantially higher revenue with less expenses and rhe other has small revenue with high expenses... and the duo runs at a loss.. which entity is carrying the load?


That’s a fine analogy. Now show that it actually describes reality.

You’ve assumed there are two financial entities, assumed they’re drawing from one measurable pool, assumed you’ve correctly measured each group’s revenue and expenses, and then declared the conclusion obvious.

Those assumptions are the argument. You haven’t demonstrated any of them.

That’s why you keep reaching for analogies instead of posting the ledger you’re talking about. An analogy can illustrate an argument. It can’t replace one.
Posted by CrystalPreserves
Member since May 2019
4909 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

Clever you cant talk common sense to Crystal cause. He is probably named Crystal (meth) cause that's what he is addicted too . Even he couldn't believe all the BS he spouts.


That was a mighty long walk just to announce you didn’t understand the argument bubba.
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
19739 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

You’re delighting in middle aged women you will never know mocking black people on social media


She’s mocking segregationists on social media. Looks like we can put you down as a segregationist
Posted by boot
Member since Oct 2014
3461 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Those assumptions are the argument. You haven’t demonstrated any of them.



Most Americans aren’t aloof to who’s producing the revenue and who’s suctioning it. We use our eyes, and then our brain to make a logical assessment on the situation. Your empathy makes no difference, you just simply appear weak.
Posted by TigerTiger12914
TEXAS
Member since Apr 2026
137 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 7:44 pm to
Guess that college degree i worked so hard for was for nothing. NOT

Oh i Understood.

Just i disagree with you on pretty much anything.

Never read a post of yours yet i agreed with.

Why stop now.

But keep trying your 800,000 post might make sense. But i doubt it.
Posted by CrystalPreserves
Member since May 2019
4909 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

Guess that college degree i worked so hard for was for nothing. NOT Oh i Understood. Just i disagree with you on pretty much anything. Never read a post of yours yet i agreed with. Why stop now. But keep trying your 800,000 post might make sense. But i doubt it.


Well, your degree may be perfectly fine. It just didn’t make an appearance in that meth joke.

That’s all right. Not every man with an education feels obligated to use it.
Posted by TigerBaitOohHaHa
Member since Jan 2023
2198 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

This isn’t the way


Sometimes you need to push back. The coddling, double standards, and hypocrisy must be mocked over and over and over again until it is no longer acceptable in an open society to favor one race (black) over another.

We are in a cultural civil war here and I am hopeful that sanity will prevail.
Posted by Kraut Dawg
Member since Sep 2012
4796 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

CrystalPreserves

It's apparent you're really a Trump supporter who is trolling because you have nothing better to do. Some advice, don't make it so obvious next time. Your responses, while ignorantly thought out, are too long. And don't do the cliches about saddles & calling people baw. It makes it more obvious.

I don't think you're as dumb as what you write. Are you?
Posted by Rip Torner
Member since Jul 2023
3027 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 9:47 pm to
Yes in fact she is quite dumb
Posted by TigerTiger12914
TEXAS
Member since Apr 2026
137 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 11:35 pm to
well if you have one you sure don't use it.

Don't feel bad i married a Liberal and she cant distinguish between a Communist and Democrat either.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17940 posts
Posted on 7/16/26 at 5:50 am to
quote:

You’ve assumed there are two financial entities, assumed they’re drawing from one measurable pool, assumed you’ve correctly measured each group’s revenue and expenses, and then declared the conclusion obvious.


There ARE to financial entities - the two groups.

They ARE drawing from the same pool - the totality of the tax paid to the treasury.

There was a large sample taken in the study, by a highly left leaning organization that had no interest in skewing the results in the way you want to claim, to show the outcome. Which was obviously reviewed to be included in the tax journal.

And yes... the conclusion is obvious.

You have been the one wanting "proof" so far. Now it's your turn. How about you stop sidestepping actual numbers given that you asked for.. and you provide your own? Unless you can't and you just want to further defend your programming by using denial and misdirection.
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
23133 posts
Posted on 7/16/26 at 5:57 am to
quote:

We are in a cultural civil war here and I am hopeful that sanity will prevail.

I'm not. At least on a national scale.
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
6707 posts
Posted on 7/16/26 at 6:39 am to
quote:

Don't feel bad i married a Liberal and she cant distinguish between a Communist and Democrat either

Funny. I married a lady who grew up in socialist Yugoslavia before coming here as a refugee in her mid-20's. She can definitely tell the difference between a Communist and a Democrat. She says this all the time: "they think they are selling either communism or socialism, but what they are selling is even worse".
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram