- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Theory: Paddock was a CIA Operative that went crazy after CIA indoctrination- Bourne esq.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:23 pm
That’s my theory.
No social media profile
No real sources of income except gambling and real estate l
Used to work in some type of federal agency
Radio / Tv/ print silence on every aspect of the worst mass murder in American history
No video of him going in or out of the hotel released at all
**shite, I just saw a cell video of the truck driver in NYC just now on Fox News- about 1.5 hours since the act
This guy was a CIA covert op that went rogue and now they don’t know how to explain him without blowing the cover of the program he was in and/ or covering their asses.
Media is complicit in the coverup because as we have seen the CIA has operatives in the media ( See JFK Files just released)
Tell me I’m wrong...this is as plausible as anything else we really know about the killer
Tin foil hat [ON] OFF
No social media profile
No real sources of income except gambling and real estate l
Used to work in some type of federal agency
Radio / Tv/ print silence on every aspect of the worst mass murder in American history
No video of him going in or out of the hotel released at all
**shite, I just saw a cell video of the truck driver in NYC just now on Fox News- about 1.5 hours since the act
This guy was a CIA covert op that went rogue and now they don’t know how to explain him without blowing the cover of the program he was in and/ or covering their asses.
Media is complicit in the coverup because as we have seen the CIA has operatives in the media ( See JFK Files just released)
Tell me I’m wrong...this is as plausible as anything else we really know about the killer
Tin foil hat [ON] OFF
This post was edited on 10/31/17 at 4:24 pm
8
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:23 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
Tell me I’m wrong
You're wrong
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:25 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
No social media profile
I must know a lot of potential CIA agents then
quote:
Used to work in some type of federal agency
i don't think you appreciate how unsophisticated and unqualified the average IRS "Agent" is
quote:
Radio / Tv/ print silence on every aspect of the worst mass murder in American history
what?
There are obviously a lot questions regarding Paddock and I understand people's skepticism towards the official story (or lack thereof), but you haven't done your homework here.
This post was edited on 10/31/17 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:25 pm to Covingtontiger77
You’re wrong
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:37 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
Tin foil hat [ON] OFF
The helicopter picking up multiple shooters.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 4:41 pm to Covingtontiger77
If you want to make up a theory, this is how I would go:
Paddock was radicalized and known to authorities. The reason for memory holing this is because no one wants to come out and say that he was a known radical. If you want to get deep into it, then you could theorize that some agency had actionable intel on Paddock but failed to act on it or pass it on to local authorities. However, if he was a known radical, it is more likely that our cumbersome intel setup couldn't get the left hand talking to the right hand to make anything of the intel or they just simply didn't take him seriously.
Paddock was radicalized and known to authorities. The reason for memory holing this is because no one wants to come out and say that he was a known radical. If you want to get deep into it, then you could theorize that some agency had actionable intel on Paddock but failed to act on it or pass it on to local authorities. However, if he was a known radical, it is more likely that our cumbersome intel setup couldn't get the left hand talking to the right hand to make anything of the intel or they just simply didn't take him seriously.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 5:07 pm to rds dc
Here's my theory:
Paddock was an arms dealer. He used the casino as a place to operate from, and to launder his money. He had someone at the casino working with him to take care of cameras and to help with the laundering.
Muslim terrorists, of course knew of a potential source of weapons in the US. Since it was an open secret where he would be, with merchandise, someone noticed that a whole bunch of infidels just happened to be a guy who had weapons and some nice places to shoot from.
The Muslims arrange a buy, kill Paddock, murder a bunch of people with Paddock's weapons, then leave.
Paddock was an arms dealer. He used the casino as a place to operate from, and to launder his money. He had someone at the casino working with him to take care of cameras and to help with the laundering.
Muslim terrorists, of course knew of a potential source of weapons in the US. Since it was an open secret where he would be, with merchandise, someone noticed that a whole bunch of infidels just happened to be a guy who had weapons and some nice places to shoot from.
The Muslims arrange a buy, kill Paddock, murder a bunch of people with Paddock's weapons, then leave.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 5:46 pm to Sunbeam
quote:
Paddock was an arms dealer.
I'm confused. Was Paddock selling some of the 33 guns that he legally purchased and could be traced back to him or was he selling illegal weapons? If he had a source of illegal weapons, why buy legal ones?
The theory of Paddock being an arms dealer is based on him a lot of guns in the room? Come on guys...
Posted on 10/31/17 at 5:51 pm to AintBigButItsPretty
quote:
The theory of Paddock being an arms dealer is based on him a lot of guns in the room? Come on guys...
Well, can you tell me definitively that all the weapons found in that room were legal?
Posted on 10/31/17 at 5:54 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
No video of him going in or out of the hotel released at all
Has anyone even attempted an explanation for why this is so?
Posted on 10/31/17 at 6:00 pm to Covingtontiger77
There is precedent.
But that's a little too
for me! 
But that's a little too
for me! 
Posted on 10/31/17 at 6:09 pm to Sunbeam
If you were going to supply somebody with weapons, you wouldn't sell them new guns that you purchased in your own name.
Those would be the easiest to trace right back to you,it's like 3 steps manufacture->distributor->dealer->buyer.
It's a bit more difficult with used weapons.
If he was a weapons supplier,then he was a very dumb one.
Those would be the easiest to trace right back to you,it's like 3 steps manufacture->distributor->dealer->buyer.
It's a bit more difficult with used weapons.
If he was a weapons supplier,then he was a very dumb one.
Posted on 10/31/17 at 6:29 pm to Covingtontiger77
I had this theory the other day too, I told someone who is usually receptive to conspiracy theories that this guy was essentially a James Bond/black ops specislist that went nuts.
The case is so bewildering, and makes zero sense... the Gov't is cleary holding back evidence.. Plus the security guard, etc.
This story is straight out of a Bourne novel.
The case is so bewildering, and makes zero sense... the Gov't is cleary holding back evidence.. Plus the security guard, etc.
This story is straight out of a Bourne novel.
This post was edited on 10/31/17 at 6:29 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News