Started By
Message

re: Test of steel prototype for border wall showed it could be sawed through

Posted on 1/10/19 at 8:47 am to
Posted by tigerinDC09
Washington, DC
Member since Nov 2011
4741 posts
Posted on 1/10/19 at 8:47 am to
Looks like Trump is gonna go around Congress:

quote:

POTUS on declaring a national emergency to build a wall: "I’ll probably will do it, maybe definitely.”


LINK
Posted by nugget
Mostly Peaceful Poster
Member since Dec 2009
13821 posts
Posted on 1/10/19 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Kind of proves the success of the wall. So they will go to another access point, not protected by a wall, but heavily patrolled by border patrol. Not seeing the negative here.


Exactly. Tiger n DC isn't one of the bright ones. He wants us to just man the entire 2000 miles and have some "technology". You can saw through the wall? You can also shoot a border patrol agent or blow up "technology". It's not easy to cut through steel.

They were better off when they were saying it's immoral.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124189 posts
Posted on 1/10/19 at 8:51 am to
Just proves again, this "wall" is a waste of time and money.
quote:

Steel bollard fencing has been used under previous administrations.
quote:

Steel bollard fencing has been used under previous administrations.
quote:

Steel bollard fencing has been used under previous administrations.
quote:

Steel bollard fencing has been used under previous administrations.
quote:

Steel bollard fencing has been used under previous administrations.
quote:

Steel bollard fencing has been used under previous administrations.
quote:

Steel bollard fencing has been used under previous administrations.
quote:

Steel bollard fencing has been used under previous administrations.
quote:

Steel bollard fencing has been used under previous administrations.
quote:

Steel bollard fencing has been used under previous administrations.
quote:

Steel bollard fencing has been used under previous administrations.

¿comprende?
Posted by tigerinDC09
Washington, DC
Member since Nov 2011
4741 posts
Posted on 1/10/19 at 8:53 am to
quote:

You can saw through the wall? You can also shoot a border patrol agent or blow up "technology". It's not easy to cut through steel.


Again, I was told in this thread that they are smarter than we think and they will find another way not to get caught.

Ya'll should get your talking points straight.
Posted by nugget
Mostly Peaceful Poster
Member since Dec 2009
13821 posts
Posted on 1/10/19 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Again, I was told in this thread that they are smarter than we think and they will find another way not to get caught. Ya'll should get your talking points straight.


They will find another way in. But if you limit 90% of the opportunity, it's a lot easier to catch them on the other 10%. It's funny how all you people that rely so heavily on the federal government to survive want less spending just this one time
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22392 posts
Posted on 1/10/19 at 9:08 am to
I mean people could blow make a hole in any “wall/barrier” but how long would it take and how quickly would we be able to react.

I would hope there is also a montoring portion of the “ wall” where you could tell if people are trying to tamper with it.

The wall/barrier would be the first line of protection. As with any protection system, anybody prudent person would want multiple levels of protection.

This post was edited on 1/10/19 at 9:10 am
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 1/10/19 at 9:25 am to
quote:

why are you guys so opposed to a wall...



quote:

President George W Bush tried to build a barrier in certain places and it was held up by years of legal wrangling and ultimately abandoned in certain places because people own the land privately. This will probably happen again.


this didn't answer my question. why are you opposed to the wall?
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
33962 posts
Posted on 1/10/19 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Just proves again, you're an idiot

Posted by tigerinDC09
Washington, DC
Member since Nov 2011
4741 posts
Posted on 1/10/19 at 9:34 am to
quote:

this didn't answer my question. why are you opposed to the wall?


It does answer your question. It is impractical.

It it the least effective and most expensive option.

Fiscal conservatives should be against this tax payer funded boondoggle (That Trump promised Mexico would pay for).
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126966 posts
Posted on 1/10/19 at 9:35 am to
quote:

tigerinDC09
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 1/10/19 at 10:07 am to
quote:

It it the least effective and most expensive option.



neither of these statements are factually correct

quote:

Fiscal conservatives should be against this tax payer funded boondoggle


fiscal conservatives are ok with 5 billion if it cuts down on the 130 billion spent on illegal immigrants each year

meanwhile Democrats want to send 12 billion overseas for abortions.
This post was edited on 1/10/19 at 10:09 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram