- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/21/26 at 9:08 pm to Proximo
lol
Posted on 4/21/26 at 9:45 pm to Rebel
quote:
I know you can’t help but be contrary. If you want to be the akchully guy, ask why the indictment is coming out now vs waiting for the investigation to be complete. Why haven’t specific people been named in the indictment?
This is a good question, especially since the strongest cases are against individuals.
I have to imagine a large part of this being dropped now (unfinished?) is for PR. Just look at the spin with people trying to dishonestly argue Charlottesville was a complete "op" b/c of one informant. That sort of red meat seems to be the real goal.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 9:48 pm to G2160
quote:
Surprised to see SFP, the libertarian, has an opinion, and most of it is in favor of the SPLC
What?
What does being libertarian have to do with a private organization, and what did I say that "is in favor of the SPLC??
You're doing the weird mega dishonest internet move where if you don't fully promote the particular NPC narrative, the response says somehow you support the [insert example of out group]. Just because I'm not jumping on the silly PR spin doesn't mean I support the SPLC in any way, nor did any of my words support them in any way.
In fact, I said there is a strong case with the allegations involving banking activity, which is the opposite of "support".
Posted on 4/21/26 at 9:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
The rats will want to make a deal. How many other NGO’s and nonprofits had people inserted into Charlottesville?
And while the internet is focused on Charlottesville, Jan 6 is where the sedition is.
And while the internet is focused on Charlottesville, Jan 6 is where the sedition is.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 9:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
We all read what you wrote, clown.
The SPLC is an extreme left, garland-DOJ connected org.
No one is surprised you concluded that the allegations were “salacious”.
The SPLC is an extreme left, garland-DOJ connected org.
No one is surprised you concluded that the allegations were “salacious”.
This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 10:00 pm
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:00 pm to Rebel
quote:
The rats will want to make a deal. How many other NGO’s and nonprofits had people inserted into Charlottesville?
"Inserted" is a bit colorful. And does this SPLC story have more than one racist they paid for information?
quote:
And while the internet is focused on Charlottesville, Jan 6 is where the sedition is.
Those cases have been litigated to such an extent I have to imagine the SPLC's information, if any, was already given to prosecutors and in the hands of defendants. I wouldn't expect much from the SPLC there.
Take this from last page:
quote:
b. F-9 was affiliated with the neo-Nazi organization, the National Alliance and served as an F for the SPLC for more than 20 years. F-9's activities included fundraising for the National Alliance. Between 2014 and 2023, the SPLC secretly paid F-9 more than $1,000,000.00. In 2014, F-9 entered the headquarters of a violent extremist group and stole 25 boxes of their documents.
F-9 coordinated payment for the copying of the materials with a high-level
SPLC employee who had knowledge the documents had been stolen. The original stolen materials were returned to the violent extremist group in a second illegal entry by F-9. Thereafter, the high-level SPLC employee utilized the documents, in part, as the basis for a story published on the SPLC'S Hatewatch website and authored by the employee. Another F, F-39, was blamed for the theft and was paid approximately $6,000.00 by the SPLC to
falsely take responsibility for the theft.
People are trying to spin that into the SPLC "funding" the group, when it was just 2 snitches who permitted the SPLC to access tons of legitimate documents from the larger group. The fact they paid 2 snitches doesn't invalidate the larger group or its actions/beliefs, or, technically, the beliefs of the snitches.
Arguing this supports the organization is the same as arguing law enforcement funds organized criminal groups when they use snitches to get evidence. See how dumb that sounds with the same behavior in a different context?
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:00 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:01 pm to imjustafatkid
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:01 pm to G2160
quote:
We all read what you wrote, clown.
You didn't seem to read it well, or even at a 1st grade level. That's why I had to correct you so much with my last post.
quote:
The SPLC is an extreme left, DOJ connected org.
Sure. Changes nothing with what I said and your initial comments still lack any value.
quote:
No one is surprised you concluded that the allegations were “salacious”.
I was being kind with the language given the PR/echo chamber content spin, but of course you read what I wrote and understood it. Clearly.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
How about the SPLC paying F9 $1MM to (among other things) illegally enter and steal documents, and F39 $6k to take the fall?
This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 10:05 pm
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:05 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
Typical.
Leftists create a problem then they offer to clean it up for a price.
Jussie Smollett on steroids.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:06 pm to G2160
quote:
How about the SPLC paying F9 $1MM to illegally enter and steal documents, and F39 $6k to take the fall?
What about it?
Was it to acquire legitimate documentation of a legitimate hate group? Yes.
Did the SPLC use this information to write about and expos that group? Yes
What, exactly, is your argument? They paid 2 snitches within a larger, legitimately terrible organization, to get legitimate information in order to write about that group negatively. How are you trying to spin that, exactly?
This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What about it?
They paid people to commit crimes?
This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:08 pm to G2160
quote:
They paid people to commit crimes?
To steal from racist organization, yes.
Is that your argument? You're upset they paid people to steal documents from some of the worst people on earth, in order to expose those worst people on earth?
You think that's going to do what? Make people like the SPLC more? Show that they're exposing actual racism that exists? You think they should be brought on state charges for theft?
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
Charlottesville was fake and you’re still a dumbfrick
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:11 pm to texag7
quote:
Charlottesville was fake
You think because one guy (who likely was still legitimately part of a racist org) was a snitch the entire thing was fake?
You're going to new a few thousand more people to be exposed to start making that argument, b/c that's how many showed up for white nationalism.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
To steal from racist organization, yes. Is that your argument? You're upset they paid people to steal documents from some of the worst people on earth, in order to expose those worst people on earth?
Oh, well if they’re racist then no crimes were committed, I guess?
I mean you, the libertarian, should well understand that this was ok as long as it was against “those worst people on earth”?
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:15 pm to G2160
quote:
Oh, well if they’re racist then no crimes were committed, I guess?
The feds didn't charge them with theft. You realize this, right?
You've abandoned any defense of the actual indictment to rally around a minor charge against them that doesn't exist. Think about where you are, rhetorically.
quote:
I mean you, the libertarian, should well understand that this was ok as long as it was against “those worst people on earth”?
...and you sink even further here. I didn't think it was possible.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:19 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Page 8 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News