Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Supreme Court strikes down lower court block on Texas redistricting map

Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:21 am
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182290 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:21 am
How will this affect VA?






All red states need to do away with any blue seats
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65349 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:44 am to
This is a shitty sequence of events.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
39654 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:47 am to
quote:

All red states need to do away with any blue seats



Now!
Posted by LSUROXS
Texas
Member since Sep 2006
8650 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Supreme Court strikes down lower court block on Texas redistricting map


Now do Florida. frick Virginia!
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182290 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:50 am to
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182290 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 10:01 am to
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
14811 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 10:07 am to
quote:


How will this affect VA?


as i understand it there are multiple state issues that are being pursued.

LINK

1) the process of the amendment

Republican National Committee v. Virginia Department of Elections Commissioner Steven Koski

quote:

RNC and other Republicans filed the lawsuit in February, arguing the amendment is unconstitutional because it was not approved by two different assemblies and because voting started less than 90 days after final passage of the amendment.

The April 21 ballot referendum was for a constitutional amendment, which by law requires the General Assembly to pass the measure twice with a House of Delegates election in between. Democrats argue they followed state code because they first approved the measure in fall 2025, followed by a House election in November, and a second vote of approval in January.


2) process for amending a special section was not followed

Virginia House Speaker Don Scott v. Virginia Republican Senate Minority Leader Ryan McDougle


quote:

McDougle, who’s also a member of Virginia’s Redistricting Commission, is among the plaintiffs challenging the General Assembly’s October special session called to initiate the ballot referendum. They assert only the governor, not Scott, may convene or expand the scope of a special session. When they filed the lawsuit in October, they attempted to block the introduction of the constitutional amendment, arguing it violated the state constitution.


3) breach of 2021 maps approved by virginia supreme court

Republican National Committee v. Virginia State Board of Elections

quote:

In a separate case, Republican plaintiffs are also challenging state lawmakers’ authority to alter the congressional maps approved by the Virginia Supreme Court in 2021. Plaintiffs argue the new maps are not “compact,” as required by the state constitution, and that they “completely destroy” the current maps by replacing them with “a radically different” set of congressional district lines. The lawsuit seeks to block the General Assembly from repealing the 2021 map.


Posted by SoFlaGuy
Fort Lauderdale
Member since Apr 2020
3198 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 10:08 am to
Gloves are off.
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
24460 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 10:24 am to
In the end, it’s going to have to do with process. Probably the main challenge to the Virginia redistricting is how they worded the proposition on the ballot. Unlike Texas, it appears that Virginia needs a statewide vote to redistrict. The ballot proposal did not provide a map or even indicate how the redistricting map was going to change. Instead, it only referred to making Virginia elections “more fair.“ That seems rather a vague and ambiguous.

In Texas, the only requirement was voted a legislature. I haven’t read the case (and really don’t plan to), however, I’m guessing that the Supreme Court basically said that Texas had complied with the requirements to redistrict.

So at this point, it would seem that as long as states follow their own rules, laws, and constitutions, they can gerrymander.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
13609 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 10:24 am to
quote:


Gloves are off.


Yup. Good. I spend a lot of time in Ft. Lauderdale and Clearwater. Probably moving to Ft. Lauderdale within the next several months. I can't wait to leave this commie conclave I'm currently in.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115373 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 10:32 am to
VA is purely an issue of state law. SCOTUS won't touch it, regardless of outcome.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram