Started By
Message

re: Stunning Admission By Renowned Atheist; Decline of Christianity is Hurting Society

Posted on 11/7/19 at 6:27 pm to
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46671 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

we would just have various moral preferences that we like over others.


Which is a pretty good one line summary of recorded human history. It’s essentially a long story of various social and moral systems attempting to subjugate each other.
Posted by Perfect Circle
S W Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
7907 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 6:30 pm to
Dawkins is expecting society to unravel and deteriorate very quickly should our country's moral foundation continue to erode. Looking at the state of things it's kind of hard to argue.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28192 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

But that’s the case regardless of whether or not evolution by natural selection occurs, because there is absolutely no evidence that good or evil as universal concepts exists. If they did, we should have seen them manifest in nature long before sentient consciousness arose and then we should have seen some form of consistency once it did.


I don't disagree, I'm just pointing out that herd "morality" is strictly utilitarian in nature. When most people speak of morality they're talking about concepts like right vs wrong, good vs evil. Herd or evolved morality can't address those concepts.

ETA I do disagree on the idea that good and evil should have been manifest prior to humanity, because my worldview only applies them to humanity.
This post was edited on 11/7/19 at 6:36 pm
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46671 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 6:37 pm to
Sure, and that’s because we’re conditioned to do so. We’re all taught things are “right” or “wrong” from a very young age and our perception naturally comes to see these concepts as universal. In the context of human history that’s obviously nonsense but it makes sense within our small bubbles of influence.

Given enough time and consistency I can confer essentially any moral truth I wish onto a toddler. I can raise a child in an isolated forest cabin to believe that only by eating other humans can we keep the sun from exploding and, theoretically, keep them convinced of that their entire lives. They would never think twice about killing other people.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

Nietzche's best thinking led him to the conclusion that life is only worth living if there are goals worth living for. Brilliant.


Well he’s not completely wrong.
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13638 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 6:46 pm to
Did this moron finally read Kant for the first time in his 50s and acts like it’s a big revelation?

Any student of philosophy who has digested much of anything before the 20th century would have come to the same conclusion long ago. I did at age 14.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

Dawkins is expecting society to unravel and deteriorate very quickly should our country's moral foundation continue to erode. Looking at the state of things it's kind of hard to argue.



Utterly idiotic. Along numerous metrics we are doing better than ever. People are richer, living longer, the FBI crime index for total crimes in the US is lower (or equal to, I can't remember off the top of my head) the US total crime index before the drug war, and things are, in pretty much every sense, better than they were in decades previous.

There are problems, but technology has amplified those problems to degrees that I don't think humans can deal with, or at least, we are in a state of culture lag until we develop new norms (which we are developing as we speak) about how to include technology in our lives. We don't live in a utopia by any means, and there are challenges to be had. But I think he's inventing something out of nothing, and doing so out of fear and ignorance.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
55769 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

l law-giver.

The point of discussing objectivity vs. subjectivity in terms of morality is to show that if we rely on ourselves as human beings to determine morality, there cannot be an objective basis to condemn one version of morality and praise another; we would just have various moral preferences that we like over others.


Great explanation. You’re tightening the screws of moral relativism down and atheists get very uncomfortable when their beliefs of morality are eventually proven to be seriously flawed. If you work really hard sometimes you can get an atheist to admit they don’t want a Creator/God to hold them accountable for their morality. You’ll even get atheists to admit if God revealed himself to them they would still reject him because God is immoral and unloving for subjecting them to the unpleasant circumstances of His creation. These same atheists will tell you they have the right and duty to discipline their own child so the child understands how to conduct themselves in a responsible manner.....yet they fail to understand that discipline and ultimately morality is exactly what the Father has offered them and the world through His Commandments, His Word and His Truth!
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28192 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

Given enough time and consistency I can confer essentially any moral truth I wish onto a toddler.


Onto a toddler, yes. It's not uncommon at all for youth to reject the value system of their parents as they grow older, though.

I looked through some of your posts in this topic to get some context, and I get where you're coming from. But you're wrong that the "entire field" of apologetics falls apart if you acknowledge that there's no objective morality. It's only one argument. A powerful one for most people, which is why you see a lot of atheists attempt to justify an objective moral code sans the supernatural, but it's not even close to being the whole of the subject matter.
Posted by Bunsbert Montcroff
Boise ID
Member since Jan 2008
5770 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

It's a statement of truth.

only if you accept the premise, that's the point.
quote:

You're not quite understanding what "objective" means in terms of morality. Objectivity is something universal derived from outside of our particular human minds, like laws of logic. Subjectivity is something particular to ourselves, such as our feelings or personal desires.

actually, i think you are not grasping what "objective" means. or at least how the term can refer to precepts outside of the realm of your religious worldview. because act utilitarianism and the categorical imperative are both morally objective.
quote:

My premise makes the concept of moral absolutes intelligible and coherent with the world we live in. Utilitarianism doesn't and can't.


utilitarianism, and the categorical imperative, which i mentioned earlier both do and can. you're still not really getting what "objective" means. no sweat.
quote:

Morality as preference is the natural result of morality outside of the Biblical God, which is what I said in the beginning. While you can espouse that belief, you don't live that way; no one does. In our every day lives, we live as if moral absolutes exist, yet can't justify that notion outside of God.


what macantyre is saying is that the intellectual premise is a matter of preference, and the morality derives from that premise. that's been my point all along. again, no sweat. you seem like a smart guy, so you will transcend this kind of thinking soon, god willing : )
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28181 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

No, it's correct. The logical conclusion of moral subjectivity is that there is no actual moral or immoral behavior; there is just what happens in this natural world, like a lion killing and eating a zebra.


Since taste is subjective, we can't comment on how ice cream tastes better than dog shite?

Subjectivity isn't nearly as hopeless as you paint it to be.

Also, maybe I missed it, but how are you not in the same boat?

If God commands someone to kill slaughter a school, how can you say its wrong? While I cannot call a school shooting objectively wrong, you can't either if your God commands it. And seeing all the violence, genocide, and killing for petty reasons in the Bible you can't argue that there isn't a history of such things to point to when making this point.
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

According to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 110 million Americans are infected with some form of STD. So with a population of about 323 million that means one-in-three Americans are infected.


Curious how that seems to correlate with the number of liberal voters in the country.
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

And seeing all the violence, genocide, and killing for petty reasons in the Bible


Wrong book, Sherlock.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28181 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

Wrong book,


Should probably read the thing if you're going to devote your life to it.
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

This is such a ridiculous talking point. Japan and South Korea are doing very well even without Christianity.


Japan is headed for extinction in another three or four generations.

30% of the population of South Korea is Christian, roughly the same as the United States.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

I'm not religious at all but have always understood the teachings of the church were necessary for an ordered society.


No, they aren't. It certainly makes it easier to control the ignorant masses, but it isn't a requirement.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

Wrong book




Convenient.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28192 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

actually, i think you are not grasping what "objective" means.


One of you isn't. It's not him.
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
18642 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 7:21 pm to
I believe in reincarnation of spirit. But, I agree with what he said.

I follow some of the biblical beliefs of treating others how I want to be treated. Mainly because I feel that if everyone followed that belief, that society would be a lot calmer.

Right now, a large percentage of our society dehumanizes everyone else. When you start dehumanizing , it leads to beating up little kids, beating up women, molesting children, or physically attacking people just because of petty shite.






Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 11/7/19 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

Renowned Atheist


Who? Murray?
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram