Started By
Message

re: Talk about Bannon stating blankly that Trump will serve a 3rd term.

Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:05 pm to
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35783 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:05 pm to
And you’re just trolling.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35783 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

He could probably run as a VP

No, he cannot.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35783 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:07 pm to
quote:

constitutional amendment.

May possibly never happen again. Congress will never pass anything like this and the States won’t ratify it.

Unless you’re one of the retard constitutional convention people.
This post was edited on 10/23/25 at 9:08 pm
Posted by geoag58
Member since Nov 2011
1626 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:07 pm to
quote:

That sounds a lot like rationalization.


Don't give his two years back to Trump. But give the perpetrators, who caused the lost two years, the absolute maximum penalty for essentially a traitorous coup.
Posted by Odysseus32
Member since Dec 2009
9819 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:08 pm to
I’m not trolling.

I can’t imagine this is getting play on republican media.

I want people on this board to see it. Do with the info what you will. I genuinely think at least everyone needs to see this guy say this stuff.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

It can't be done without changing the constitution.


Unless something extraordinary happens like a ME country hitting NYC with a nuclear bomb and Trump is forced to call off the November’28 presidential election and implement martial law.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
85447 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:09 pm to
He has to serve a third term because it’s before his FOURTH term which is when it has been foretold that he will release the Kraken.

The things you people don’t know…
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35783 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

genuinely think at least everyone needs to see this guy say this stuff.

Why? Why should anyone care what some internet person says on video to other internet people?
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35783 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

Trump is forced to call off the November’28 presidential election and implement martial law.

Not possible. There is no mechanism whatsoever under any circumstance for POTUS to suspend any election.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:10 pm to
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
23307 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:11 pm to
Donnie will go home and play golf.....his mark will last forEVER!
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
22788 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

That sounds a lot like rationalization.


Correct. it won't happen. Trump is working like hell to get everything done in his remaining three plus years. In a little over a year, we will be at the start of the 2028m presidential election and the declaration of candidates.
Posted by Odysseus32
Member since Dec 2009
9819 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:13 pm to
I think that when someone who is historically close to the president says something like this, people should see it.

Personally, I think it has merit. I know a lot of people on this board do not. I think that’s fine.

But at the very least it deserves attention. If it’s garbage, it’s garbage. People can think for themselves on if it’s garbage.

This is a political forum. This is certainly political content. I don’t see why it matters if we bring it to light.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
38241 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:15 pm to
quote:



Unless something extraordinary happens like a ME country hitting NYC with a nuclear bomb and Trump is forced to call off the November’28 presidential election and implement martial law.


We aren't Ukraine, we still have elections during war. We even had an election during the Civil War.




Posted by FLTech
Member since Sep 2017
25178 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:15 pm to
If you were a football coach on a 4 year contract and had to spend your first two seasons defending a fake court case about you raping some chick - then was terminated for raping someone voiding your contract and 10 years later it came out that you were 100% innocent... you would just sit back and move on or would you fight for the money in your contract that you lost because of the fake hoax?
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
38241 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

I think that when someone who is historically close to the president says something like this, people should see it.

Personally, I think it has merit. I know a lot of people on this board do not. I think that’s fine.

But at the very least it deserves attention. If it’s garbage, it’s garbage. People can think for themselves on if it’s garbage.

This is a political forum. This is certainly political content. I don’t see why it matters if we bring it to light.


There is no legal route, and he doesn't have anywhere near the type of support even in the republican party to do something like this.

Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35783 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

Personally, I think it has merit.

Explain how and why. After all you aren’t a troll and genuinely believe it.


Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
38241 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

If you were a football coach on a 4 year contract and had to spend your first two seasons defending a fake court case about you raping some chick - then was terminated for raping someone voiding your contract and 10 years later it came out that you were 100% innocent... you would just sit back and move on or would you fight for the money in your contract that you lost because of the fake hoax?


The constitution is the law of the land. Not a contract that Trump signed that said he was entitled to certain things.

And btw, I'm not sure why the other party in your example is responsible for the actions of the person who lied. They don't owe anything, you'd need to sue the girl. The school didn't get a coach either.

If you don't want to conserve and defend the constitution, then you are not a conservative. You are someone who is trying to destroy the constitution.
This post was edited on 10/23/25 at 9:22 pm
Posted by BayouBandit24
Member since Aug 2010
17087 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:21 pm to
quote:

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.


The argument is that the 22nd Amendment ^ speaks to being elected president. So essentially, Trump would run as someone’s VP and then that person would step down after the election. Trump would then be president without being elected to the office of president again. Or something like that

Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23158 posts
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

that is a no-go.


Of course it's a no-go. Unless the constitution is amended, this isn't even worth talking about.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram