Started By
Message
locked post

The 2008 Recession

Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:44 pm
Posted by Bison
Truth or Consequences
Member since Dec 2016
1235 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:44 pm
Assuming you acknowledge that there was a national recession in 2008,

What would you attributed the turn around in the market from 2008 to today's market?

How was the market revived in your opinion?
This post was edited on 11/4/17 at 1:36 pm
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24572 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:44 pm to
Stimulus
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

How was the market revived in your opinion?


Bailouts.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48096 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:46 pm to
Because the market always recovers. Of course...this was the slowest recovery in history. So I guess we can chalk that up to stimulus if you like.
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
14786 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:46 pm to
20B in revenue from Singapore!!!!
Posted by rhinolsu
Tyler, TX
Member since Sep 2007
765 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:47 pm to
Quantitative Easing... Free, unlimited printing of money
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
35894 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:47 pm to
Cash for clunkers
Solyndra
Fast and Furious
Obamacare
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79615 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

the market always recovers
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24724 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:48 pm to
Trillions of dollars of printed up money to prop up the stock market for Jug Ears.

Quantitative Easing. QE1, QE2, QE3, ...
Posted by 91TIGER
Lafayette
Member since Aug 2006
17682 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:48 pm to
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
14786 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Of course...this was the slowest recovery in history.


Of course, this recession and say, the 1982 recession, were apples and oranges in terms of the underlying causes.
This post was edited on 11/4/17 at 12:52 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69250 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:51 pm to
Economies naturally recover

It's called the cycle
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48096 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

course, this recession and say, the 1982 recession, were apples and oranges in terms of the underlying causes.

Not relevant to the OP or my response.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8322 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:58 pm to
What do you mean, ‘assuming you acnkowledge there was a recession’? Who the hell have you ever seen not acknowledge that the great recession happened? Is that really how lowly you think of other people?

And it really wasn’t a national recession, it was a global recession.


But to get to the question you are trying to ask, bailing out the banks was largely successful in saving the financial sector. But being that it was the financial sector who caused the recession in the first place, there’s an ethical discussion to be had about whether or not they truly deserved to be saved. Ultimately we did because they unfortunately have disproportionate power over the rest of our lives (the 5 biggest banks held assets worth 43% of US GDP in 2006 - up to 56% by 2012). But after the financial sector was saved, the economy gradually improved as markets self corrected. Though as another poster mentioned, it took significantly longer to recover than any other recession of our lifetimes.

But yea, this was a piss-poor way to ask about the great recession OP
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
14786 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Not relevant to the OP or my response.


You introduced recovery time into the discussion. Maybe you were implying something. Maybe you weren't. But if you make the comparison, I think it's fair to point out that the 2008 recession was a different animal.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112410 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 1:01 pm to
When you do absolutely nothing recessions end. Look up some history. The normal growth rate in recovery when you do nothing is 4%.
The growth rate under Obama's recovery was 1%. The lowest in history.
Posted by tiger4life69
Member since Jan 2005
374 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 1:04 pm to
Muh obama
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126960 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Assuming you acknowledge that were was a national recession in 2008,

What would you attributed the turn around in the market from 2008 to today's market?
Is English your first language?
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8322 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 1:06 pm to
Ehhh, the Great Depression might disagree with you.

Cyclical recessions tend to end given a short amount of time for markets to adjust. But structural recessions tend to need some policy intervention.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112410 posts
Posted on 11/4/17 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Ehhh, the Great Depression might disagree with you.


Uh, the Great Depression agrees with me. They did not leave things alone. They did TONS of shite that prolonged it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram