3
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The irony of this Cornell chick and “Epstein victims”
Posted on 10/2/26 at 12:40 pm to The Baker
Posted on 10/2/26 at 12:40 pm to The Baker
quote:
You’re certainly something. I hope this board gets rid of you eventually
Yeah because you and others can’t handle discourse on a message board or people who support someone you don’t like.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 12:40 pm to DeBoar
quote:
Yeah because you and others can’t handle discourse on a message board or people who support someone you don’t like.
You’re not just some dude with opinions.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 12:41 pm to DeBoar
quote:
Yeah because you and others can’t handle discourse on a message board or people who support someone you don’t like.
Wild coming from you. You insult literally every one that has a different opinion than you.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 12:41 pm to The Baker
Oh yeah I’m such a paid boogeyman.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 12:41 pm to DeBoar
quote:
Yeah because you and others can’t handle discourse on a message board or people who support someone you don’t like.
Hole
E
Chit
Posted on 10/2/26 at 12:42 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Yes, I am sure about that.
Can you explain for the class: (1) who is the Prince of Wales currently, and (2) who the Prince of Wales was during the events in question?
Posted on 10/2/26 at 12:42 pm to DeBoar
quote:
Oh yeah I’m such a paid boogeyman.
You suck at it though… just fyi
Posted on 10/2/26 at 12:42 pm to The Baker
Yet I live free in your head and you want me gone 
Posted on 10/2/26 at 12:43 pm to The Baker
Did you say he was paid or a “boogeyman”?
Weird.
Weird.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 12:44 pm to DeBoar
quote:
Yet I live free in your head
Lolololol
Posted on 10/2/26 at 12:45 pm to roadGator
Hes paid
But i wouldnt use the word boogeyman. More like a propagandist
But i wouldnt use the word boogeyman. More like a propagandist
Posted on 10/2/26 at 12:45 pm to SloaneRanger
Ah, I see my mistake there. 
That wasn't his official title. My bad. But the point stands as you obviously know who I was talking about. Prince of Wales or Duke of York, either way, the dude was/is still perhaps, powerful enough to have people murdered. Which he demonstrated.
That wasn't his official title. My bad. But the point stands as you obviously know who I was talking about. Prince of Wales or Duke of York, either way, the dude was/is still perhaps, powerful enough to have people murdered. Which he demonstrated.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 12:46 pm to DeBoar
quote:Everyone knows you're always looking for freebies
Yet I live free in your head
Posted on 10/2/26 at 12:47 pm to The Baker
quote:
Hes paid But i wouldnt use the word boogeyman. More like a propagandist
You would think if a side is paying someone to spread propaganda, they would be at least likable and welcoming to their side to try to recruit.
The way he shite posts and insults people that think differently
makes me not want to be on his side.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 1:04 pm to dgnx6
quote:
He can't define pedophile. Never has been able to
A pedophile is someone sexually attracted to prepubescent children.
Were any of the victims prepubescent? If not, then there was no pedophilia involved. That would then be Ephebophilia.
BYW - this thread has been gold
This post was edited on 10/2/26 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 10/2/26 at 1:15 pm to UtahCajun
That's the thing. I don't know. No one has come forward
Instead, folks like BoarEd want us to believe in an official narrative from the DOJ. Weird.
And all of these posters probably cheer on highschool dudes sleeping with their teacher.
During the Weinstein stuff Charlize Theron did an interview where she claimed an active director tried to SA her. But she wouldn't name the director. So unless these people come forward, what are we supposed to do?
Instead, folks like BoarEd want us to believe in an official narrative from the DOJ. Weird.
And all of these posters probably cheer on highschool dudes sleeping with their teacher.
During the Weinstein stuff Charlize Theron did an interview where she claimed an active director tried to SA her. But she wouldn't name the director. So unless these people come forward, what are we supposed to do?
This post was edited on 10/2/26 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 10/2/26 at 1:28 pm to dgnx6
quote:
So unless these people come forward, what are we supposed to do?
Argue our arse off on the internet?
The Epstien stuff is a blackhole. BoarEd and Deboar both have legitimate points. But after reading as much of the files as I care to, much of it is trash. Basically people claiming stuff that was never substantiated and much of it is smokescreens laid by Epstien himself to keep anyone from being able to filter the BS from the truth.
This topic is a whole DOA topic.
This post was edited on 10/2/26 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 10/2/26 at 1:31 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Instead, folks like BoarEd want us to believe in an official narrative from the DOJ. Weird.
Considering the fact that none of this would have happened at all (Epstein being arrested and "killing himself" in prison, investigations, etc) if not for Trump, I don't see reason to believe that Trump's DoJ isn't in fact working to fix this. As I said, we just found out the other day that the feds are now investigating the executors of his estate. This is more shite that would not be happening if Trump were not in office. And this isn't speculation either. This is backed up in cold hard fact considering the previous administration had all of this at their fingertips and did exactly nothing with it.
Is the DoJ being completely forthright with everything? No, they're not. But I also believe this is for good reason and it's a reason that has been explicitly stated by this DoJ.
Look, I have been on this particular topic for years now. Since everyone was saying I was a crazy conspiracy theorist for even bringing it up. This very thread shows that I don't just listen to what Trump says on these matters. I'm not going around calling it a hoax. It is a very serious matter. And I do believe the DoJ is working to resolve it.
I think the biggest problem in all of this is that there is shite in this case that is bigger than the sex abuse shite. Matters of national security.
This post was edited on 10/2/26 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 10/2/26 at 1:34 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Is the DoJ being completely forthright with everything? No, they're not. But I also believe this is for good reason and it's a reason that has been explicitly stated by this DoJ
They cannot be 100% transparent. To do so would poison any investigation.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 1:35 pm to UtahCajun
Right.
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News