- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The U.S. Supreme Court blocks President Trump from deporting Venezuelan Aliens
Posted on 5/17/25 at 10:51 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 5/17/25 at 10:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Note: there is still no invasion
False
And you know it. By the way how I quoted you wasn't an accident. I stopped where I stopped on purpose
Nothing in the word invasion requires that it be armed or even violent. You know that. My house got invaded by ants last week.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 11:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Exactly. Good job telling everyone you're intentionally avoiding some very damning questions
Do you hear something?
Has there ever been a court ruling you disagree with?
Posted on 5/17/25 at 11:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Would not be a concern.
It’s not a concern for jagoff lawyers. You’re insulated from real life.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 11:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Is this like the "more rights" and "less rights" that doesn't exist in the 14th?
Our Constitution even has specific amendments and protections for criminals
"Has there ever been a court ruling you disagree with?
Posted on 5/17/25 at 11:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:This is actually untrue. Since the 14th doesn't guarantee illegals rights like you think it does, they can be deported with impunity, as is being done and should be done. You absolutely can suspend habeas for illegals because there is nothing that guarantees them habeas in the first place. But I totally get that you don't understand that.
The individuals in the case are irrelevant
"Has there ever been a court ruling you disagree with?
Posted on 5/17/25 at 11:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:808 told you one of the farcical outcomes of your stupid legal delusions. Moreover, it seems pretty clear from the last election that most citizens disagree with your political stance that illegals should be allowed to game the system and that is why things are playing out as they are.
Your nihilism is noted
This is a crisis and Trump is exercising duly elected responsibilities to deal with it. Your judicial imagination lives in fantasy land while illegals are being deported in reality as it should be
You and the sycophants are couching your political leaning behind a thinly veiled doomcast that this could spill over to citizens losing rights. It's laughable and juvenile
Posted on 5/17/25 at 11:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:None of this has anything to do with anything. As usual, you're trying to get people lost in the weeds.
What is your alternative to a society based on laws, exactly? How would you structure that society and what institutions/processes would exist to apply the morality standard you project in these discussions?
Citizens are in no way in danger of losing their rights
"Has there ever been a court ruling you disagree with?
Posted on 5/17/25 at 11:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You still didn't answer the question
"Has there ever been a court ruling you disagree with?
Posted on 5/17/25 at 11:28 am to antibarner
quote:
Fine. Just deport them anyway as illegal aliens.Nothing says we can't send them to El Salvador.
Exactly, follow the law and give those people a chance in court. Then, no one would have a problem with this.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 11:36 am to jeff5891
quote:
Then, no one would have a problem with this.
You’ll believe what you’re told. If you’re told to have a problem, you’ll have a problem.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 11:37 am to jeff5891
quote:
Exactly, follow the law and give those people a chance in court. Then, no one would have a problem with this.
"Those people" are illegal aliens.
Maybe they can get a totally fair a-hole like this judge to hear their cases
Posted on 5/17/25 at 12:33 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
False
Look at what we have here. A failure of language.
This post was edited on 5/17/25 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 5/17/25 at 12:34 pm to the808bass
quote:
It’s not a concern for jagoff lawyers.
It's not a concern because lawyers, jagoff or not, couldn't stop it, just as they're not stopping it as I type.
quote:
You’re insulated from real life.
The irony
Posted on 5/17/25 at 12:47 pm to John Barron
Need to deport all but two of the Supreme Court Justices. About 90 % of the Attorneys practicing Law.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:22 pm to jeff5891
quote:
Exactly, follow the law and give those people a chance in court. Then, no one would have a problem with this.
They have invaded our nation, and are dangerous, so this is liberal nonsense
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Because there was no issue for judges to decide because it wasn't illegal.
Dereliction of duty
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:34 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Dereliction of duty
No
Stop embarrassing yourself
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
These cases aren't about "siding with rapists and murderers".
These cases enable rapists and murderers, so they ultimately they are as they have very real consequences that liberals and RINOS are okay with.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:38 pm to djsdawg
quote:
These cases enable rapists and murderers, so they ultimately they are
No. The individuals are irrelevant to the legal arguments.
Popular
Back to top


1







