Started By
Message

re: The TWA 800 Whistleblower Is Legit

Posted on 8/12/22 at 6:16 pm to
Posted by JackieTreehorn
Malibu
Member since Sep 2013
29070 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 6:16 pm to
I don’t doubt the US government doing anything evil. They will do anything.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
98935 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

And it was on Bill Clinton’s watch. Of course they covered it up.


Probably bombed an aspirin factory for good measure.
Posted by Speckhunter2012
Lake Charles
Member since Dec 2012
5808 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

If it was a Navy test missile, I think the secret would get out. A terrorist group using a US made Stinger against us in the mid 90's, that might get buried.


I have always thought this here. Witnesses saw streak headed up prior to explosion.

I did not know of Navy maneuvers in the same area though
Posted by LakeCharles
USA
Member since Oct 2016
5054 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

If this was legit more than 1 person would have leaked it

Multiple ships, probably thousands of sailors

You can keep that many people quiet? Nope

Obviously, you are not familiar with the event. There was a Navy helicopter crew that was filmed by local news saying that the Navy had shot down the plane. An investigator took a piece of a seat cushion from the wreckage and had it analyzed with rocket propellant being found on it. Hundreds of witnesses saw a rocket hit the plane.

All we ever got was "conspiracy theory" and "center fuel tank goes boom".

Posted by stuckintexas
austin
Member since Sep 2009
2092 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

If this was legit more than 1 person would have leaked it

Multiple ships, probably thousands of sailors

You can keep that many people quiet? Nope


I used to think that about 9/11. Check my post history, I had personal reasons for thinking it wasn't possible, but I also had your same reasoning. The more we're seeing abuse of power out in the open, the more I believe the US Govt and deep state is capable of anything.
Posted by Beaver Bandit
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2015
655 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 7:43 pm to
Eyewitness Major Fred Meyer, a Ret. Helo pilot says he saw a surface to air missile hit the jet. Not sure about anyone else, but I sure as hell would not insert myself into a major ordeal like that and lie about it. Why risk your reputation and invite all the bs that comes with it. I'm inclined to believe him.

Eyewitness TWA 800 YouTube
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
24890 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

Why the huge coverup if it was an accident?


Shooting down a civilian airliner is sort of frowned upon. And if no one knows, no one can be on the hook for the bill.

You think this stuff never happens?


Posted by TDFreak
Dodge Charger Aficionado
Member since Dec 2009
7368 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

Usually if an accident is mechanically related, modifications are made on the equipment. It didn't happen with the 747.
From my memory, I think they did ground all affected aircraft and fix the purported “spark issue” by implementing a nitrogen blanket in the tank vapor space.

But, it is equally believable that that fancy fix too was an elaborate charade to coverup what really occurred. When you go all in on a lie, you gotta stay all in no matter the cost.
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
22729 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

Leyte Gulf didn't have blue training missiles. She had a vertical launch missile system. The blue birds are used on ship with single and twin rail launchers where the missiles are loaded on the rail before firing. The guy is full of shite. I was on WAINWRIGHT CG 28, MOBILE BAY CG53 and HUE CITY CG66.


Help me understand this. Are you saying cruisers don’t use these “blue birds”? Or that cruisers don’t have a training missile solution at all?
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35391 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

I’ve never believed we got an adequate explanation on this one, but this seems too far fetched. Isn’t this the one that was flying east over the Long Island Sound? Why would a Navy ship fire on an aircraft that was clearly coming from the continental US? Doesn’t make sense.
Agree. I always thought this was a terrorist attack like a shoe bomber that got covered up. A small charge right above the fuel take would look a lot like the fuel tank explosion they came up with.

In the first few days of recovering parts there was a brief news story that explosive residue was found inside the cabin.
Posted by stuckintexas
austin
Member since Sep 2009
2092 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

a terrorist attack like a shoe bomber

One douchebag comes up with this idea and now we all gotta go barefoot in the airport...

quote:

explosive residue was found inside the cabin.


Yeah. From the missile that hit it.
Posted by GoldenGuy
Member since Oct 2015
10873 posts
Posted on 8/12/22 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

So were they supposed to be using "blue" training missiles, but instead used "white" live fire missiles?


I too think Alec Baldwin is an innocent man
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram