Started By
Message
locked post

The level of disinformation is legitimately getting spooky to me

Posted on 12/16/16 at 6:58 pm
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
19936 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 6:58 pm
I have traveled enough to see real propaganda from the media. Until this year, I would never have put the US media in this category. Biased? Yes. Manipulative? Individually, yes. System wide "programming"? Couldn't get there.

I am starting to think otherwise. The tweet from Donna Brazile about the Russians undermining our democracy got me digging around on some of the threads shooting off from it. One was (inevitably) about her passing questions along to HRC. One post called the whole thing "fake news", and linked to Snopes. Yeah, I know, Snopes will color everything blue whenever it can. Until I read this, though, I just considered it typical selective interpretation. This entry, though, is just so over the top in both syntax and premise that I could not believe what I was reading.

quote:

The above-quoted story is a piece of fake news from a relatively new fake news site.


quote:

This fake news story about the first presidential debate was a complete fabrication and is unrelated to later claims that Donna Brazile might have provided the Clinton campaign previews of questions to be asked at much earlier Democratic primary (i.e., non-presidential) events.



I swear, it's like I felt a sudden urge to start playing solitaire.


This post was edited on 12/16/16 at 7:10 pm
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45210 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:02 pm to
On the bright side, everyone understands they are making things up
Posted by zatetic
Member since Nov 2015
5677 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:03 pm to
The media isn't laughing anymore!

Look who runs corporate America, it is the international clique that wants money and power at all costs.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67772 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:08 pm to
We are going to learn that the new 'fact checking' industry is going to be as big a bunch
of fraudulent propagandist as the the so called fake news that they are trying to correct.
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
19936 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

On the bright side, everyone understands they are making things up


I wish.

It amazes me how often I have to enlighten people using the wisdom and insight we share among ourselves on this board.

Don't kind yourself. We are in a bubble of our own here. It's a righteous bubble, and may be the last hope of mankind, but we are the minority.

Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108148 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:13 pm to
Yeah, the Big 6 have finally realized they no longer really control the media anymore, so they're doing everything in their power to lie to the American public to make them rely on mainstream media.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45172 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:20 pm to
The msm have only themselves to blame.

They created this when they decided to sell out their objectivity and credibility to become propaganda shills for the Democrat Party.

Everybody knows it now. They can never go back. They can only attempt to stifle which will fail and further their descent.

There is literally no difference between outfits like NPR and banana republic state media.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

It's a righteous bubble, and may be the last hope of mankind, but we are the minority.


I understand what you mean, but it may not tell the whole story. The people on political blogs, message boards etc, are some of the most dedicated to the information, that doesn't account for the masses who stand for the principles, but are mostly unnoticed.
Posted by AZTarheeel
Member since Feb 2015
3702 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

We are going to learn that the new 'fact checking' industry is going to be as big a bunch of fraudulent propagandist as the the so called fake news that they are trying to correct.


Only low information people believe Snopes and Politifact. I am pretty sure they are 2 of the 4 organizations that will be on the "Fake News Police" force.

The left is like that sad drunk guy at the blackjack table who keeps losing and taking more cash out of the atm and losing and repeat.
Posted by tennvol
Member since Nov 2014
2495 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:02 pm to
Get ready, it will get worse.
Posted by BradPitt
Where the wild things are
Member since Nov 2009
13389 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

Get ready, it will get worse.


This. The next four years is going to be a bloodbath.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:09 pm to
They are all in.
Posted by wmr
North of Dickson, South of Herman's
Member since Mar 2009
32518 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:15 pm to
Western Civilization has a disease.

Look around Marxist circles and you'll figure it out.

We need chemotherapy.
Posted by Chuker
St George, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2015
7544 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

complete fabrication and is unrelated to later claims that Donna Brazile might have provided the Clinton campaign previews of questions to be asked at much earlier Democratic primary (i.e., non-presidential) events.




Unless I'm mistaken, this is actually correct. I was under the impression that Donna leaked questions to Hill for her debate with Bernie.

I've never heard anything about Donna leaking Hillary questions for the Presidential debate against Trump.

Correct me If I'm wrong...
Posted by Stingray
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
12420 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:20 pm to
Ain't no MIGHT about it. She did leak.
This post was edited on 12/16/16 at 8:21 pm
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32095 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

The above-quoted story is a piece of fake news from a relatively new fake news site


Unbelievable levels of bullshite.
Posted by Chuker
St George, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2015
7544 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

She did leak.



But did she leak questions against Bernie or Tump? Or both?
This post was edited on 12/16/16 at 8:42 pm
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
31634 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:56 pm to
I believe this article was from before Wikileaks, and I think it was later updated. I think it's talking about a story written before we found out the actual fact about brazille.
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
19936 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

Unless I'm mistaken, this is actually correct. I was under the impression that Donna leaked questions to Hill for her debate with Bernie.


At best, a distinction without a difference. The last part of the text is the WTF phrase. Are primaries for the presidential nomination "non-presidential"?
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
31634 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 9:06 pm to
You pinpointed what I think is the updated part of the article.

My hypothesis was correct.
This post was edited on 12/16/16 at 9:07 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram