- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Starbucks Sued by Employees Over Dress Code - The Cost of Becoming “Un-Woke”
Posted on 9/18/25 at 7:44 am to DingLeeBerry
Posted on 9/18/25 at 7:44 am to DingLeeBerry
Evil Starbucks making their employees dip into their tattoo / piercing / purple hair dye budget to purchase some decent clothes for work. 
0
Posted on 9/18/25 at 7:49 am to teke184
I would have done for him with my leatherman for 8
Posted on 9/18/25 at 7:52 am to DingLeeBerry
Can't the employees claim buying their work uniforms on their taxes? Problem solved. Now cover your pits and don't wear that bullshite makeup anymore. You chose to work for a corporation, not some mom & pop coffee shop. Get back to work bitch.
This post was edited on 9/18/25 at 7:53 am
Posted on 9/18/25 at 8:02 am to TechBullDawg
my first dress code was suit's monday thru thursday, you could wear slacks and a sport coat on friday, women could not wear slacks and weren't allowed to smoke at their desks.
and we liked it! this was 1984
and we liked it! this was 1984
Posted on 9/18/25 at 8:05 am to DingLeeBerry
shaking my head every last one of these nutz are probably glad KIRK was killed
Posted on 9/18/25 at 8:07 am to DingLeeBerry
Make a trip to Starbucks just so you can say, " Love the new uniforms."
Posted on 9/18/25 at 8:23 am to DingLeeBerry
Oh, so they can't afford a new tattoo or to get their hair dyed bright orange for a month?
The horror.
The horror.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 8:26 am to DingLeeBerry
quote:
“I think it’s extremely tone deaf on the company’s part to expect their employees to completely redesign their wardrobe without any compensation,” Allen said. “A lot of us are already living paycheck to paycheck.” Allen said she misses the old dress code, which allowed her to express herself with colorful shirts and three facial piercings. “It looks sad now that everyone is wearing black,” she said.
These people are destined for nothingness.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 8:31 am to DingLeeBerry
Clowns. Liberal clowns. We all have dress codes and those of us not coddled from birth pay for our own clothes. I guess I should have asked my boss to pay for my suits.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 8:32 am to Barneyrb
quote:
Those "baristas" should have to pony up for FR rated shirts and pants, they'd stop bitching
On Tuesday, I needed new boots.
I got a basic pair of Ariats, one FR shirt and one FR pair of pants.
$400 after taxes.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 8:35 am to DingLeeBerry
quote:
Starbucks’ new dress code went into effect on May 12. It requires all workers in North America to wear a solid black shirt with short or long sleeves under their green aprons. Shirts may or may not have collars, but they must cover the midriff and armpits. Employees must wear khaki, black or blue denim bottoms without patterns or frayed hems or solid black dresses that are not more than 4 inches above the knee
Isn't this how they have always dressed? I haven't been to a Starbucks in years, but it seems like this was always how they were dressed when I did go there.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 8:40 am to DingLeeBerry
quote:
but they must cover the midriff and armpits
Brooke Allen...
Now I know why they're changing things...
There are stereotypes for a reason...
Posted on 9/18/25 at 8:44 am to Tigergreg
quote:
Calling me a "partner" really makes me feel that I'm part of a team.
just say it with a country twang to remove the gayness.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 8:55 am to Wildcat1996
“must cover the midriff and armpits”
This must be a blessing for the ordinary people that walk in there
This must be a blessing for the ordinary people that walk in there
Posted on 9/18/25 at 8:59 am to DingLeeBerry
The real horror is a lawyer agreeing to take the case
Posted on 9/18/25 at 8:59 am to Nosevens
They should be thankful that is all that Starbucks required. They could have insisted that all employees wear Carhart Coveralls. Not those can get expensive.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 9:12 am to DingLeeBerry
Sandals are just a little too casual for food service safety.
Non-slip shoes are not $60.09.
Imagine suing your employer over a uniform/dress code. And then continuing to work there.
Non-slip shoes are not $60.09.
Imagine suing your employer over a uniform/dress code. And then continuing to work there.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 1:32 pm to TheGooner
quote:
I got a basic pair of Ariats, one FR shirt and one FR pair of pants.
Not to mention they feel like you're wearing a coat in the summer, bastards are some kind of hot
Posted on 9/18/25 at 1:34 pm to Barneyrb
Steel toe boots are required?
I'm suing!
I'm suing!
Posted on 9/18/25 at 1:36 pm to TechBullDawg
quote:
Steel toe boots are required?
Not for me, "non conductive safety toe" is what I have to wear
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News