- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: That 24k to ziltch ballot drop? Don't worry, it was just a glitch in the system.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 11:49 am to scrooster
Posted on 6/8/26 at 11:49 am to scrooster
Newsome said they had contingencies in place when he responded to a question about the possibility of Republicans winning governor and LA mayor.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 11:54 am to fwtex
Don't doubt it. I suspected as much which is why I asked what kind of ground game Pratt had two weeks ago.
Now, let's be frank. Ballot harvesting has now been around for 10 years in California. It's about time we got smart out there and started doing it ourselves. There are gun owners, churches, etc where conservatives meet and we can harvest the ballots.
Now, let's be frank. Ballot harvesting has now been around for 10 years in California. It's about time we got smart out there and started doing it ourselves. There are gun owners, churches, etc where conservatives meet and we can harvest the ballots.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 11:54 am to scrooster
quote:
They say the system just “glitched” for a minute and didn’t process any ballots for Spencer Pratt but really there were ballots for Spencer, they just didn’t get processed during the “glitch”
Eurocat was defending 0 votes for Pratt. Saying not a single person would vote for Pratt because Trump told them not to use mail in ballots, lol. Even they realize this is statistically impossible to have 24K votes without 1 ballot going for Pratt, but Eurocat says it’s totally possible, lol.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 1:28 pm to scrooster
quote:
Force an audit of California.
This sequence on vote tabulation would seem to indicate computer manipulation rather than actual mail in ballot box stuffing. The first thing Pratt needs ask for is to actually see the physical ballots that add up to the numbers the computer says are there.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 1:34 pm to Sofaking2
quote:
1 ballot going for Pratt, but Eurocat says it’s totally possible, lol.
Eurocat is one of many that would pull the trigger behind your head while telling you that it isn't fascism, he's just killing you because you had it coming for wrongthink.
Their ability to lie in every thread is amazing to me. Their hubris is always a sight to behold.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 1:38 pm to scrooster
I guess Gavin wasn’t kidding when he said “we have a break glass if necessary plan.”
And he just happened to sign into effect limiting the federal government from investigating CA elections. It’s blatantly obvious at this point, but they’ll partner with the media to gaslight everyone that disagrees into being an “election denier” or enemy of democracy.
And he just happened to sign into effect limiting the federal government from investigating CA elections. It’s blatantly obvious at this point, but they’ll partner with the media to gaslight everyone that disagrees into being an “election denier” or enemy of democracy.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 1:45 pm to scrooster
quote:
Here we go, the Los Angeles Times is admitting that yes, tens of thousands of mail in ballots did get processed for only Mayor Karen Bass and Nithya Raman but it was “a glitch”
So did they eliminate the votes that were counted for Bass and Raman during this "glitch"?
Popular
Back to top

1






