- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/27/18 at 2:58 pm to Dr_Tim_Whatley
quote:
everybody from NASA to the god damn weather channel is on it
Follow...the...money.
Why aren't these folks harping - day after day, week after week, month after month (etc.) how we're actually polluting the environment - they're not even focusing on greenhouse gases as a category - just 1 - CO2.
Why? Because that's a proxy for energy. If you can tax/regulate energy, you can tax/regulate effectively ANY human activity.
CO2 is NOT a pollutant. It is a trace atmospheric gas REQUIRED for life as we know it to exist on this planet. If anything a little too little CO2 would be a much, much bigger problem than a little too much.
This post was edited on 2/27/18 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 2/27/18 at 3:04 pm to indianswim
No, it does.
Posted on 2/27/18 at 3:08 pm to Cruiserhog
Cute little graphic.
So, exactly what do they mean by "immediate massive action to limit emissions"?
Or better still, what do YOU think it means?
So, exactly what do they mean by "immediate massive action to limit emissions"?
Or better still, what do YOU think it means?
Posted on 2/27/18 at 3:08 pm to tarzana
And if the poles are beginning a gradual shift?
Nothing in the universe mankind could do to change it
Nothing in the universe mankind could do to change it
Posted on 2/27/18 at 3:25 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:
So, exactly what do they mean by "immediate massive action to limit emissions"?
immediate massive redistribution of wealth of course.
Posted on 2/27/18 at 3:26 pm to olddawg26
Ok, thank you for acknowledging that. I read his reply and felt that aptly addressed the OP on that front.
Posted on 2/27/18 at 3:39 pm to tarzana
quote:
China
Can you point me to US cities like this
Posted on 2/27/18 at 3:40 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
I've never understood the anti-environment tendencies of the right
There it is
"Disagree with me and you're anti environmental"Posted on 2/27/18 at 3:56 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
some of you Cretans might actually grasp this
I doubt anybody from Crete visits this site
Posted on 2/27/18 at 3:58 pm to Contra
quote:
Good! frick the North Pole.
Did Santa not bring you that Red Ryder Carbine Action 200-shot Range Model air rifle you wanted???
Posted on 2/27/18 at 4:00 pm to tarzana
Posted on 2/27/18 at 4:10 pm to olddawg26
quote:
No but we can affect it
In extremely insignificant ways. The best thing to do is prepare for warmer weather.
More chicks in shorts and bikini tops is A-OK by me.
Posted on 2/27/18 at 5:06 pm to tarzana
Yea they moved all those factories overseas to escape American environmental policy and gain slave labor. It's funny you didn't figure it out that by Trump bringing it back to a more controlled arena it would actually help reduce pollution world wide. Typical stupidity you see from those who enroll in group think propaganda.
Posted on 2/27/18 at 5:49 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
by posting stupid questions like this its readily apparent you havent the slightest clue about the science behind climate change and why the posting of....
'the climate has always been changing'
is nothing more than the trumpets greeting your ignorance arriving to the thread
Ah, the baleful cry of the ad hominem attack from the left. Makes me nostalgic for 2016.
OK, Zeke, so my contention that there have been massive changes in climate over time is wrong? History is clear that there have been huge cycles of heat and cold. The data being collected now indicates we are well outside any norm on CO2e inventory. These are not in contradiction, yet the direct correlation and eventual fallout is also not completely known. Estimates and predictions are regularly revised as we learn more. Accepting the inevitability of what has been published so far is both ignorant and dangerous.
Note that I am NOT saying that anthropogenic change is not occurring now, and possibly at a dangerous pace.
Don't lump me in with "deniers" because I make one joke that just happens to have a nugget of relevant truth. Keep your "righteous indignation" powder dry for when you have a clue what the person you are attacking actually thinks.
This post was edited on 2/27/18 at 6:00 pm
Posted on 2/27/18 at 6:10 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:There are many questions this cretin would raise regarding dubious assertions in your graphic
some of you Cretans might actually grasp this
Page 5 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News