- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The 2008 Recession
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:44 pm
Assuming you acknowledge that there was a national recession in 2008,
What would you attributed the turn around in the market from 2008 to today's market?
How was the market revived in your opinion?
What would you attributed the turn around in the market from 2008 to today's market?
How was the market revived in your opinion?
This post was edited on 11/4/17 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:45 pm to Bison
quote:
How was the market revived in your opinion?
Bailouts.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:46 pm to Bison
Because the market always recovers. Of course...this was the slowest recovery in history. So I guess we can chalk that up to stimulus if you like.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:46 pm to Bison
20B in revenue from Singapore!!!!
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:47 pm to Bison
Quantitative Easing... Free, unlimited printing of money
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:47 pm to Bison
Cash for clunkers
Solyndra
Fast and Furious
Obamacare
Solyndra
Fast and Furious
Obamacare
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:48 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
the market always recovers
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:48 pm to Bison
Trillions of dollars of printed up money to prop up the stock market for Jug Ears.
Quantitative Easing. QE1, QE2, QE3, ...
Quantitative Easing. QE1, QE2, QE3, ...
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:51 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Of course...this was the slowest recovery in history.
Of course, this recession and say, the 1982 recession, were apples and oranges in terms of the underlying causes.
This post was edited on 11/4/17 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:51 pm to Bison
Economies naturally recover
It's called the cycle
It's called the cycle
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:53 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:
course, this recession and say, the 1982 recession, were apples and oranges in terms of the underlying causes.
Not relevant to the OP or my response.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:58 pm to Bison
What do you mean, ‘assuming you acnkowledge there was a recession’? Who the hell have you ever seen not acknowledge that the great recession happened? Is that really how lowly you think of other people?
And it really wasn’t a national recession, it was a global recession.
But to get to the question you are trying to ask, bailing out the banks was largely successful in saving the financial sector. But being that it was the financial sector who caused the recession in the first place, there’s an ethical discussion to be had about whether or not they truly deserved to be saved. Ultimately we did because they unfortunately have disproportionate power over the rest of our lives (the 5 biggest banks held assets worth 43% of US GDP in 2006 - up to 56% by 2012). But after the financial sector was saved, the economy gradually improved as markets self corrected. Though as another poster mentioned, it took significantly longer to recover than any other recession of our lifetimes.
But yea, this was a piss-poor way to ask about the great recession OP
And it really wasn’t a national recession, it was a global recession.
But to get to the question you are trying to ask, bailing out the banks was largely successful in saving the financial sector. But being that it was the financial sector who caused the recession in the first place, there’s an ethical discussion to be had about whether or not they truly deserved to be saved. Ultimately we did because they unfortunately have disproportionate power over the rest of our lives (the 5 biggest banks held assets worth 43% of US GDP in 2006 - up to 56% by 2012). But after the financial sector was saved, the economy gradually improved as markets self corrected. Though as another poster mentioned, it took significantly longer to recover than any other recession of our lifetimes.
But yea, this was a piss-poor way to ask about the great recession OP
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:59 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Not relevant to the OP or my response.
You introduced recovery time into the discussion. Maybe you were implying something. Maybe you weren't. But if you make the comparison, I think it's fair to point out that the 2008 recession was a different animal.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 1:01 pm to Bison
When you do absolutely nothing recessions end. Look up some history. The normal growth rate in recovery when you do nothing is 4%.
The growth rate under Obama's recovery was 1%. The lowest in history.
The growth rate under Obama's recovery was 1%. The lowest in history.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 1:04 pm to Bison
quote:Is English your first language?
Assuming you acknowledge that were was a national recession in 2008,
What would you attributed the turn around in the market from 2008 to today's market?
Posted on 11/4/17 at 1:06 pm to Zach
Ehhh, the Great Depression might disagree with you.
Cyclical recessions tend to end given a short amount of time for markets to adjust. But structural recessions tend to need some policy intervention.
Cyclical recessions tend to end given a short amount of time for markets to adjust. But structural recessions tend to need some policy intervention.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 1:07 pm to funnystuff
quote:
Ehhh, the Great Depression might disagree with you.
Uh, the Great Depression agrees with me. They did not leave things alone. They did TONS of shite that prolonged it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News