Started By
Message
locked post

Steele relied on claims posted by a random person on CNN website to "verify" dossier

Posted on 3/16/19 at 11:59 am
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 11:59 am
quote:

Chris Steele used an article from “CNN iReports” to “verify” one of his dossier memos alleging Webzilla hacked the DNC

Except “iReports” are posted by the public & not vetted, fact checked or screened before posting


The Clinton paid-for dossier has been FULLY debunked and discredited. I feel bad for anyone who still believes it was verified or is factual

Again, I ask our liberal friends this question. Please answer honestly:

If the dossier contained false statements and disinformation, then why did Comey, Rod, Yates, etc. present it to the FISA courts as being factual and verified??

—Pic 1: Steele court deposition
—Pic 2: CNN iReport website





LINK

So Steele didn't even put forth ANY EFFORT to verify most claims in his dossier. Just for example he spelled Alfa Bank "Alpha" and Manafort "Mannafort"

Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:01 pm to
and NONE of this that has been coming out daily for the last few weeks is being covered

propagandists, not media
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127401 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:02 pm to
Deep State says “Don’t care, had FISA.”
Posted by The Funnie Five
Bluffington
Member since Feb 2019
3404 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:03 pm to
Sarah Sanders posted this on her twitter and all the NPCs replying were saying "NUH UH! ITS TOTALLY 100% TRUE! STEELE IS LEGIT!"
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

and NONE of this that has been coming out daily for the last few weeks is being covered

propagandists, not media

TigerDoc for example was pimping the dossier just yesterday even though he admitted there were FALSE STATEMENTS AND DISINFORMATION in it.

So why did Comey and co. say it was fully verified and accurate when they presented it to the FISA court??

Not ONE democrat has answered this question yet
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

"NUH UH! ITS TOTALLY 100% TRUE! STEELE IS LEGIT!"

Even STEELE himself said in a court filing last year that he didn't even know if it was accurate. He said it was only "raw intelligence and had only a 50/50 shot of being accurate"

He didn't even trust his own work. Those who think the dossier has ANY credibility are fully brainwashed and don't like facts
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

why did Comey, Rod, Yates, etc. present it to the FISA courts as being factual and verified??

They never said the dossier was "factual and verified", in fact, they made a point to say it was oppo research

You can honestly argue that it shouldn't have been included in the warrant app, but you don't have to make things up
Posted by The Funnie Five
Bluffington
Member since Feb 2019
3404 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

They never said the dossier was "factual and verified", in fact, they made a point to say it was oppo research

You can honestly argue that it shouldn't have been included in the warrant app, but you don't have to make things up



Do you not see the problem with your post here?

The problem is that the DOJ presented this to the FISA courts as the ONLY piece of evidence. So if they never said it was factual and verified, it should have never been submitted as evidence, meaning the FISA warrants NEVER GET APPROVED
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98293 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

They never said the dossier was "factual and verified", in fact, they made a point to say it was oppo research



you have made such a fool of yourself
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

The problem is that the DOJ presented this to the FISA courts as the ONLY piece of evidence.
More ignorance
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74218 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:12 pm to
The FBI never said it was funded by the dems

Stop lying
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

in fact, they made a point to say it was oppo research

Don't you think it's important to include things such as Hillary paid for it, the dossier wasn't verified (even though they said it was through the Woods Procedures), Steele hated Trump and was desperate to have him not elected, Steele warning the FBI that everything was hearsay, Steele was also being paid by the FBI and a Russian Oligarch?

The FBI signed their names and swore before a judge that the info they were presenting was factual and true. It was not.

If you cared about the truth and justice, this would outrage you. But because it happened to the Orange man it was warranted.
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

More ignorance

Andrew McCabe: "Without the dossier there wouldn't have been a FISA warrant"

Please explain.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

The FBI never said it was funded by the dems
I didn't say they did

quote:

Stop lying
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Andrew McCabe: "Without the dossier there wouldn't have been a FISA warrant"
quote:

Please quote


Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
66703 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:15 pm to
Wow

Posted by the_watcher
Jarule's House
Member since Nov 2005
3451 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

More ignorance

Mother fricker enlighten us then. What else was used besides the “salacious and unverified” dossier? Clapper called it - A mosaic of facts or a corpus of intelligence. Comey called it - An articulable set of evidence. Care to explain that mosaic? Will anyone ever articulate any actual facts used to obtain the FISA?

Surely you can
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

The FBI never said it was funded by the dems

quote:

I didn't say they did


Ok. Thanks for proving everyone's point. It was not mentioned in the warrants at ALL

Don't you think it's important to let the judge know that the FAKE, UNVERIFIED info being presented to SPY on a Presidential campaign was funded by the opposing campaign??
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
23405 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:18 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/19/21 at 3:15 pm
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

The FBI signed their names and swore before a judge that the info they were presenting was factual and true. It was not.

Just quit saying that they stated the dossier was "factual and true" when they never said that and I won't need to correct your course
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram