- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/2/18 at 7:53 pm to Sentrius
Susan Collins is on record as voting against a ban on partial birth abortions.
I know, as a man, I have no standing in commenting against abortion at all, but the practice of partial birth abortion seems rather horrific, IMHO.
I know, as a man, I have no standing in commenting against abortion at all, but the practice of partial birth abortion seems rather horrific, IMHO.
Posted on 7/2/18 at 8:18 pm to Pelican fan99
quote:
She will come around. Not even at all worried at anyone but McCain
Yep....
I think it’s a good thing.
I don’t want activist judges.
Also when she votes to approve it will take the wind out of the sails of the left.
Posted on 7/2/18 at 8:57 pm to DawgsLife
quote:Supporting stare decisis is hardly “activism.” Quite the opposite.
Out of curiosity. Would any judge who openly says he would support Roe Vs. Wade be an activist judge?
Posted on 7/2/18 at 9:04 pm to Sentrius
quote:
I've always said the GOP will never confirm anyone who wants to overturn Roe. You're a fool if you believe otherwis
I don’t think and I hope this court doesn’t touch it. Let individual freedom prevail over a religious morality agenda.
If this court is smart they don’t touch it.
This post was edited on 7/2/18 at 9:05 pm
Posted on 7/2/18 at 9:38 pm to ljhog
quote:
Heitkamp, Manchin, and McCaskill will support or fail to get reelected and they know it. Donnelly and Tester ain't far behind.
Then you don't know democrats. If they think they can knock Trump down by his own people failing him then you don't know frick all about democrats. When do those 3 vote with Republicans....when the vote doesn't mean a fricking thing. They would rather get carted out on their arse then let Trump win bro. Democrats do not....EVER...give their vote up away from the party. Democratic socialist nanny state Dems do not fray.
Posted on 7/2/18 at 9:52 pm to Sentrius
Susan Collins makes Nancy Pelosi look like she’s in her prime. I don’t see how some of these people keep getting elected. Hang it up Suze.
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:48 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
We got all these screwed up SCOTUS decisions because of ACTIVIST judges.
Which SCOTUS decisions do you think were screwed up because of ACTIVIST judges?
Posted on 7/2/18 at 11:54 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
Overturning Roe would be the reversal of an activist decision.
What is it about Roe that makes you conclude it was an activist decision?
Posted on 7/3/18 at 3:33 am to Sentrius
quote:
Susan Collins says she will not support any nominee who will overturn Roe v Wade
Roe v. Wade's about the 10th Amendment and judicial activism as relates to legislating from the bench not about hating women, these people need to get their heads out of their asses
Posted on 7/3/18 at 3:47 am to texridder
quote:
What is it about Roe that makes you conclude it was an activist decision?
I'm still trying to find the provision in the Constitution that states abortion is a right, I know the framers sure as hell never contemplated fetus killing in drafting the amendments so originalism dictates its within 10th Amendment authority
Posted on 7/3/18 at 3:25 pm to ThePTExperience1969
quote:
I'm still trying to find the provision in the Constitution that states abortion is a right,
The Court ruled that a right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion. It found that that right of privacy should be balanced against the Government's interests in regulating abortions - protecting women's health and protecting human life. The Court found that the Government's interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy. Balancing those 2 interests, the Court tied the Government's regulation of abortion to the third trimester of pregnancy.
Just in case you wanted to know.
Posted on 7/3/18 at 3:34 pm to beaverfever
quote:
Hang it up Suze.
Sometimes you gotta take someone you agree with 50% of the time, when the only other option in a place like Maine is someone you agree with 0% of the time
Posted on 7/3/18 at 3:42 pm to Sentrius
quote:
It's math. I've always said the GOP will never confirm anyone who wants to overturn Roe. You're a fool if you believe otherwise.
Roe V Wade is settled law. But so was slavery and Jim Crow laws. Those ideas were settled law and eventually society grew to realize how bad they were.
Just like abortion.
Posted on 7/3/18 at 3:42 pm to lsutiger90
quote:True but Maine was pretty close to going red in 2016.
Sometimes you gotta take someone you agree with 50% of the time, when the only other option in a place like Maine is someone you agree with 0% of the time
Posted on 7/3/18 at 4:11 pm to texridder
quote:
right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion.
With that logic, it extends to a person's decision to murder, you know how stupid you sound right now?
quote:
The Court ruled that a right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion.
That does not denote it's a right that exists and is constitutionally protected, thanks Judicial Activist remind me never to vote for you ever, when the Constitution is silent on an issue and the framers' intent never addressed an issue therefore it's delegated to the 10th Amendment and federal legislature under their Article I powers, federalism bitch
This post was edited on 7/3/18 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 7/3/18 at 4:19 pm to texridder
quote:
The Court ruled that a right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion. It found that that right of privacy should be balanced against the Government's interests in regulating abortions - protecting women's health and protecting human life. The Court found that the Government's interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy. Balancing those 2 interests, the Court tied the Government's regulation of abortion to the third trimester of pregnancy.
For a simple perspective, there's nothing in the Constitution nor is there anything represented by the framers' original intent that states any of this, it was a state law passed by the representatives legally elected by the citizens and complied with procedure for passing state laws therefore it's subject to Article V or legislative change per either Congress or the states BOOM
This post was edited on 7/3/18 at 4:20 pm
Posted on 7/3/18 at 4:58 pm to ThePTExperience1969
quote:
With that logic, it extends to a person's decision to murder, you know how stupid you sound right now?
No matter what, I couldn't possibly sound as stupid as you did in that statement.
quote:
That does not denote it's a right that exists and is constitutionally protected, thanks Judicial Activist remind me never to vote for you ever, when the Constitution is silent on an issue and the framers' intent never addressed an issue therefore it's delegated to the 10th Amendment and federal legislature under their Article I powers, federalism bitch
You see the amendments were adopted after Article 1 (hence, they are called amendments) that amended the constitution, in some instances to limit the powers in the constitution.
You obviously have no idea how the constitution and amendments relate to each other. No only that, when it suits your (absurd) argument, you cite the 10th amendment while disregarding the 14th.
You're lucky they still don't have literacy tests, or you couldn't vote at all.
Posted on 7/3/18 at 5:08 pm to Sentrius
quote:
"That would indicate an activist's agenda that I don't want to see a judge have"
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News