- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Supreme Court strikes down lower court block on Texas redistricting map
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:21 am
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:21 am
How will this affect VA?
All red states need to do away with any blue seats
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. All red states need to do away with any blue seats
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:44 am to stout
This is a shitty sequence of events.
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:47 am to stout
quote:
All red states need to do away with any blue seats
Now!
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:48 am to stout
quote:
Supreme Court strikes down lower court block on Texas redistricting map
Now do Florida. frick Virginia!
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:50 am to LSUROXS
Posted on 4/27/26 at 10:01 am to stout
Posted on 4/27/26 at 10:07 am to stout
quote:
How will this affect VA?
as i understand it there are multiple state issues that are being pursued.
LINK
1) the process of the amendment
Republican National Committee v. Virginia Department of Elections Commissioner Steven Koski
quote:
RNC and other Republicans filed the lawsuit in February, arguing the amendment is unconstitutional because it was not approved by two different assemblies and because voting started less than 90 days after final passage of the amendment.
The April 21 ballot referendum was for a constitutional amendment, which by law requires the General Assembly to pass the measure twice with a House of Delegates election in between. Democrats argue they followed state code because they first approved the measure in fall 2025, followed by a House election in November, and a second vote of approval in January.
2) process for amending a special section was not followed
Virginia House Speaker Don Scott v. Virginia Republican Senate Minority Leader Ryan McDougle
quote:
McDougle, who’s also a member of Virginia’s Redistricting Commission, is among the plaintiffs challenging the General Assembly’s October special session called to initiate the ballot referendum. They assert only the governor, not Scott, may convene or expand the scope of a special session. When they filed the lawsuit in October, they attempted to block the introduction of the constitutional amendment, arguing it violated the state constitution.
3) breach of 2021 maps approved by virginia supreme court
Republican National Committee v. Virginia State Board of Elections
quote:
In a separate case, Republican plaintiffs are also challenging state lawmakers’ authority to alter the congressional maps approved by the Virginia Supreme Court in 2021. Plaintiffs argue the new maps are not “compact,” as required by the state constitution, and that they “completely destroy” the current maps by replacing them with “a radically different” set of congressional district lines. The lawsuit seeks to block the General Assembly from repealing the 2021 map.
Posted on 4/27/26 at 10:24 am to stout
In the end, it’s going to have to do with process. Probably the main challenge to the Virginia redistricting is how they worded the proposition on the ballot. Unlike Texas, it appears that Virginia needs a statewide vote to redistrict. The ballot proposal did not provide a map or even indicate how the redistricting map was going to change. Instead, it only referred to making Virginia elections “more fair.“ That seems rather a vague and ambiguous.
In Texas, the only requirement was voted a legislature. I haven’t read the case (and really don’t plan to), however, I’m guessing that the Supreme Court basically said that Texas had complied with the requirements to redistrict.
So at this point, it would seem that as long as states follow their own rules, laws, and constitutions, they can gerrymander.
In Texas, the only requirement was voted a legislature. I haven’t read the case (and really don’t plan to), however, I’m guessing that the Supreme Court basically said that Texas had complied with the requirements to redistrict.
So at this point, it would seem that as long as states follow their own rules, laws, and constitutions, they can gerrymander.
Posted on 4/27/26 at 10:24 am to SoFlaGuy
quote:
Gloves are off.
Yup. Good. I spend a lot of time in Ft. Lauderdale and Clearwater. Probably moving to Ft. Lauderdale within the next several months. I can't wait to leave this commie conclave I'm currently in.
Posted on 4/27/26 at 10:32 am to stout
VA is purely an issue of state law. SCOTUS won't touch it, regardless of outcome.
Popular
Back to top

7








