- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The justification for owning tatical weaponry
Posted on 2/25/18 at 10:14 am to BACONisMEATcandy
Posted on 2/25/18 at 10:14 am to BACONisMEATcandy
I’ve thought about buying an AR-50.
Probably the only reason I haven’t is the same reason I don’t own a Desert Eagle .50
Ammo would cost WAY too much. Can’t have a good time when every trigger pull costs you $4.
Probably the only reason I haven’t is the same reason I don’t own a Desert Eagle .50
Ammo would cost WAY too much. Can’t have a good time when every trigger pull costs you $4.
1
Posted on 2/25/18 at 10:35 am to SabiDojo
quote:
NO ONE should be able to own a fully semiautomatic weapon of war!
Please explain to us the difference between a semiautomatic weapon of war and a fully semiautomatic weapon of war.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 10:41 am to rebeloke
If I owned weapons like this, they would never be used to murder innocent people.
I think sane, taxpaying people should have the freedom to own any gun they want to. Mentally disturbed people should not have to be able to purchase guns.
I think sane, taxpaying people should have the freedom to own any gun they want to. Mentally disturbed people should not have to be able to purchase guns.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 11:06 am to bamafan1001
quote:
Mentally disturbed people should not have to be able to purchase guns.
There are many on this board that would consider being a registered Democrat as a “mental disturbance.”
Posted on 2/25/18 at 11:12 am to BamaChemE
We need to ban whatever this is. It looks dangerous........ly stupid.
Probably a registered Democrat in Broward County.
Probably a registered Democrat in Broward County.
This post was edited on 2/25/18 at 11:13 am
Posted on 2/25/18 at 11:13 am to rebeloke
quote:
All military grade weapons are up for discussion.
So based off of the typical Liberal this weapon would be up to be banned....
Posted on 2/25/18 at 11:14 am to rebeloke
quote:
military grade
quote:
tatical
so, all of these:
Posted on 2/25/18 at 11:17 am to Dawgfanman
quote:
Military grade is meaningless tripe
Apparently, liberals now want to ban Ford trucks!
Posted on 2/25/18 at 11:49 am to TrueTiger
Being a smart arsse is really cute. I bet you are a lady killer.
Seriously, how hard is it to imagine the legitimacy of using military weapons?
Tanks on the extreme end, rocket launchers, explosives, body amor, assault weapons, etc.
You guys are a bunch of lilliputians.
Seriously, how hard is it to imagine the legitimacy of using military weapons?
Tanks on the extreme end, rocket launchers, explosives, body amor, assault weapons, etc.
You guys are a bunch of lilliputians.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 12:06 pm to Kriegschwein
I've looked at the AR-15 .50 cal uppers. There is so much to choose from 
But none of that is "Military Grade"
But none of that is "Military Grade"
Posted on 2/25/18 at 12:07 pm to rebeloke
Don't get all buthurt about it.
Look, the main difference in "military' market tools and civilian market tools is that the military versions are beefed up to take more abuse. Other than that, they do the same thing.
A deer rifle will kill you just as dead as a battle rifle, it just won't last as long.
Look, the main difference in "military' market tools and civilian market tools is that the military versions are beefed up to take more abuse. Other than that, they do the same thing.
A deer rifle will kill you just as dead as a battle rifle, it just won't last as long.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 12:09 pm to SabiDojo
No one should be allowed to own a car. They kill over 40k Americnas each year because they are miss used by the operator......
Posted on 2/25/18 at 12:11 pm to rebeloke
quote:Again, like this?
Seriously, how hard is it to imagine the legitimacy of using military weapons?
Posted on 2/25/18 at 12:12 pm to rebeloke
Does painting something black make it tactical? If so, I'm looking at getting a new tactical truck and new tactical dress shoes.
This post was edited on 2/25/18 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 2/25/18 at 12:14 pm to rebeloke
Posted on 2/25/18 at 12:14 pm to TrueTiger
I’m not butt hurt at all. I think your obfuscation if the issue isn’t helpful. There is no moral equivalence of a tank or rocket launcher. So try and use a good example instead of a straw horse.
I can see a justification for owning just about anything. The point is where do you draw the line?
I can see a justification for owning just about anything. The point is where do you draw the line?
Posted on 2/25/18 at 12:24 pm to rebeloke
quote:You first. What your justification for free speech?
The justification for owning tatical weaponry
Why is it only the 2A needs “justification”? Silly.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 12:31 pm to BACONisMEATcandy
I was talking about one of these
Posted on 2/25/18 at 1:22 pm to SabiDojo
quote:
NO ONE should be able to own a fully semiautomatic weapon of war! If you do you are LITERALLY responsible for MURDER
You have no clue what you are talking about so i guess you are LITERALLY ignorant.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 1:23 pm to rebeloke
quote:How does something become a military grade weapon? Is it look or functionality? How about lethality, does that count as well?
military grade weapons
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News