- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Talk about Bannon stating blankly that Trump will serve a 3rd term.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:28 pm to FLTech
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:28 pm to FLTech
I would be good with DJT as POTUS indefinitely, but he is getting up there in age. Im on the Vance train for 2028, but he needs to adjust on H1B. America is for Americans, not for Indians/Chinese/fill in blank non Americans
2
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:30 pm to 3down10
lol I actually do. He was at the White House today - in the oval intact.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:30 pm to Odysseus32
Even if it was constitutional, Trump is too old for another 7 to 8 years.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:33 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
lol I actually do. He was at the White House today - in the oval intact.
No, you're full of shite.
It's not even the type of thing they would be discussing right now. And it's certainly not the type of shite some "insider" would be leaking for you to spread on message boards.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:35 pm to 3down10
quote:
Liberals certainly won't vote for him.
They didn’t vote for him before why would that change in the future?
The discussion is as to whether he can and the answer there seems to be… maybe pending an inevitable court challenge.
He would also be facing a tough primary coalition of Vance/elon/Thiel/GOPe but with a successful term their path to a primary win would be extremely tough so long as Trumps brand remains strong.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:39 pm to tide06
quote:
They didn’t vote for him before why would that change in the future?
Yes exactly. Thus he has to maintain the votes he got in the previous election.
quote:
The discussion is as to whether he can and the answer there seems to be… maybe pending an inevitable court challenge.
He would also be facing a tough primary coalition of Vance/elon/Thiel/GOPe but with a successful term their path to a primary win would be extremely tough so long as Trumps brand remains strong.
It's against the constitution for him to run. If he wants to run they can get an amendment with 2/3rds majority. I'm actually not generally in favor of term limits, but I am very much about following the constitution.
I wouldn't vote for Trump if he ran again under those circumstances. Nor should anyone else who cares about the constitution.
Many here sound like loyalists, not conservatives or really even Americans.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:46 pm to tide06
quote:
The discussion is as to whether he can and the answer there seems to be… maybe pending an inevitable court challenge.
Talk about the court challenge. Give us your thoughts on how the plain text of the 12th and 22nd amendments would not apply. Don’t quote anyone else, don’t link something outside of the law. Your thoughts.
(You won’t do it)
This post was edited on 10/23/25 at 10:48 pm
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:51 pm to Odysseus32
quote:
Calm down son.
Son? Unless you were born in the first quarter of the last century, I don't see how you would be referring to this term.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:54 pm to 3down10
quote:
It's against the constitution for him to run.
Again, that’s not at all clear depending on how it’s executed. It’s also not clear at that point if he decided to if he would be running against a VP ticket with Obama on the other side.
It’s also worth pointing out that the GOP path to winning the White House with a MAGA candidate has never been easier than it will be in 2028.
-FL and TX just added major electoral votes at the expense of blue states (TX = 40, FL = 30 +8 net).
-If the 2024 election were held today Trump would’ve won 10 additional electoral votes which is akin to winning AZ, WI or MN.
-PA is almost even in terms of voter registration for the first time in a long time.
-FL is hard red
-OH is hard red
-TX is solid red
All he or any GOP candidate who can hold the blue collar base by promising to fight globalization needs to do is to hold GA and NC and he could lose WI+MI+AZ+NV and still win.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:58 pm to tide06
quote:
Again, that’s not at all clear depending on how it’s executed.
It’s incredibly clear. You just keep ignoring it because you ran out of Twitter posts to repeat.
quote:
Obama
Also not eligible outside of opinions proffered by attention seeking blue checks.
Plain. Language.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:59 pm to Indefatigable
What’s wrong with you?
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:02 pm to dgnx6
People lying and/or being objectively wrong
This post was edited on 10/23/25 at 11:04 pm
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:04 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Talk about the court challenge.
Your side would be challenging his eligibility, not the other way around.
You would have to win an argument in front of the Supreme Court to prove him ineligible to run as VP.
A 6-3 GOP Supreme Court.
Leveraging untested case law.
It would come down to whether they deem the word elected to include appointed. If they don’t, he would win the case.
You can act like you know the answer to how it would go but you don’t. No one does regardless of whether it’s Trump or Obama.
This post was edited on 10/23/25 at 11:14 pm
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:12 pm to Riverside
receipts!
he voted trump in 2016
fraud biden in 2020
and kamala in 2024
he voted trump in 2016
fraud biden in 2020
and kamala in 2024
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:13 pm to tide06
quote:
Your side
Three time Trump voter
quote:
You would have to win an argument in front of the Supreme Court to prove him ineligible to run as VP. A 5-3 GOP Supreme Court.
A court that POTUS specifically populated with originalist and textualist judges.
quote:
It would come down to whether they deem the word elected to include appointed
No, it wouldn’t, at all. The 12th amendment is perfectly clear.
quote:
But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.
The words elected and appointed do not appear at all.
The 22nd is equally clear
quote:
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice
Nothing about any appointment is ever relevant to the discussion.
The 12th Amendment plainly prevents anyone ineligible to be POTUS from holding the office of VPOTUS.
Now, as I’ve said. A former POTUS COULD exploit this language to work their way back to POTUS via becoming Speaker of the House or Senate Pro Temp. But under no circumstance could a person elected POTUS twice stand for election as VPOTUS or serve or be appointed as VPOTUS.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:14 pm to GeauxBurrow312
lets see trump versus obama for a 3rd term.
set a precedent
amend the constitution.
set a precedent
amend the constitution.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:25 pm to tide06
quote:
Again, that’s not at all clear depending on how it’s executed. It’s also not clear at that point if he decided to if he would be running against a VP ticket with Obama on the other side.
It’s also worth pointing out that the GOP path to winning the White House with a MAGA candidate has never been easier than it will be in 2028.
-FL and TX just added major electoral votes at the expense of blue states (TX = 40, FL = 30 +8 net).
-If the 2024 election were held today Trump would’ve won 10 additional electoral votes which is akin to winning AZ, WI or MN.
-PA is almost even in terms of voter registration for the first time in a long time.
-FL is hard red
-OH is hard red
-TX is solid red
All he or any GOP candidate who can hold the blue collar base by promising to fight globalization needs to do is to hold GA and NC and he could lose WI+MI+AZ+NV and still win.
He will not get the support of many conservatives if he tries to by pass the constitution.
He will not get the support of liberals either.
He won't get the support of neocons who hate him and only try to manipulate him.
So good luck on your quest to out dumbass the democrats with your unconstitutional loyalist fantasy.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:40 pm to MemphisGuy
In his first term.. he spent 2 years fighting a FAKE, MADE UP LIE/HOAX and couldn’t do shite then and when he started rolling, they attacked our country with a fricking bio weapon which basically made his last year a lame duck.
So basically he got one solid year of working on his agenda when he should have had a solid 4 years
Look, I don’t care if he is the next president or not.. I know whoever takes his spot will do great things for the MAGA movement but just admit that he got screwed- there is now concrete solid evidence all over the place that they destroyed his first term - he should at least get two years back from the fake made up hoax
It’s amazing to me how democrats, TDS and Panicans can see all of the evidence of all of the crimes that were committed against him, his family and his advisors and you fricking people refuse to believe it but were perfectly ok with the VP hiding Joe Biden’s mental capacity.
The #1 reason why people have TDS is because of the Russia Gate fake hoax and the entire fricking thing was FAKE. It was a made up story.. it was a fricking lie and they were ALL part of it.
So basically he got one solid year of working on his agenda when he should have had a solid 4 years
Look, I don’t care if he is the next president or not.. I know whoever takes his spot will do great things for the MAGA movement but just admit that he got screwed- there is now concrete solid evidence all over the place that they destroyed his first term - he should at least get two years back from the fake made up hoax
It’s amazing to me how democrats, TDS and Panicans can see all of the evidence of all of the crimes that were committed against him, his family and his advisors and you fricking people refuse to believe it but were perfectly ok with the VP hiding Joe Biden’s mental capacity.
The #1 reason why people have TDS is because of the Russia Gate fake hoax and the entire fricking thing was FAKE. It was a made up story.. it was a fricking lie and they were ALL part of it.
This post was edited on 10/23/25 at 11:42 pm
Posted on 10/24/25 at 12:44 am to FLTech
quote:
It’s amazing to me how democrats, TDS and Panicans can see all of the evidence of all of the crimes that were committed against him, his family and his advisors and you fricking people refuse to believe it but were perfectly ok with the VP hiding Joe Biden’s mental capacity.
Oh go frick yourself with this bullshite. The things you are talking about is one of the main reasons I was a first time Trump voter in 2024.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 5:44 am to Odysseus32
quote:
Trump will serve a 3rd term
Will never happen.
Its a democratic party mental illness.
Page 6 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News