- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Southern poverty law center indicted by grand jury. Laundered $ to white supremacy groups
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Jake, you claimed you read the indictment and it doesn’t mention anything about splc funding the activities, but this paragraph clearly shows money sent to an informant was used to buy kkk billboards
Also, it was funding individuals that it then *highlighted on its website* as people it was fighting and to please donate to assist in fighting the person
That violates numerous laws
Also, it was funding individuals that it then *highlighted on its website* as people it was fighting and to please donate to assist in fighting the person
That violates numerous laws
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Jesus H Christ.
Of everything to focus on. It’s an “on going investigation”.
Of everything to focus on. It’s an “on going investigation”.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The feds didn't charge them with theft. You realize this, right?
The feds identified that they committed theft. But this isn’t even the point.
God damn you for making me defend Patel, but you, the libertarian, are so desperate for attention that you’re trying to rationalize one of the most disgusting leftist orgs in the country (a govt-recognized non-profit, at that) paying people to commit crimes.
You lose.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
To steal from racist organization, yes. Is that your argument? You're upset they paid people to steal documents from some of the worst people on earth, in order to expose those worst people on earth?

Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:26 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Also, it was funding individuals that it then *highlighted on its website* as people it was fighting and to please donate to assist in fighting the person
I think the issue with the spin is that people are assuming because these people snitched for money they stopped being racists or supporters of the larger cause.
Think of this like the easiest comparison: infiltrating mob operations. Most of the guys who were informants and snitches were always pieces of shite during the whole process. They were also wanted by other authorities (the feds would step in to stop legitimate state prosecutions on occasion).
The fact the feds used this same process doesn't mean they were funding the mob, right? They were not criminals too right?
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:28 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:30 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
When the demand for racism outpaces the supply
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The fact the feds used this same process doesn't mean they were funding the mob, right? They were not criminals too right?
The SPLC isn’t the feds or even law enforcement you fricking clown
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I think the issue with the spin is that people are assuming because these people snitched for money they stopped being racists or supporters of the larger cause.
Did a freshman female humanities major write this? Holy shite
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:33 pm to texag7
I can break it down into smaller pieces if you're confused
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I think the issue with the spin is that people are assuming because these people snitched for money they stopped being racists or supporters of the larger cause.
Think of this like the easiest comparison: infiltrating mob operations. Most of the guys who were informants and snitches were always pieces of shite during the whole process. They were also wanted by other authorities (the feds would step in to stop legitimate state prosecutions on occasion).
The fact the feds used this same process doesn't mean they were funding the mob, right? They were not criminals too right?
1) you keep on saying these “informants” were legit extremists, but the indictment doesn’t say that.
2) if this was legit informant operations, why did the SPLC transfer their paychecks in an illegal manner?
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:36 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
1) you keep on saying these “informants” were legit extremists, but the indictment doesn’t say that.
If they were legit extremists, they wouldn't have been informing to the SPLC.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:38 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
If they were legit extremists, they wouldn't have been informing to the SPLC.
Proving my point in real time
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
The FBI paid CI’s to go out and commit crimes so they could pretend to arrest people?
Can you not see how your false equivalency is false?
Can you not see how your false equivalency is false?
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
Jake, this should spell it out in language you understand

Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:40 pm to Kjnstkmn
Dang. If you were to make Jon Hamm a little more portly and put him in a wrinkled white dress shirt, that meme would remind me of someone.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:41 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
you keep on saying these “informants” were legit extremists, but the indictment doesn’t say that.
What else would they be? Serious question
You think the SPLC planted them?
quote:
if this was legit informant operations, why did the SPLC transfer their paychecks in an illegal manner?
I think getting a payment directly traceable to the SPLC would be risky
These aren't the KKK chapter in Cameron
Now that scheme is the strongest argument for a crime, so it wasn't the smartest from the SPLCs perspective
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:42 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Oh yeah, this is what started the fine people Hoax.
All about Democrats not wanting to give up power.
All about Democrats not wanting to give up power.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You think the SPLC planted them?
Yes, J6 had plants too.
Also were the ones saying Kirk was a white supremacist.
Congrats, you've been duped like always.
This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 10:46 pm
Popular
Back to top



1







