- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The level of disinformation is legitimately getting spooky to me
Posted on 12/16/16 at 6:58 pm
Posted on 12/16/16 at 6:58 pm
I have traveled enough to see real propaganda from the media. Until this year, I would never have put the US media in this category. Biased? Yes. Manipulative? Individually, yes. System wide "programming"? Couldn't get there.
I am starting to think otherwise. The tweet from Donna Brazile about the Russians undermining our democracy got me digging around on some of the threads shooting off from it. One was (inevitably) about her passing questions along to HRC. One post called the whole thing "fake news", and linked to Snopes. Yeah, I know, Snopes will color everything blue whenever it can. Until I read this, though, I just considered it typical selective interpretation. This entry, though, is just so over the top in both syntax and premise that I could not believe what I was reading.
I swear, it's like I felt a sudden urge to start playing solitaire.
I am starting to think otherwise. The tweet from Donna Brazile about the Russians undermining our democracy got me digging around on some of the threads shooting off from it. One was (inevitably) about her passing questions along to HRC. One post called the whole thing "fake news", and linked to Snopes. Yeah, I know, Snopes will color everything blue whenever it can. Until I read this, though, I just considered it typical selective interpretation. This entry, though, is just so over the top in both syntax and premise that I could not believe what I was reading.
quote:
The above-quoted story is a piece of fake news from a relatively new fake news site.
quote:
This fake news story about the first presidential debate was a complete fabrication and is unrelated to later claims that Donna Brazile might have provided the Clinton campaign previews of questions to be asked at much earlier Democratic primary (i.e., non-presidential) events.
I swear, it's like I felt a sudden urge to start playing solitaire.
This post was edited on 12/16/16 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:02 pm to Ag Zwin
On the bright side, everyone understands they are making things up
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:03 pm to Ag Zwin
The media isn't laughing anymore!
Look who runs corporate America, it is the international clique that wants money and power at all costs.
Look who runs corporate America, it is the international clique that wants money and power at all costs.
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:08 pm to Ag Zwin
We are going to learn that the new 'fact checking' industry is going to be as big a bunch
of fraudulent propagandist as the the so called fake news that they are trying to correct.
of fraudulent propagandist as the the so called fake news that they are trying to correct.
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:08 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
On the bright side, everyone understands they are making things up
I wish.
It amazes me how often I have to enlighten people using the wisdom and insight we share among ourselves on this board.
Don't kind yourself. We are in a bubble of our own here. It's a righteous bubble, and may be the last hope of mankind, but we are the minority.
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:13 pm to Ag Zwin
Yeah, the Big 6 have finally realized they no longer really control the media anymore, so they're doing everything in their power to lie to the American public to make them rely on mainstream media.
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:20 pm to Ag Zwin
The msm have only themselves to blame.
They created this when they decided to sell out their objectivity and credibility to become propaganda shills for the Democrat Party.
Everybody knows it now. They can never go back. They can only attempt to stifle which will fail and further their descent.
There is literally no difference between outfits like NPR and banana republic state media.
They created this when they decided to sell out their objectivity and credibility to become propaganda shills for the Democrat Party.
Everybody knows it now. They can never go back. They can only attempt to stifle which will fail and further their descent.
There is literally no difference between outfits like NPR and banana republic state media.
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:54 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:
It's a righteous bubble, and may be the last hope of mankind, but we are the minority.
I understand what you mean, but it may not tell the whole story. The people on political blogs, message boards etc, are some of the most dedicated to the information, that doesn't account for the masses who stand for the principles, but are mostly unnoticed.
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:55 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
We are going to learn that the new 'fact checking' industry is going to be as big a bunch of fraudulent propagandist as the the so called fake news that they are trying to correct.
Only low information people believe Snopes and Politifact. I am pretty sure they are 2 of the 4 organizations that will be on the "Fake News Police" force.
The left is like that sad drunk guy at the blackjack table who keeps losing and taking more cash out of the atm and losing and repeat.
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:02 pm to Ag Zwin
Get ready, it will get worse.
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:06 pm to tennvol
quote:
Get ready, it will get worse.
This. The next four years is going to be a bloodbath.
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:15 pm to Ag Zwin
Western Civilization has a disease.
Look around Marxist circles and you'll figure it out.
We need chemotherapy.
Look around Marxist circles and you'll figure it out.
We need chemotherapy.
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:15 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:
complete fabrication and is unrelated to later claims that Donna Brazile might have provided the Clinton campaign previews of questions to be asked at much earlier Democratic primary (i.e., non-presidential) events.
Unless I'm mistaken, this is actually correct. I was under the impression that Donna leaked questions to Hill for her debate with Bernie.
I've never heard anything about Donna leaking Hillary questions for the Presidential debate against Trump.
Correct me If I'm wrong...
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:20 pm to Chuker
Ain't no MIGHT about it. She did leak.
This post was edited on 12/16/16 at 8:21 pm
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:35 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:
The above-quoted story is a piece of fake news from a relatively new fake news site
Unbelievable levels of bullshite.
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:41 pm to Stingray
quote:
She did leak.
But did she leak questions against Bernie or Tump? Or both?
This post was edited on 12/16/16 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:56 pm to Chuker
I believe this article was from before Wikileaks, and I think it was later updated. I think it's talking about a story written before we found out the actual fact about brazille.
Posted on 12/16/16 at 9:01 pm to Chuker
quote:
Unless I'm mistaken, this is actually correct. I was under the impression that Donna leaked questions to Hill for her debate with Bernie.
At best, a distinction without a difference. The last part of the text is the WTF phrase. Are primaries for the presidential nomination "non-presidential"?
Posted on 12/16/16 at 9:06 pm to Ag Zwin
You pinpointed what I think is the updated part of the article.
My hypothesis was correct.
My hypothesis was correct.
This post was edited on 12/16/16 at 9:07 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News