Started By
Message

re: The irony of this Cornell chick and “Epstein victims”

Posted on 10/2/26 at 10:58 am to
Posted by DeBoar
Member since Jan 2024
5919 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 10:58 am to
Please show us information that they were bagged and dragged to the island. Please show us when it wasn’t politicalized? Even Massie and Ro didn’t tweet about Epstein until the last two years. That sir is being called politically motivated
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
6019 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 10:59 am to
Children can't consent to sexual activity adults can. If you think this is hypocrisy you're a retard or a pedo
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
29022 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Defending Jeffrey Epstein to own the libruls is quite the amazing development


The 180s on policy have been bizarre but not that surprising. Watching people do a 180 on Jeffrey Freaking Epstein because Trump told them to is next level purple kool-aid shite.
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
42797 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:06 am to
quote:

The 180s on policy have been bizarre but not that surprising. Watching people do a 180 on Jeffrey Freaking Epstein because Trump told them to is next level purple kool-aid shite.


It’s truly amazing. Total and complete obedience.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44345 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:14 am to
quote:

One is a recognized hoe on this board, rightfully so, and the others are “victims”, because it’s political.


This thread is frickin whack and reads exactly like something written by FLTech.
Posted by GoblinGuide
Member since Nov 2017
2402 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:18 am to
quote:

One is a recognized hoe on this board, rightfully so, and the others are “victims”, because it’s political.


I apologize, I thought you were just a moron. I didn't know you were trolling, because even a moron wouldn't have this take.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
17381 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:18 am to
quote:


So you think the Epstein girls aren’t victims?


You do realize most of the "victims" that have come forward after his initial arrest in 2005 for diddling underage girls in Palm Beach, were legally of-age and fully knew they were going to Epstien island or wherever with him to bang old rich dudes, right? Like straight up whores... who also recruited their friends to be young whores too. If you want to label them as "victims," fine. I don't consider adult wormen who knew what they were getting into, knew they were being whores, and recruited other girls to do it too, to be "victims." Sorry. Nerd.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
17381 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:18 am to
quote:


Seriously this thread is unfrickingreal


Seriously... You're a bitch.
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
42797 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:19 am to
quote:

BTROleMisser


Add this guy to a watch list
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44345 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:21 am to
You do realize that the DoJ said in 2025 that Epstein exploited as many as two hundred and fifty underage girls, right?

What the frick is wrong with you people?



They're currently investigating the guy's frickin ranch in New Mexico because it is believed he MURDERED CHILDREN AND BURIED THEM THERE.
This post was edited on 10/2/26 at 11:25 am
Posted by DeBoar
Member since Jan 2024
5919 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:29 am to
most states are 16 for consent. Not defending it but this is often missed and also used to play a narrative when “underage” is used. Most of the girls were underage and recruited other underage women, nobody is denying that. It’s also why most of this case is fricked because Epstein and Maxwell knew that. Just like regardless of consent it doesn’t matter because other laws were broken by trafficking, this also doesn’t mean that the girls didn’t willingly participate.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
17381 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:32 am to
Oh Noz... the Epstein bros are melting because of that fact that not all Epstien's stated "victims" were actually victims. Being an adult woman who knowingly travels to Epstein Island or wherever, to knowingly ummm... "entertain"... a bunch of rich older dudes (which they knew included sex), being lavished in luxury for several days at a time, and compensated handsomely for their time, doesn't make them "victims." It makes them literal whores.

Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44345 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:33 am to
quote:

nobody is denying that.


Yes, they are in fact denying that.

quote:

Just like regardless of consent it doesn’t matter because other laws were broken by trafficking, this also doesn’t mean that the girls didn’t willingly participate.


Some of them were as young as 14. His estate is being investigated because it is believed he murdered and buried children at his ranch in New Mexico. By his own admission he was trying to build a fricking baby farm at his ranch in New Mexico.

This thread is disgusting and despicable.

These matters are under open investigation by the State of New Mexico and the House Oversight Committee.

Stop trying to minimize it.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
17381 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:33 am to
quote:


Children can't consent to sexual activity adults can. If you think this is hypocrisy you're a retard or a pedo


So, with this statement, you're alleging that all Epstein's confirmed "victims" were children? You may want to do some research before talking bullshite.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44345 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:34 am to
You're a frickin piece of shite.
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
14700 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:34 am to
quote:

So you think the Epstein girls aren’t victims? What the frick is wrong with you?


It’s hard to know. It seems like almost none of them are willing to name their alleged abusers or say what happened. Hmmm.
Posted by DeBoar
Member since Jan 2024
5919 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:35 am to
Correct. Until there is evidence showing otherwise they were willing to participate, even further proof shows in the settlements. Now I will say boar has a point that zorro ranch may end up turning new evidence but at this point talking about the island we have no such evidence. And before someone says we don’t have the files, every congressional member has had full unredacted access to every file the DOJ has regardless of release or not.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
17381 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:35 am to
quote:


quote:
BTROleMisser


Add this guy to a watch list


Add your mother to the whore list.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44345 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:36 am to
When one of the known abusers is the frickin Prince of Wales it becomes a little more understandable why people might not want to name names. Again, people have apparently been murdered over this.
Posted by DeBoar
Member since Jan 2024
5919 posts
Posted on 10/2/26 at 11:37 am to
Prince of whales did participate nobody is denying that. Guess what he was named and nobody died.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram