Started By
Message

re: There are no great mysteries surrounding the assassination of Charlie Kirk

Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:03 pm to
Posted by mudshuvl05
Member since Nov 2023
3060 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

What’s most dangerous is how this nonsense drowns out the real threat: the escalation of left-wing political violence.
This is the most important sentence in your post. This is what is so egregious about people doing what they're doing with the conspiracy theories: letting the democrat party off the hook.

If you want to see who an undercover left wing mouthpiece is (e.g., Candace Owens) and who's staunchly right wing (e.g., Nick Fuentes), then look at who's pushing a narrative to let the democrat party off the hook with nonsense conspiracies for Charlie Kirk's assassination.

A democrat murdered Charlie Kirk for wrongthink.

Period. End of story.
This post was edited on 12/6/25 at 8:04 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66256 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:05 pm to
The left has spent a lot of money in the podcast space. They’ve taken people like Candace, who present as right or right leaning but aren’t really and paid them a ton to push left wing talking points on targeted issues.
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
2523 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

Oh, bullshite.

You don't even know what the "official" narrative is yet.



Of course we do. The official narrative was created and hardened within 33 hours.

quote:

Just like crazy-arse Candace.


Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125360 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

Except that the entire narrative, event and "investigation" has been one big sloppy operation from A to Z -- and many people refuse to be gaslit by such nonsensical plot-lines, circumstances, coincidences, loose ends, and mythos. The only "misinfo" is catapulted by these kinds of hysterics that defend the "official" narrative 110%.


You’re too dumb to vote.
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
2523 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Explain this to me: When I shoot a whitetail 180-200lbs through the shoulder with a 30-06 round, it almost always has an exit wound.

Seriously, how did CK's neck stop a 30-06 round?


Don't you believe the coroner's report? *cough*

There also should have been splatters of blood all over the place and a lotta traumatized and shaken up people close to the action. Neither was the case.

All that said, let's just all drink the koolade, blame anti-Dentite Candice Owens for everything, and stop asking ridiculous, un-approved questions.
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
2523 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:15 pm to
Brutha, I really thought you had more sense than this.

Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125360 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 7:46 pm to
Tell me your theory.

Not what didn’t happen.
Tell me what did happen.

You can start with who shot Kirk.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
37602 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 8:04 pm to
There is no need for a grand conspiracy to kill someone like Charlie.
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
20455 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

Seriously, how did CK's neck stop a 30-06 round?
Since you’re being actually serious it seems here you go.

I’ll start with the unedited video, which unfortunately I’ve seen, but I had to look when I had hope he could survive it and he wasn’t confirmed dead.

The human body reaction to a wound, particularly the throat is for the hands to come up to the wound. If you saw the Kennedy assassination the first wound to the throat his hands come up to his throat. Charlie’s arms go rigid, the nerve impulses from the brain aren’t getting to this limbs which is why he goes rigid. That indicates the bullet hits him in the spine.

Thats consistent with the medical information released. That the bullet hit him in the spine and deflected, remaining in his body.

Even if he hadn’t bled out, the spinal injury would have killed him.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10470 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

Of course we do. The official narrative was created and hardened within 33 hours.


You know probably 1/8th of the evidence that will be introduced at trial.

You know squat.
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
18137 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

She’s not crazy, she’s being paid to say this stuff. Owens has always whored herself for money regardless of which side is paying.



Basically. I lol whenever I see someone speak of her love and friendship in regards to Charlie, as she's actively tearing apart everything he left behind.

Imo, a pro-Palestinian group gave her an assload of money a couple years ago, and that explains her drastic change. She has always been someone who will go to the highest bidder. Most people with big platforms are like that.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram