Started By
Message

re: There’s no evidence that a single ‘gay gene’ exists

Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:18 am to
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65786 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:18 am to
quote:

ok cool. this really has no place in this thread


We're talking about the reasons for people being gay, aren't we? The reason is they are tempted by sin and they submit to it. It's simple. There's never going to be a scientific answer to the question unless science finds a "temptation" gene.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476632 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:19 am to
quote:

We're talking about the reasons for people being gay, aren't we?

yes and your argument is "there can be a 100% biological reason for this but it's irrelevant b/c i believe it's in acting on those natural inclinations that you have issues". this thread is about the existence/cause, not the moral implications of acting on that established cause
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
68810 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:23 am to
It still doesn’t mean that homosexuality is a
conscious “choice”.
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
35322 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Read it again. It doesn't say what you seem to think it says.


It's a nebulous, scientifically meaningless "conclusion," as stated. I'm not saying science can't or won't discover (or perhaps already has) more than what that statement imparts. But the statement itself is not a scientific finding.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65786 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:26 am to
quote:

yes and your argument is "there can be a 100% biological reason for this but it's irrelevant b/c i believe it's in acting on those natural inclinations that you have issues"


That isn't what I said at all. I said "even if you believe they are born that way." The reality is there isn't any scientific evidence for that. It takes far more belief to reject the reality that science does not explain homosexuality.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24273 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:28 am to
quote:

but there is a biological component to who a man is attracted to and prefers to ave sexual relations with


More there’s a biological predisposition where in environmental factors can cause a man to develop sexual attraction to other men.

Your sexual abuse example is one of them.

Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28131 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:29 am to
quote:

yes and your argument is "there can be a 100% biological reason for this but it's irrelevant b/c i believe it's in acting on those natural inclinations that you have issues". this thread is about the existence/cause, not the moral implications of acting on that established cause



You can thank aced for introducing religion back on page one.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476632 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:29 am to
quote:

It still doesn’t mean that homosexuality is a
conscious “choice”.

yeah i think the "genetic" argument died out 10+ years ago

it's now considered to likely be epigenetic and/or hormonal

Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24273 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:30 am to
quote:

It still doesn’t mean that homosexuality is a
conscious “choice


It just means “born that way” is poppycock.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476632 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:31 am to
quote:

That isn't what I said at all.

that's literally what you said. your discussion is about acting out in deviance and not the cause of the deviance

acting out is irrelevant. we're talking about genesis in this thread
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476632 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:32 am to
quote:

More there’s a biological predisposition where in environmental factors can cause a man to develop sexual attraction to other men.

most likely, and most likely caused in utero or due to faulty genes misfiring and causing hormonal imbalances

i'm not saying that homosexuality isn't a biological malfunction and/or an outlier. i'm saying it's natural and biological
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
68810 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:33 am to
There are several theories, as I understand it. Credible medical and psychological authorities acknowledge that a person doesn’t just decide to be gay.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30551 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:34 am to
quote:

it's now considered to likely be epigenetic and/or hormonal


So you are saying the ghey can be prevented and/or cured if so desired?
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65786 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:35 am to
quote:

that's literally what you said. your discussion is about acting out in deviance and not the cause of the deviance

acting out is irrelevant. we're talking about genesis in this thread


I view the cause as the temptation, which is why I said science should focus on the temptation if it wants to find a "gay gene."
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24273 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:39 am to
quote:

There are several theories, as I understand it. Credible medical and psychological authorities acknowledge that a person doesn’t just decide to be gay.


For the conversation you seem determined to have you have to define “be gay”
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24273 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:43 am to
quote:

So you are saying the ghey can be prevented and/or cured if so desired


I don’t know how successful psychs are at curing anything, but they seem relatively successful at helping people deal with conditions.

The problem is the progressive mafia clutches pearls and hurls insults if you even imply it’s a dysfunction.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24273 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:45 am to
quote:

i'm saying it's natural and biological


I don’t think something that is so often the result of child abuse should be classified as “natural and biological “
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30551 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:47 am to
quote:

I don’t know how successful psychs are at curing anything


His comment did not as much suggest a psychological reason but more of an environment along with screwed up hormones as the root cause. If so, the environment can be altered or changed and hormonal imbalances can be treated effectively...

In other words, based on his assumption(s) you can cure gay if you so desire... So I was wondering if it was more of a disease in his mind...
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476632 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:48 am to
quote:

So you are saying the ghey can be prevented and/or cured if so desired?

i believe at some point this will be an option

i'm not one of those "IT'S NATURAL SO WE'RE THE NEW NORMAL" people like this guy

quote:

The ludicrous amount of coverage of a basically uninterpretable experiment suggests a surprising amount of interest in the basis of sexuality and I am even more irritated by this than I am by poor use of statistical analyses. I think of myself as a naturally curious person, it’s why I am a scientist. I wonder about loads of stuff all the time — how cell phone signals move, why dead dragonflies fade but butterflies don’t, why most people are more interested in life on Mars than in their own neighborhood. But with the exception of wondering what the Kardashians are up to, there is nothing that I am less curious about than why I am a lesbian. And I think that is very common. I know few gay people who waste any time on this. In contrast, it is almost always a straight person who asks this question of someone who is gay.

But here’s the thing. I have never heard a straight person wonder why they are straight. No matter how it’s dressed up, the question is always one of investigating the deviation from the norm. The defense that is usually put forward is that studies such as the recent one are just looking to explore the biological basis behind a range of human behaviors. But that position is both naïve and potentially dangerous.


we're a sexually reproducing species, so these "arguments" are incredibly silly (to the point of being dangerous)

my fear (and this goes beyond homosexuality) is that with this "victim culture", medicating away natural conditions will be attacked. it's whatever with homosexuality but when we're talking about severe mental illness? that's a major fricking worry.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476632 posts
Posted on 9/4/19 at 8:50 am to
quote:

I don’t think something that is so often the result of child abuse should be classified as “natural and biological “

EVEN THEN, the urges are biological in nature. the cause of that biological malfunction was abuse, however
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram