Started By
Message

re: This is all you need to know about the SCOTUS hearing on birthright citizenship.

Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:44 am to
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16443 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:44 am to
quote:

There is no textual foundation for the idea the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution only applies to formerly enslaved people.


They had no idea that they needed to outlaw you transformers and pedophiles either.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26797 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:58 am to
quote:

quote:
If birthright citizenship was the point, that phrase would not be necessary

It is for the few exceptions

We don't have universal birthright citizenship. That phrase limits the population


It limits birthright citizenship to people who are here legally/lawfully.

The expression is that the phrase is "in your face" and it takes special effort to look beyond the phrase and ignore its meaning.
Posted by deuceiswild
South La
Member since Nov 2007
5005 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:03 am to
quote:

There is no textual foundation for the idea the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution only applies to formerly enslaved people. If that is all that the drafters wanted to do, they could have said that. But that is not what they wrote and certainly not what the states ratified.


I can actually accept this. I don't like it, but that's how it is.

My question though, is why do you seem so giddy about the way it is? Why do you come across as though you currently LIKE the way it is? Why would you be so adamant about changing things?
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
55738 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:07 am to
quote:

What does the text say?

There is no textual foundation for the idea the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution only applies to formerly enslaved people. If that is all that the drafters wanted to do, they could have said that. But that is not what they wrote and certainly not what the states ratified.


What was the original intent and purpose of the 14th amendment?
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
47837 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:13 am to
That is the only text that matters.

It’s ridiculous

About as ridiculous as all of your idiotic beliefs
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
55738 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Birthright citizenship is a scam.

this is true

quote:
It only benefits rich people who pay money to have their family and friends get a free green card

this is demonstrably false - IF that were the argument, the DEMOCRATs would be the ones objecting.


The PRIMARY 'benefit' of the current implementation goes to Democrats = that is why they oppose it so fervently - it would reduce their access of "ballot names"

DEMs ONLY desire is to enhance and protect election fraud.


It was only 10-15 years ago the vast majority of Democratic Socialists were staunchly against illegal immigration......my how quickly things have changed.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476688 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:20 am to
quote:

What was the original intent and purpose of the 14th amendment?

That is how leftists want to interpret the Constitution. They want to make it a living document and look at things like intent instead of the words of the statute or constitutional provision.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
89042 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:26 am to
quote:

My question though, is why do you seem so giddy about the way it is? Why do you come across as though you currently LIKE the way it is? Why would you be so adamant about changing things?


Don’t hold your breath for an answer. He can’t admit why. At least not honestly.
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
19485 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:28 am to
quote:


Roberts and ACB are worrying me right now.


Right now? They worry me all of the time. Roberts is definitely an owned man
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3691 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Now... that's (D)ifferent

Filth.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
19906 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:32 am to
quote:



Roberts and ACB are worrying me right now.




Nah, it's specific to slaves.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167441 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:33 am to
quote:

equal protection under the law to formerly enslaved people.
This is the bottom-line argument the govt (Trump) is making...

SCOTUS will pass the buck in a already beaten down to their bank accounts special interests, and blackmail----worthless body of congress critters.
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
33618 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:33 am to
quote:

There is no textual foundation for the idea the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution only applies to formerly enslaved people. If that is all that the drafters wanted to do, they could have said that. But that is not what they wrote and certainly not what the states ratified.
Leftist: “Unfortunately, the text is not specific on illegal immigrants or tourism births. Although the drafters of the 14th didn’t mean it to include these people, that’s what it does. It was poorly written.”

Righties: “Okay, I can sort of agree with that, so why don’t we amend the Constitution to rectify this?”

Leftist: “Oh hell no! We need more third world and Communist voters. Also, let’s discuss what I think the 2nd Amendment really means and change all of the gun laws.”
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
55738 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:34 am to
quote:

Roberts and ACB are worrying me right now.


Right now? They worry me all of the time. Roberts is definitely an owned man


I'm gonna go way out on a limb and make a bold assumption.

The lawmakers who drafted the 14th amendment had no idea their amendment would allow for and be used by the "enemies from within" to destroy the constitutional republic through mass illegal immigration. If those lawmakers could have envisioned how their amendment is being used today by the "enemies from within" they would have been much more restrictive on the definition of birthright citizenship.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
19305 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:39 am to
They didn’t have to deal with the democrat replacement theory or cartels transportation illegals.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59466 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:41 am to
quote:

What does the text say?


Awful argument. There are limitations to application of all of the amendments. Shall we go through them? You want to start with the 2nd?
Posted by GoldenGuy
Member since Oct 2015
12782 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:43 am to
quote:

What does the text say? There is no textual foundation for the idea the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution only applies to formerly enslaved people. If that is all that the drafters wanted to do, they could have said that. But that is not what they wrote and certainly not what the states ratified.


The entire debate is Rules as Written vs Rules as Intended.

And we know the court has often sided with RAI
Posted by wareaglepete
Union of Soviet Auburn Republics
Member since Dec 2012
18523 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:49 am to
quote:

Roberts and ACB are worrying me right now.


Roberts: Should always worry you. Either bought and paid for or blackmailed.

ACB: Just has too much of the old feels in her. Can't be trusted.
Posted by Bandit1980
God's Country
Member since Nov 2019
4613 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:56 am to
Why is it so important for the Dems to have all of these illegal aliens, birthright citizens, and whatever they are here to begin with?






Oh, I forgot...........................to strengthen their voting block.

But I'm just curious: how many Dems have illegals and birthrights and such living with them, since they care so much?
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
19305 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:58 am to
“ All persons born or naturalized in the”.

You could argue clearly that the point of stressing naturalized after born in was a clarification of actual people living here as their country, naturalization being the inclusion of slaves that we’re here but not considered actual citizens
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram