Started By
Message

re: The Crusades were justified

Posted on 2/4/24 at 4:50 pm to
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
17959 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

Then maybe theism isn't the common denominator.

Itn a thread about religious wars it is. Finding an outlier doesn’t mean there isn’t commonality in general.
This post was edited on 2/4/24 at 4:56 pm
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28043 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Itn a thread about religious wars it is.


Only if you narrowly define religion.

quote:

Finding an outlier doesn’t mean there isn’t commonality in general.

Is it an outlier? You think wars based on religion are the rule and those based on geography, other tribal ties or political ideology are all outliers?
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
17959 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

Only if you narrowly define religion.

If you say so man. If you want to believe the crusades weren’t religious then go for it. I don’t really care.
quote:

Is it an outlier? You think wars based on religion are the rule and those based on geography, other tribal ties or political ideology are all outliers?

I think you’re confusing me with someone else or believe I’m saying something about all wars being religious. I am not. This thread is specifically about the Crusades. You’re the one who went for Cambodia for some unknown reason.
This post was edited on 2/4/24 at 5:08 pm
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

The Crusades were justified

Which Crusades, the Children's Crusade? The Northern Crusade?
quote:

Prior to this, the Middle East and Northern Africa had a majority 'Christian' population.


The 'Christianity' of the 11th-13th centuries was not the Christianity of today. Hardly even comparable at all.
Posted by DerkaDerka
Member since Jul 2016
1315 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 5:09 pm to
Not to mention the battlefront moved from within Europe to the East. Commerce within Europe thrived again and the Middle Ages ended soon after.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
35466 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

God isn't real.


Irrelevant to a historical discussion of actual facts.

Go stalk some white sorority girls.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28043 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

If you want to believe the crusades weren’t religious then go for it.



Never said that, never even insinuated that.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76341 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 5:37 pm to
They were about a lot of things. Money being high on the list. Saving the Byzantine Emperors arse. The Pope taking over the religious leadership in the east. Reclaiming the shrines in Jerusalem cause needing someone else's permission means no money in someone's coffers.
Posted by Tigerinthewoods
In the woods
Member since Oct 2009
1747 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 5:52 pm to
quote:


Love and Beauty exist for some...others not so much. The death of a Believer and a Non-Believer re God would be the same physical process for both, as perceived by Worldly (non-Spiritual) viewers. Yet for the Believer, losing the bonds and limitations of perception and self and 'expanding' into the Self-Aware Energy Reservoir (God) would be the ultimate form of liberation, exhilaration and exploration. Not to mention Love. But only from the POV of the 'dying' Perceiver; Belief/Faith being key via the "perception is reality" narrative. While the same experience from a Non-Believer's POV would simply be a loss of consciousness by degree, and absorption into a feelingless Energy Reservoir. One would be a wonderful feeling and experience, the other not so much.


I prefer to approach the whole concept of death less philosophically and scientifically and more spiritually. When we die our physical body returns to the elements of which it is composed ("dust to dust"). If there is a spiritual compontent of our humanity beyond our temporal body (I believe there is), it continues on to a spiritual realm. I believe that realm is the presence of God. Whether our spirit remains in the presence of God or not depends on if our hope and faith are in Him or not.

On this earth, my hope and faith are in a very personal and loving God, the God of Christianity whose Son was Jesus Christ. I believe that God sent His Son to become a man and experience all the trials and tribulations of humanity. Jesus experienced all that we experience, including temptation, but was without sin. As a perfect and guiltless man, he was able to pay the consequences of sin (eternal separation from God) for all sinners for all time. It is not possible to earn forgiveness from God through Jesus. Nothing we could ever say or do is worth that much. It can only be received as a gift (the greatest gift of all) from a loving Father.

To say there is no God is to say there is no forgiveness or even a need for forgiveness. Thus, there is no true guilt or innocence, no good or evil, no ultimate moral compass to which all of us must answer. A man may do whatever he wishes and can get away with. For me, this is the ultimate hopeless existence. I need for there to be a Loving God, a good and evil, a reason to fight for the good and vanquish the evil even if I fail again and again. I need to have hope that I am loved even when I sometimes do not deserve it.

I have noticed that people who believe there is no God are usually very cynical. They are more often than not selfish and self-centered. Their moral outlook is usually very inconsistent - what they consider good one day may be bad the next depending on how they feel. Most importantly, people who believe there is no God fall for anything because they stand for nothing.

Ultimately, all of us will die. If there is no God, no one will know the difference. Blackness will come, and then nothing...

If there is a God, I would rather approach Him having hoped in Him than having said to myself and the whole world that I never hoped in Him, trusted Him, or gave Him a chance. To say God isn't real leaves very little room for Him to prove to you that He is.

I believe this with all my heart - If you want evidence that He is real, just ask Him to reveal Himself to you. If you are willing to see Him as He truly is, He will reveal Himself to you.

Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16291 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

How many atheist martyrs can you name?


Like Audrey Elizabeth Hale?

Posted by Boodis Man
Member since Sep 2020
8368 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 6:13 pm to
the crusaders failed in their objective to secure the holy land. they also failed in saving constantinople and actually sacked it themselves. also Anatolia was lost to the turks under their watch.

they were a bunch of morons and actually tried teaming up with the mongols to defeat the muslims, but those sides eventually ended up losing to the muslins anyways.

they didn't stop the muslim invasion of europe. it was other european rulers/knights like charles martell, king louis II, etc that stopped them
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

they also failed in saving constantinople and actually sacked it themselves.


Which hastened the demise of the Byzantines.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
39565 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 7:31 pm to


See you on the path, someday, somewhere, Tw. In the beautiful woods, I hope.
Posted by Tigerinthewoods
In the woods
Member since Oct 2009
1747 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

See you on the path, someday, somewhere, Tw. In the beautiful woods, I hope.


Something tells me we will one day meet in those beautiful woods and recognize one another.
Posted by TankBoys32
Member since Mar 2019
4204 posts
Posted on 2/4/24 at 9:35 pm to
The Crusades were retaliation to the Islamic invasion of Europe
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84593 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 1:35 am to
quote:

The Crusades were justified

Which Crusades, the Children's Crusade? The Northern Crusade?

You’re the only one in this thread confused
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37424 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 5:54 am to
Why then were they attacking to the east in the Levant when the Muslims were in the west in Spain?
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28001 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 7:28 am to
quote:

Like Audrey Elizabeth Hale?


Was killed shooting up a school. That's not martyrdom.
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
20076 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 7:54 am to
State violence is never justified. As a matter of fact, Venice snitched on them to Egypt when one crusade was planned. By the end of it, crusaders were attacking other christians.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37424 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 8:03 am to
The Doge probably saw no profit in it. The Venetians and Genoa were all about the money. At the seige of Constantinople the Genoa trade settlement across the Golden Horn from Constantinople was left untouched and unmolested because they and the Venetians were doing business with Mehmet and the Ottomans
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram