- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The definitive video showing Good's vehicle striking the agent
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:19 pm to TX Tiger
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:19 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
If you can't answer the questions, just say you can't answer the questions. It doesn't make you look that bad.
Your questions are irrelevant. If I ask you why are there lizard people…would you entertain that irrelevant idiocy with a response?
1
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:20 pm to Jbird
quote:
Shoot the tires is almost as good as Roger and his 15% unrealized loss was forever.
and it was 6k. Where is he? I hope he is ok. Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:20 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Please do.
You strike me as a compulsive liar. You're really good at it.
Projection, my friend. I have the receipts. You want me to post them?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:21 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
I agree. But when they apply to citizens and not law enforcement, there's a problem.
What law of the United States did the officer violate?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:21 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
I’m just pointing out what will likely be brought up in legal proceedings.
Wrong. What you “point out” is completely irrelevant to the legal proceedings.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:22 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Sure, I have nothing to hide. Why are there lizard people? I haven't a clue. I wasn't aware there were.
If you can't answer the questions, just say you can't answer the questions. It doesn't make you look that bad.
Your questions are irrelevant. If I ask you why are there lizard people…would you entertain that irrelevant idiocy with a response?
See how easy that is.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:23 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Please do.
Here you go. Here is what you said. Do you deny it?
quote:
I think more appropriate response might have been to shoot the tires out.
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 4:24 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:24 pm to BBONDS25
quote:It is my understanding that part of their job is to DE-ESCALATE the situation. They, in fact, ESCALATED the situation by rushing her car and trying to pull her out. The two officers complicated the situation by giving her conflicting orders. One told her to drive away while the other grabbed her door handle to yank her out.
I agree. But when they apply to citizens and not law enforcement, there's a problem.
What law of the United States did the officer violate?
They escalated the situation, rather than de-escalating the situation.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:24 pm to TX Tiger
She would have made her objective if the tires don't spin.
Period
Period
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:25 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Sure, I have nothing to hide. Why are there lizard people? I haven't a clue. I wasn't aware there were. See how easy that is.
Ok. Good. Agreed. I haven’t a clue why she did what she did. We good?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:25 pm to TX Tiger
quote:I'll play.
Yes, of these simple questions. I'll post them again.
(1) I do NOT think that she intended to hit him. I doubt that she even noticed him.
(2) I don't think that she "backed up" to avoid him. When she put the vehicle into reverse, he was not even in front of the vehicle yet, as I recall. I think that he was forward of the vehicle, but slightly to the right (from the driver's perspective), as he was circling and filming the vehicle. He moved across the front of the vehicle as it was backing-up and then as it was (briefly) stopped after doing so.
Why did she "back up?" Purely an inference on my part, but I think she was just trying to position the vehicle such that she would not cross into the oncoming traffic lane (left side, from driver's perspective) when she pulled into the right lane to drive away.
(3) Again, I don't think she planned to hit the agent, so I dont' think she was trying to "accomplish" anything.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:25 pm to BBONDS25
He might have actually drank himself to death
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:26 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Why didn't you include the entire quote? Why didn't you include the context to that quote?
Here you go. Here is what you said. Do you deny it?
quote:
I think more appropriate response might have been to shoot the tires out.
You are a very disingenuous person. You should feel bad. But then again, you'd have to have a conscience in order to do that.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:27 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
It is my understanding that part of their job is to DE-ESCALATE the situation. They, in fact, ESCALATED the situation by rushing her car and trying to pull her out. The two officers complicated the situation by giving her conflicting orders. One told her to drive away while the other grabbed her door handle to yank her out.
That’s non-responsive to my question. You’re big on people answering your questions right? I will restate mine:
quote:
What law of the United States did the officer violate?
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 4:28 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:29 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
I do NOT think that she intended to hit him. I doubt that she even noticed him.
Ridiculous
She’s looking right at him, even while backing up she’s looking right at him. She puts it in gear and accelerates towards him all while looking right at him.
Only after hitting him does the car begin to turn.
If you want to say she didn’t intent to kill him then you would probably be right but we’ll never know.
Ridiculous
She’s looking right at him, even while backing up she’s looking right at him. She puts it in gear and accelerates towards him all while looking right at him.
Only after hitting him does the car begin to turn.
If you want to say she didn’t intent to kill him then you would probably be right but we’ll never know.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:30 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Sound analysis. 
Not sure why the other posters spent so much time and energy avoiding these simple questions.
Not sure why the other posters spent so much time and energy avoiding these simple questions.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:30 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Why didn't you include the entire quote? Why didn't you include the context to that quote?
You provide the context that would change the effect of what you said. Use the exact quotes. You can’t use the “context” defense for a statement you continually deny you made. If you can, prove it. You won’t
quote:
You are a very disingenuous person. You should feel bad
Prove it. I showed my receipts. Show yours. You won’t. And your failure to do so will prove me correct.
By the way. I don’t think you’re a bad person. You’re just not a very smart person.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:31 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Not sure why the other posters spent so much time and energy avoiding these simple questions
Relevance is why. No need to engage in issues that don’t matter.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:36 pm to BBONDS25
We need another 25 pages of arguing over a dead terrorist.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:40 pm to Robin Masters
quote:I think you are mistaken, though his video does not show where she is looking at all times.
She’s looking right at him, even while backing up she’s looking right at him. She puts it in gear and accelerates towards him all while looking right at him.
When that video first shows her through the windshield, she is looking out the driver-side window. We then see her turning both her head and the steering wheel to her right (camera left). We never see her look back in the direction of the agent, as I recall.
Yes, her eyes would have crossed the agent for a fraction of a second. Yes, someone produced a vidcap of the fraction of a second that she was looking straight forward.
But (again) I just dont' think she was paying attention and just did not register that he was there, because she was focused on the guy attempting to reach into the cab and then upon preparing to drive away. Franklly, if she saw him (and it registered) I think that her head would have STOPPED moving to her right.
You can certainly interpret the video differently.
Cheers.
Page 25 of 35
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News