- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/3/22 at 3:59 pm to SleepyJoe
quote:
I wouldn't be so sure about that. They'll likely pass something with 10 round mag limit and go from 18 to 21 years old on certain arms. This is as close as they've ever been to breaking the back of the 2nd. And they will take advantage of it. When the 10 round mag limit doesn't change anything and even more people are being shot and killed they will drop it to a 3 round limit, and so on. Don't think for a second that Republicans in DC want to protect the second amendment. They want it gone too
Nothing like that will pass. Logistically, how are they going to “buy back” and collect hundred of millions of these magazines? Raising the age limit from 18 to 21 has already been proven unconstitutional on both the east and west coast.
They will not get 10 republicans and Manchin and Sinema to vote for anything like that. Remember, it’s the midterms.
Look for red flag law expansion and yellow flag laws. Yellow flag laws are where law enforcement can say you’re unfit to have your guns and take them.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 5:12 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
Capacity of all guns limited to 10 rounds.
Oooof that's gonna sting.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 5:28 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:This is familyphobic. What if I identify as a family member of someone else?
(37)The term family members means spouses, domestic partners, parents and their children, including step-parents and their step-children, siblings, aunts or uncles and their nieces or nephews, or grandparents and their grandchildren.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 5:41 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
What about .22 rifles with 14 round tubular magazines?
No one needs a high velocity round like that. You can take limbs off with that weapon of war.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 5:43 pm to fallguy_1978
quote:
Guess I'll be a felon.
There a few hills worth dying on and this is one of them imo
Yep. They can fricking bring it.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 7:41 pm to jbgleason
quote:
OP is incorrect. It doesn't say this at all. quote: Capacity of all guns limited to 10 rounds
No, I’m correct. From the bill:
Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
(42)The term large capacity ammunition feeding device—
(A)means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, helical feeding device, or similar device, including any such device joined or coupled with another in any manner, that has an overall capacity of, or that can be readily restored, changed, or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition.
Now, this would apply only to new movement and possession of guns but I’ve already stated such earlier in the thread. I’ve also stated that I believe this is just the first step. I fully expect the government to come for those large capacity (10+) guns already in possession in future gun control measures.
Have a good evening.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:27 pm to Sundance
quote:
1. Enforce all laws!
2. Arrest Criminals!
3. Prosecute Criminals!
![]()
Allelujah! What is so hard about these 3 easy steps!
Posted on 6/4/22 at 3:42 pm to Placekicker
quote:The most dangerous words in the world "It can't happen here".
Nothing like this will pass the Senate. It’s too radical.
Popular
Back to top

1








