- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

They can call it the How to Violate Multiple Constitutional Amendments Act.
Posted on 11/4/18 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 11/4/18 at 9:59 pm
The Trace
?
@teamtrace
Two New York lawmakers are drafting a bill that would allow authorities to review 3 years of social media history and 1 year of internet search history for anyone who wants to buy a gun. LINK
Posted on 11/4/18 at 10:10 pm to Jbird
But Trump is the one who’s fascist 
Posted on 11/4/18 at 10:19 pm to Jbird
Not only unconstitutional, but creepy as frick.
Posted on 11/4/18 at 10:20 pm to Jbird
You'll be able to buy a gun in just 3 short years!
Posted on 11/4/18 at 10:27 pm to Jbird
What would qualify in someone's search history to earn a "ban" from purchasing firearms?
"Hate speech"?
What's that?
If someone Googled: "The next man that makes a move, the n***** gets it." might just be looking up a scene from Blazing Saddles.
"Hate speech"?
What's that?
If someone Googled: "The next man that makes a move, the n***** gets it." might just be looking up a scene from Blazing Saddles.
Posted on 11/4/18 at 10:32 pm to Smeg
quote:
"The next man that makes a move, the n***** gets it." might just be looking up a scene from Blazing Saddles.
or checking out the lyrics of rap songs
Posted on 11/4/18 at 10:35 pm to Jbird
quote:
Two New York lawmakers are drafting a bill that would allow authorities to review 3 years of social media history and 1 year of internet search history for anyone who wants to buy a gun.
ALLOW, but not require. There would have to be multiple indicators hit before authorizing something like this.
Posted on 11/4/18 at 10:36 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
ALLOW, but not require
So it will be routine.
Posted on 11/4/18 at 10:47 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
How in the world would that not be infringing?
Posted on 11/4/18 at 10:52 pm to tenderfoot tigah
I get the idea behind it and it loosely makes sense to make sure a crazy person isn’t talking about killing people before buying a gun.,.. but like so many things, it would likely not prevent that and would just be targeting anyone who says anything the left doesn’t like from getting a gun
Posted on 11/4/18 at 10:54 pm to tenderfoot tigah
quote:
How in the world would that not be infringing?
How in the world are 'concealed carry licenses' not infringing? Also (rather large picture, but worth.)

This post was edited on 11/4/18 at 10:58 pm
Posted on 11/4/18 at 10:57 pm to Jbird
quote:Does porn disqualify you from buying a gun?
1 year of internet search history for anyone who wants to buy a gun.
Asking for a friend.
Posted on 11/4/18 at 11:24 pm to Jbird
quote:
and 1 year of internet search history for anyone who wants to buy a gun.
Well shite.
Posted on 11/4/18 at 11:25 pm to bhtigerfan
If your porn search doesn't contain gay and tranny porn you are a bigot and shouldn't own a gun...or so I've been told.
Posted on 11/4/18 at 11:28 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
ALLOW, but not require. There would have to be multiple indicators hit before authorizing something like this.
I just bet you’re dumb enough to believe that.
This post was edited on 11/4/18 at 11:31 pm
Posted on 11/4/18 at 11:32 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
There would have to be multiple indicators hit before authorizing something like this.
Republican? Check
White? Check
Male? Check
Gonna need a full social media and internet search check on this one
Posted on 11/4/18 at 11:37 pm to Jbird
This is so retarded that only libtards could conceive this.
Besides it being entirely unconstitutional, what the frick do you do about the many people who don't use social media, or don't have a computer?
And what criteria would they use to determine what would make someone ineligible to purchase a firearm?
These people should be tarred and feathered for this stupidity.
Besides it being entirely unconstitutional, what the frick do you do about the many people who don't use social media, or don't have a computer?
And what criteria would they use to determine what would make someone ineligible to purchase a firearm?
These people should be tarred and feathered for this stupidity.
Posted on 11/4/18 at 11:50 pm to Jbird
Search this: GFY, the Second Amendment Trumps your BS legislation.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:35 am to Jbird
quote:
1 year of internet search history for anyone who wants to buy a gun.
Guess you would have to do firearms research a year in advance because I can guarantee you if your search history is full of gun and bullet ballistic searches you will not be able to buy one.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:47 am to Armchair_QB
quote:
I just bet you’re dumb enough to believe that.
Oh I don't believe that for one second. Those are the conditions in which I would even CONSIDER such a piece of stupid legislation.
Popular
Back to top

14









