re: The 2020 Election will be totally rigged if Mail-In Voting is allowed to take place!

In those same states, you are encouraged to pour into the streets into sweaty, unsanitary masses and burn everything tf down over a handful of police shootings.

We’ll be fine, Priscilla

Wut? I don’t insist on anything being cancelled. Im ideology pure as a mountain stream, Karen.

quote:

---

Name calling and generic old sayings.

---

I didn’t call you a name. I described your lack of rational thought and inability to reason by using the using the adjective ignorant.

Ok because you’re so in favor of mail in ballots for everyone:

Who do you trust to count 230 million mail in ballots and make sure every signature matches the “one on file”? Where is this file and how do we distribute it to the counters? How do we ensure this massive signature database remains secure?

What’s the standard for matching the signature?

What’s the protocol for not counting a vote? How do we track what was counted and what wasn’t? Can you contest your vote not being counted?

What’s the protocol for comparing all the mail in votes to in person votes to look for duplicates?

What’s the penalty or process for dealing with duplicates?

How do you ensure the ballots that came back were actually filled out by the person it was mailed to?

Why can’t “at risk people” request an absentee ballot? Why can’t we modify absentee ballot requests process rather than design an entire new process?

quote:

---

Interesting strategy of yours to not include any substance in your post. Fascinating stuff.

---

To answer a question that is rhetorical

Absentee Ballots: the voter goes and requests the ballot in person, or thru a state approved process where his identity of verified

Mail in Ballots: randoms receive unrequested ballots addressed from a data base that isn’t accurate, and then delivery is made by an organization who has endorsed one candidate over the other. These ballots cannot be verified as accurate in any practical or timely way.

quote:

---

That is the only reason to push it.

---

You actually should be pushing mail in to encourage the over 65 group to actually vote. This is from 2016:

In election after election, older voters have tended to be more conservative: In 2016, voters over 65 voted 52% for Mr. Trump, while voters from 18 to 34 voted 53% for Hillary Clinton.

quote:

---

The same people who do it in person on election day, the way we have been doing it for years?

---

Those folks check ID’s in my parish. Having someone in a room comparing signatures on papers without the actual voter present is not the same thing.

Your response confirms that you are in fact retarded and incapable of seeing the differences in mail in voting and in person voting.

quote:

---

So the one thing we know about DJT is that basically anytime he starts to accuse a person or group of people of something, it turns out he’s definitely doing that same thing.

---

You mean like sexual assault, refusing to accept election results, Russian collusion, and Ukrainian quid pro quo?

Lol, you mf'ers even project your projection.

You want to convert absentee balloting to full mail in votes. The deadline needs to be a month before the election to allow time to count them all.

All, and I mean ALL, of your questions are already issues that have been resolved for in-person voting or absentee voting.

You’re pretending like we’d have to “design an entirely new process” but everything is in place to do this smoothly.

Punishments are already in place for people who try to vote twice. Nothing would be different here.

For just one example, see Colorado’s official guidance on verifying signatures on affidavits that accompany their mail in ballots. If you’re actually curious...
Colorado Guidance for Signature Verfication