
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The irony of this Cornell chick and “Epstein victims”
Posted on 10/2/26 at 2:29 pm to BoarEd
Posted on 10/2/26 at 2:29 pm to BoarEd
quote:Sorry, your user names fricked me up.
That's exactly what it was. Silver or lead. Either take the money, enjoy the perks of being a victim, or end up being hit by a frickin bus like Giuffre.
I'm not sure what you mean about "political fanboy" in this context, but what I spoke to is the very obvious reality of the frickin situation.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 2:29 pm to DeBoar
Neither one of you know what the frick you're talking about. He thought he was responding to you, and you're agreeing with him and therefore discrediting yourself.
Furthermore, I told you that this is inexorably linked to politics and it's not possible to separate the two.
Just how fricking stupid are you, anyways?
quote:
Yet he claims it isn’t politicalized.
Furthermore, I told you that this is inexorably linked to politics and it's not possible to separate the two.
Just how fricking stupid are you, anyways?
Posted on 10/2/26 at 2:31 pm to BoarEd
quote:Right which means I agree with you and you say I don't know what I'm talking about?
Neither one of you know what the frick you're talking about. He thought he was responding to you
eta- something needs to be done about these user names
This post was edited on 10/2/26 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 10/2/26 at 2:34 pm to DeBoar
Debora’s hard drive would make Bill Cosby squeamish
Posted on 10/2/26 at 2:56 pm to Jorts R Us
Y’all have to overemphasize and play up the tiniest of “wins,” and they aren’t even “wins” at all. Had anyone mentioned to y’all that not saying anything is always a legitimate option?
Posted on 10/2/26 at 2:59 pm to davyjones
You mean roadgators alter he speaks to in Spanish on here has to come into a thread to laugh and validate his post? Totally normal behavior
Posted on 10/2/26 at 2:59 pm to Jorts R Us
We got a win. Sweet.
Cerveza ahora
Celebracion
Cerveza ahora
Celebracion
Posted on 10/2/26 at 2:59 pm to DeBoar
I’d be an idiot to doubt that scenario.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:02 pm to DeBoar
I see that now. Their side is 99% of the time on the offensive. Yet none of them can even tell us what their objective is that’s serious enough to warrant all this “same-side opposition and shite talking” that WILL be a benefit to Democrats on election day.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:05 pm to DeBoar
Still a liar, I see. An icky one at that. Bad form, Jeffrey.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:05 pm to davyjones
Maybe I’m crazy but wasn’t it you that brought the team us vs them to the conversation?
No? Lol
No? Lol
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:09 pm to davyjones
quote:
Y’all have to overemphasize and play up the tiniest of “wins,” and they aren’t even “wins” at all. Had anyone mentioned to y’all that not saying anything is always a legitimate option?
What are you on about? I'm laughing at his lack of self-awareness. I'm not interested in your message board wars.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:12 pm to roadGator
It’s a way to directly and straightforwardly describe/explain a point that is not centered around the topic of one team versus another. But that you took that and that alone from my remarks is typical, identify a simplistic trope within a more complex topic or point, and render the conversation down to just that. Well, you’re not very discrete in that regard and furthermore it’s a pitiful trope anyway.
If you’re that determined to achieve a win, from your perspective, we can just stipulate that any future exchanges between you and me would result in a win for you. Would that possibly free you from the chains of desperation?
If you’re that determined to achieve a win, from your perspective, we can just stipulate that any future exchanges between you and me would result in a win for you. Would that possibly free you from the chains of desperation?
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:14 pm to davyjones
So it wasn’t you?
Ok. Was it you that brought up wins and not me?
I’m probably the crazy one.
Ok. Was it you that brought up wins and not me?
I’m probably the crazy one.
This post was edited on 10/2/26 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:16 pm to roadGator
You read through that? I lost interest two words in.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:18 pm to Jorts R Us
Lack of self awareness is a humorous matter to start with? That’s my point. You’re forcing a laugh at something that doesn’t even qualify for laughter.
It’s like, let’s say laughing at someone who you don’t like for being audited for something he either did or didn’t do. You’re getting your emotions mixed up. You may be extremely satisfied by the situation, but finding it hilarious is among other things quite bizarre.
It’s like, let’s say laughing at someone who you don’t like for being audited for something he either did or didn’t do. You’re getting your emotions mixed up. You may be extremely satisfied by the situation, but finding it hilarious is among other things quite bizarre.

Popular
Back to top



0





