- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: They have taken over, by force, Trump Towers.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:28 pm to Tigertuxedo
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:28 pm to Tigertuxedo
Is he charged with any crimes?
2
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:28 pm to DWaginHTown
quote:
He should fire his security folks at that building for allowing that to happen.
How do you stop it? They just start walking in, which anyone can do, and the next thing you know there are 50 of them. You might answer that they should have taken out tasers and zapped them, but that’s just what they wanted, and for THAT Trump would fire them.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:28 pm to Indefatigable
quote:Whether Barney Fife or SS does the guarding? Sure.
Trespass on private property is a federal matter? Federalism right here, folks.quote:
A residence of the sitting POTUS is in that building. Has to have some impact on who runs the show, no?
Applicable property law, God I hope not. Talk about elitism and the Imperial Presidency …
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:30 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
he charged with any crimes?
Nope.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:31 pm to Tigertuxedo
quote:
Elon Musk is illegally shutting down agencies
Nope.
.
quote:
people who are protesting are somehow able to be deported and taking somewhere without their permission without committing a crime
Wrong again.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:31 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Applicable property law, God I hope not. Talk about elitism and the Imperial Presidency …
My thinking was that there would be superseding federal charges related to POTUS' residences, not just naked usurpation of State property law.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:32 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Applicable property law, God I hope not. Talk about elitism and the Imperial Presidency
No, we’re talking about suppressing an insurrection.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:33 pm to BCreed1
Sounds like some all-american baws need to show up and frick em up. I know that's what they want, and I'm getting tired of watching all of this. It's about time we return to the America that will punch anyone in the mouth.
If there is anyone with the last name Trump thst is in the building, I would say that it is.
quote:
Trespass on private property is a federal matter?
If there is anyone with the last name Trump thst is in the building, I would say that it is.
This post was edited on 3/13/25 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:35 pm to Tigertuxedo
quote:
Speaking of which. I thought right Wingers were all about the constitution. Funny how it doesn't seem like any of you are when Elon Musk is illegally shutting down agencies that are investigating his companies and people who are protesting are somehow able to be deported and taking somewhere without their permission without committing a crime. I guess you only get outraged whenever people trespass in someone's building that like, huh? Wow
Ah yes, the usual attempt to deflect instead of addressing the hypocrisy. So let’s break this down:
Elon Musk 'illegally shutting down agencies'? What actual laws were broken? Or do you just mean he's resisting politically motivated investigations? Because if we’re suddenly pretending government agencies are always impartial and righteous, that’s some next-level naivety.
Protesters being deported? Are you saying non-citizens who break laws shouldn't be subject to deportation? Because that’s literally how every country operates. Also, if these people didn’t commit a crime, what exactly were they arrested for? You can’t have it both ways.
Trespassing in a private building isn’t a crime now? Interesting, because last time I checked, breaking into a federal building on January 6th was treated like the crime of the century, and those people didn’t get the luxury of being bussed out and released elsewhere.
So which is it? Are laws supposed to apply equally, or only when it benefits your side?
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:36 pm to Penrod
quote:Penrod, I generally respect you as a poster, but that is just silly.
Applicable property law, God I hope not. Talk about elitism and the Imperial Presidencyquote:
No, we’re talking about suppressing an insurrection.
Those people are no more trying to overthrow the US government than are post-Super-Bowl rioters.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:36 pm to BCreed1
In addition to them being arrested, we also need to find out who is 1) organizing this, and 2) who is funding it.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:37 pm to BCreed1
I would seal the building and fill the lobby with killer bees.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:38 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Those people are no more trying to overthrow the US government than are post-Super-Bowl rioters.
o now we're comparing a coordinated, politically motivated takeover of private property to post-Super Bowl rioters? Come on. Super Bowl rioters aren’t backed by organized political groups, they aren’t traveling across state lines to send a political message, and they aren’t being framed as ‘activists’ by the media when they loot and destroy property.
If this were a group of people from the other side storming a building in the name of their cause, you'd be calling it an insurrection without hesitation. But since it fits your narrative, suddenly it’s just ‘rowdy behavior’ and ‘not that serious’?
Either breaking the law is breaking the law, or we’re playing favorites. Which is it?
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:39 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
Nope
Oh I guess all of those United States judges are wrong. Money that is appropriated by Congress is being messed with by the executive branch. That is unconstitutional no matter how you try to do mental gymnastics.
quote:
Wrong again.
I'm afraid you're about to go 0-2. It is certainly alarming and definitely illegal. If he was being arrested for a crime then why was he shipped all the way to Louisiana
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:41 pm to BCreed1
Ti.e to recall the Pinkerton detectives
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:45 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Those people are no more trying to overthrow the US government than are post-Super-Bowl rioters.
Of course they are not. The point was that neither were the Jan 6ers. No one is trying to overthrow the government by showing up at a demonstration without weapons.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 7:51 pm to Tigertuxedo
quote:
Oh I guess all of those United States judges are wrong. Money that is appropriated by Congress is being messed with by the executive branch. That is unconstitutional no matter how you try to do mental gymnastics.
Dude... you said ELON MUSK is doing it. He's not. Talk about mental gymnastics.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 8:21 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
That seems a bit harsh.
Agree, I was just answering a question of what it is.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 8:28 pm to Ebridg3
quote:It would certainly appear that the trespassers at Trump Tower were breaking the law.
Either breaking the law is breaking the law, or we’re playing favorites. Which is it?
But anyone who thinks that they were involved in an insurrection against the government of the United States ... that person is an idiot.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 8:33 pm to Penrod
quote:I agree, and I've said the same thing 100 times. They were LARPing and things got out of control. No more.
Those people are no more trying to overthrow the US government than are post-Super-Bowl rioters.quote:
Of course they are not. The point was that neither were the Jan 6ers. No one is trying to overthrow the government by showing up at a demonstration without weapons.
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News