- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The AAP hit with a federal RICO lawsuit for operating a vaccine racketeering enterprise.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 7:27 pm to BoarEd
Posted on 8/22/26 at 7:27 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Third, the decline in these numbers is not attributed to vaccines, per the CDC. Instead the decline is due to a combination of factors such as improved socioeconomic conditions, better nutrition, wider availability if prenatal care, advances in medical science, and advances in lifesaving neonatal intensive-care technology.
Amazing how specific diseases were eradicated by socioeconomic factors and neonatal care at the exact same time that the vaccines for those diseases were produced. We have a good and serendipitous God, baws.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 7:31 pm to BoarEd
quote:
I didn’t know that RICO laws could be filed by non law enforcement entities Well now ya do. Civil RICO cases are a thing.
Yep learned something new today.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 9:03 pm to BoarEd
quote:
To start with, you are citing infant mortality figures and trying to claim they are children wide. Secondly, no, 3% of births did not end in death in 1962.
No I wasn’t citing infant mortality rates, I was quoting child mortality rates which measures deaths under 5. All of the numbers I posted are 100% correct.
You’re a dipshit
quote:
frickin shills, man
You made a stupid assumption and then showed you had no idea what you were talking about
Posted on 8/22/26 at 10:11 pm to VOLhalla
I'm a dipshit?
Let's take a look at what your own source says about what drives down child mortality rates.
Pretty much in line with what I pointed out was stupid about your implied point to begin with. And the percentages cited are misleading. They're in line with infant mortality rates for the same timeframe according to CDC data which defines infant mortality rates as a death under the age of 1.
Neither source (the CDC or your site) attribute vaccines as a reason the rates fall.
Again, shills are gonna shill.
Let's take a look at what your own source says about what drives down child mortality rates.
quote:
For child mortality to reach low levels, many things have to go right at the same time: good healthcare, good nutrition, clean water and sanitation, maternal health, and high living standards. We can, therefore, think of child mortality as a proxy indicator of a country’s living conditions.
Pretty much in line with what I pointed out was stupid about your implied point to begin with. And the percentages cited are misleading. They're in line with infant mortality rates for the same timeframe according to CDC data which defines infant mortality rates as a death under the age of 1.
Neither source (the CDC or your site) attribute vaccines as a reason the rates fall.
Again, shills are gonna shill.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 2:15 am to VOLhalla
“The U.S. child mortality rate in 1962 was 2.9%,in 1983 it was 1.3% and in 2019 it was .7%
The NHTSA estimates that age-appropriate child restraints dramatically lower death risks.
Infants(under 1 year old)reduces the risk of death by 71% in passenger cars.
Toddlers(1 to 4 years old) reduces death by 54 %.
Children in booster Seats(4 to 8 years old) reduces the risk of death by 45%-59%.
I would argue that child car seat laws have saved more children’s lives than the multitude of vaccines they are subjected to.
According to the CDC drowning is a leading cause of death,particularly for toddlers ages ages 1-4.
Maybe if children’s parents watched their kids closer and had pool alarms the childhood death rate would be even lower.
The NHTSA estimates that age-appropriate child restraints dramatically lower death risks.
Infants(under 1 year old)reduces the risk of death by 71% in passenger cars.
Toddlers(1 to 4 years old) reduces death by 54 %.
Children in booster Seats(4 to 8 years old) reduces the risk of death by 45%-59%.
I would argue that child car seat laws have saved more children’s lives than the multitude of vaccines they are subjected to.
According to the CDC drowning is a leading cause of death,particularly for toddlers ages ages 1-4.
Maybe if children’s parents watched their kids closer and had pool alarms the childhood death rate would be even lower.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 4:02 am to Ailsa
quote:
Even worse, NONE of the routine childhood vaccines were licensed based on a long-term, placebo-controlled trial.
This shite is so fricking dumb
Posted on 8/23/26 at 7:55 am to BoarEd
quote:
But I was told nothing is happening and nothing ever will happen. Surely this is incorrect fake news.
I need to go back and get sick at my stomach by reading "Dr. Mary's Monkeys" again. Dr. Oschner was also President of the American Cancer Society.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 8:34 am to Ailsa
Imagine being someone who downvoted this. The compliant do love to comply.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 8:39 am to Ailsa
The problem with this graph and the implied conclusion is that America has a very ethnically diverse population. Comparing socio-economic and ethnic groups with others that a similar would produce more compelling results.
Gun control groups use similar methods to mislead.

Gun control groups use similar methods to mislead.

Posted on 8/23/26 at 11:01 am to BoarEd
quote:
I'm a dipshit?
Yeah, you’re a dipshit and I’m embarrassed for you
I (correctly) said I was listing child mortality rates and then posted the accurate child mortality rates. You then told me I was posting infant mortality rates (wrong) and then told me my numbers were incorrect (also wrong).
If you had a modicum of self-respect you’d admit you were clearly wrong, but everyone knows you won’t. You’re pathetic
quote:
Neither source (the CDC or your site) attribute vaccines as a reason the rates fall.
No shite. A drop from 2.9% to .7% is a massive reduction. Of course there are multiple factors in the drop in child mortality. Vaccines, car seats, reduction in poverty, etc all matter. If you don’t think the massive increase in available child vaccines is a significant factor in the dramatic drop in child mortality than might be among the stupidest poster on the poliboard (which is an incredible feat)
Posted on 8/24/26 at 9:12 am to Lsupimp
quote:
Imagine being someone who downvoted this. The compliant do love to comply.
Those that want to see America destroyed don't want their plans interfered with.
Popular
Back to top


0







