- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:43 pm to omegaman66
quote:
SFP think a military insurrection is "following the law"!
That sounds strawman-ish.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Definition: A straw man argument attacks a distorted version of an opponent's position instead of their actual argument.
That sounds strawman-ish.
Strawman-ish like creating the narrative that the President "may", "could" or "might" ask the military to do something illegal (with zero supporting evidence), while ignoring that biden issued illegal orders for the military to take the covid jab?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:04 pm to RollTide4547
quote:
while ignoring that biden issued illegal orders for the military to take the covid jab?
DoD settles COVID vaccine mandate lawsuits for $1.8 million
quote:
Two lawsuits filed by service members challenging the Defense Department’s now-defunct COVID-19 vaccine mandate have ended in a settlement, according to an agreement filed Tuesday in a Florida federal court.
A judge awarded Liberty Counsel, the firm representing plaintiffs in Navy SEALs 1-26 v. Biden and Colonel Financial Management Officer, et al. v. Austin, $1.8 million to cover legal fees incurred during the cases, which were filed following Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s fall 2021 announcement that the COVID-19 vaccine would become mandatory for all troops.
“The military COVID shot mandate is dead,” Mat Staver, Liberty Counsel’s chairman, said in a statement. “Our heroic service members can no longer be forced to take this experimental jab that conflicts with their religious convictions.”
Those soldiers weren't committing sedition, either.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:That's what you got? GD you are stupid. Biden issued Illegal Orders to the troops, that's why the settlement. They and you were not worried about illegal orders being issued then. Those soldiers who refused were not "protecting the constitution" by refusing to follow the illegal orders. Now, it is the end of Democracy.
Those soldiers weren't committing sedition, either.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
I didn't catch any hint of the caveat that the soldiers who are supposed to dsobey "illegal" orders should wait for a court ruling to fully clarify for them what those are. I'm sure that's what those congress people really meant, though.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:47 pm to Timeoday
notice they didn't address the Marines. 
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:51 pm to RollTide4547
quote:
Biden issued Illegal Orders to the troops, that's why the settlement.
Yes, the settlement implies the order was illegal, and they were compensated.
Also, as I said, they were not prosecuted for sedition, either.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:55 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I didn't catch any hint of the caveat that the soldiers who are supposed to dsobey "illegal" orders should wait for a court ruling to fully clarify for them what those are. I'm sure that's what those congress people really meant, though.
Prominent attorney and jag officer phones are ringing off of the hook. Some of them are so inundated so are leaving a pre-recorded message:
"If you are a soldier in the US Military Please Repeat This 10 Times Over In Your Head:
I did not ever knowingly follow an illegal order."
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:I never said that either. I said you libs weren't worried about "illegal orders" when those military folks were being screwed over...
Also, as I said, they were not prosecuted for sedition, either.
quote:As long as you are "compensated", I can stomp a mudhole arse? If so, sign me up.
they were compensated.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:21 pm to Chaz95
Well, you gotta hand it to the politicians. They only want numbers. Hence no mention of the Marines. After all, there are few but they are proud.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:30 pm to Timeoday
SFP getting arse handed to him again - like clockwork
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:31 pm to dafif
quote:
SFP getting arse handed to him again
Posted on 11/20/25 at 5:07 pm to dafif
Gotta hand it to him. He is doing the best he can. Either he goes back to the drawing board or changes his avatar. A little bit of my money is on the avatar change because I feel SFP, subconsciously, is drawing closer to MAGA. His pride is simply in the way of his moment in time.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 5:25 pm to Timeoday
quote:
After listening, these people to a person, must be arrested.
For telling people to not follow “illegal” orders?
So hypothetically: if they someone in the military is given the order to shoot an innocent 2 year old.
You’re arguing they should obey that order?
And the people that say otherwise should be arrested?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 5:28 pm to cssamerican
quote:
The question is what are these supposedly unconstitutional illegal orders and who is issuing these unconstitutional illegal orders?
Ask the people calling those in the video traitors.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 5:30 pm to AlterEd
quote:
and told them not to follow his orders
The video I saw and heard said to not follow illegal orders. It don’t say anything about not following orders from Trump.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 5:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
Political puffery has wound up in two assassination attempts on the current president and the murder of a Christian man who spoke nothing but truth.
If you are incapable of seeing the damage/actions these statements encourage you are willfully blind.
If you are incapable of seeing the damage/actions these statements encourage you are willfully blind.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 7:15 pm to lsugorilla
quote:
For telling people to not follow “illegal” orders?
So hypothetically: if they someone in the military is given the order to shoot an innocent 2 year old.
You’re arguing they should obey that order?
And the people that say otherwise should be arrested?
For telling people to question orders? For some reason the democrat politicians can not provide any illegal orders. What if you turn on your radio tomorrow and the mayor says for you to make up your on mind for the police will lie to you? How will it make you feel?
So hypothetically: if they someone in the military is given the order to shoot an innocent 2 year old.
You’re arguing they should obey that order? Of Course Not.
And the people that put doubt into a soldiers mind regarding military command orders should be arrested? Yes.
Now how do you feel since the police are not lying to you?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 7:25 pm to Timeoday
quote:
You’re arguing they should obey that order? Of Course Not.
And the people that put doubt into a soldiers mind regarding military command orders should be arrested? Yes.
When are you turning yourself in?
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News