Started By
Message

re: The Church did not replace Israel in prophecy

Posted on 10/8/25 at 3:51 pm to
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
46687 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Nationally, racially, and spiritually, the nation of Israel exists. God has preserved them supernaturally according to His will.

Whether you want to agree with everything they do or not is up to you, but I will always support their right to exist and defend themselves.


So the answer to my question is that the State of Israel replace Israel
Posted by BrookhavenBengal
Brookhaven, MS
Member since Oct 2007
3577 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 3:52 pm to
What if...hear me out...God's covenant with Israel has nothing to do with the STATE of Israel?
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
43434 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 3:53 pm to
Posted by extremetigerfanatic
Member since Oct 2003
5851 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 3:54 pm to
Paul says otherwise. You should actually read your Bible through.

Try the ESV.

Dont read a Schofield Bible.

By the way. You should actually study what convenant theology is. Your lumping with replacement theology is telling and shows you don’t know.


And I don’t know any church that teaches replacement. It’s not a theology that’s taught. It’s a word dispensationalists use to fight off criticism.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 3:58 pm
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
40594 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Christ is the New Covenant


Correct. I should have said my deal with Christ.
Posted by Goombaw
Kentucky
Member since Jan 2013
6238 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

Another know-nothing dispensationalist.

Another sadly ignorant reformist. Many of the reform theology writers simply believed that way because they saw no nation of Israel and no possibility of one. The idea of was so implausible that it caused them to look to other ideas of interpreting the Bible. Those people would’ve been stunned to see today that there exists a nation of Israel. They would also likely rejoice.
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
43434 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

Paul says otherwise


He should learn it from a man of, correct me if I’m wrong, of Jewish faith.
Posted by Schleynole
Member since Sep 2022
1473 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 3:55 pm to
Keep studying the Bible, that's all you can do
Posted by Randman
Mississippi
Member since Feb 2018
357 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 3:56 pm to
“I want you to understand this mystery, dear brothers and sisters, so that you will not feel proud about yourselves. Some of the people of Israel have hard hearts, but this will last only until the full number of Gentiles comes to Christ. And so all Israel will be saved. As the Scriptures say, “The one who rescues will come from Jerusalem, and he will turn Israel away from ungodliness. And this is my covenant with them, that I will take away their sins.”

Many of the people of Israel are now enemies of the Good News, and this benefits you Gentiles. Yet they are still the people he loves because he chose their ancestors Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. For God’s gifts and his call can never be withdrawn.

Once, you Gentiles were rebels against God, but when the people of Israel rebelled against him, God was merciful to you instead. Now they are the rebels, and God’s mercy has come to you so that they, too, will share in God’s mercy. For God has imprisoned everyone in disobedience so he could have mercy on everyone.”

Romans 11:25-32
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 4:35 pm
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
43434 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

The idea of was so implausible that it caused them to look to other ideas of interpreting the Bible


Again, I’m asking you which Jews of the world are saved? Those that believed Jesus was the messiah or those that don’t? Or all of them?

ETA Randman beat me to it.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 3:57 pm
Posted by DellTronJon
Member since Feb 2010
1633 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 3:57 pm to
Israel is defined literally and figuratively as 'the people who struggle with God.' The state of Isreael has turned their back on God.
Posted by Goombaw
Kentucky
Member since Jan 2013
6238 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 3:58 pm to
I like the KJV, I believe it’s God’s word for English speaking people. And I have read it and studied it.

I’ll edit my comment since you edited yours. Covenant theology is replacement theology without saying it. There are three groups of people on the earth: Jews, Gentiles, and the Church. Race doesn’t matter, citizenship doesn’t matter, you’re in one of those groups. I’m part of the church and happy to be. It’s Christ’s masterpiece. But that doesn’t throw away the Jews.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 4:05 pm
Posted by geauxjuice
t(-.-t)
Member since Jan 2007
4343 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 3:59 pm to
we really gonna let the world get nuked because yall got bad reading comprehension?

the new israel is within
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 4:01 pm
Posted by BuckeyeGoon
Member since Jan 2025
958 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:02 pm to
The Jews/Hebrews from the old testament became Christians. Christians worshiping the Jews is a relatively new phenomenon, as Jews have subverted Christian churches in the past couple hundreds of years. The early and middle ages European Christian churches didnt have the same affinity for Jews that modern churches teach and promote.
Posted by 21blackjack
Member since Oct 2025
1099 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:02 pm to
Someone explain Revelations to me. Is it an extension of Daniel?
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
34811 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

Replacement or covenant theology is heresy.


Are you laboring under an understanding that these are synonymous?

ETA: I unfortunately read the rest of the thread. Including this:

quote:

Covenant theology is replacement theology without saying it.


Until we have a religion/ theology board i am out.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 4:07 pm
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
148462 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:05 pm to
The new covenant was instituted at the last supper and seen as the completion of God’s promise to Israel. It’s an extension of God’s promise to everyone through the blood of our Savior.
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
52944 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:06 pm to
You are wrong
Posted by extremetigerfanatic
Member since Oct 2003
5851 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

I like the KJV, I believe it’s God’s word for English speaking people. And I have read it and studied it.

It doesn’t come across that way at all.
You completely dismissed Romans 9 without giving any context.
You could explain yourself better.

Romans 9:8
But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but “Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.” This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 4:14 pm
Posted by Goombaw
Kentucky
Member since Jan 2013
6238 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 4:08 pm to
The nation of Israel, the 12 tribes, the descendants of Abraham. The denial of the state of Israel being actually Jewish is right up there with the “black Israelites” level of delusion.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram