- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The White House put out another tweet calling Twitter a publisher and not a platform
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:17 am
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:17 am
quote:
The White House
@WhiteHouse
The President did not glorify violence. He clearly condemned it.
@Jack
and Twitter's biased, bad-faith "fact-checkers" have made it clear: Twitter is a publisher, not a platform.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:18 am to Contra
Anyone know what it would take to get Twitter labeled a publisher?
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:19 am to Contra
YEPPERS
GEOTUS GAVE THEM ENOUGH ROPE AND THEY HUNG THEMSELVES!
GEOTUS GAVE THEM ENOUGH ROPE AND THEY HUNG THEMSELVES!
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:20 am to Contra
Question:
Twitter becomes publisher
Liable for users speech
Do they have legal grounds for civil action against the user who made the defamatory/slanderous post?
Twitter becomes publisher
Liable for users speech
Do they have legal grounds for civil action against the user who made the defamatory/slanderous post?
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:21 am to Contra
Jack brought a bag of rocks to a gun fight
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:22 am to jatilen
No one has clearly stated what the actual process is though to revoke 230 status.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:23 am to bmy
quote:
Twitter becomes publisher
Liable for users speech
Do they have legal grounds for civil action against the user who made the defamatory/slanderous post?
Who would care about Twitter once Trump bails them
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:24 am to SDVTiger
would love to see twatter crash and burn.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:28 am to bmy
quote:And does publishing Iranian officials violate sanctions and constitute doing business illegally?
Question:
Twitter becomes publisher
Liable for users speech
Do they have legal grounds for civil action against the user who made the defamatory/slanderous post?
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:29 am to guy4lsu
quote:
Anyone know what it would take to get Twitter labeled a publisher?
That's the funny part.
No one has to label them as a publisher. They do it to themselves already.
You can't say you're a fish while you are climbing trees.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:29 am to SDVTiger
quote:
quote:
Twitter becomes publisher
Liable for users speech
Do they have legal grounds for civil action against the user who made the defamatory/slanderous post?
Who would care about Twitter once Trump bails them
Probably the 318 million active Twitter users before he became president. Y’all act like he invented social media.
This post was edited on 5/29/20 at 10:30 am
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:30 am to guy4lsu
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:34 am to ShortyRob
quote:
You can't say you're a fish while you are climbing trees.
Dude, have you not been paying attention. You can call yourself whatever you want now.
quote:
In a recent episode of Slightly Offens*ve, Elijah Schaffer offered a "daily dose" of madness as he discussed a new member of the Twitch moderation team: a transgender who identifies as a deer and who openly threatened to ban Twitch users with less "diverse" opinions.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:38 am to Sidicous
quote:
And does publishing Iranian officials violate sanctions and constitute doing business illegally?
Another good question
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:39 am to jadam0613
quote:
Probably the 318 million active Twitter users
While there are several, LOL if you think it is that many.
Twitter is on the the final ride as Gen Z comes into their on. Same goes for Facebook, which is a cesspool of Boomers, GenX and GenY.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:39 am to ShortyRob
quote:
No one has to label them as a publisher. They do it to themselves already.
how so? i'm dumb so i don't know what any of this means.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:40 am to bmy
quote:
Do they have legal grounds for civil action against the user who made the defamatory/slanderous post?
They should add a defense and indemnification clause to the TOS. Go after solvent users who get them sued
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:46 am to Contra
All of this going on and the irony is, if not for Trump, Twitter likely would have died off years ago.
It was on the ropes and his prominence on it, being the largest followed in the US, and the amount of talk around it has fueled its resurgence.
It was on the ropes and his prominence on it, being the largest followed in the US, and the amount of talk around it has fueled its resurgence.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 10:49 am to DarthRebel
quote:
While there are several, LOL if you think it is that many.
Twitter is on the the final ride as Gen Z comes into their on. Same goes for Facebook, which is a cesspool of Boomers, GenX and GenY.
It actually is closer to 330 million now.
Twitter usage statistics
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News