- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/6/23 at 6:39 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:When you are the highest court in your jurisdiction, your “opinion“ is something more than that.
All the court is saying is the unborn are not human beings with inalienable rights…..that’s literally their opinion and not fact.
It has the force of law.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 7:15 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
quote:All the court is saying is the unborn are not human beings with inalienable rights…..that’s literally their opinion and not fact.When you are the highest court in your jurisdiction, your “opinion“ is something more than that. It has the force of law.
Exactly! And that doesn't mean they are right, it means they are in a position of power and the worst thing that can happen to a civil society that seeks righteousness is to have unrighteous people in positions of power.
This post was edited on 1/6/23 at 7:26 pm
Posted on 1/6/23 at 7:25 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
I disagree with your position but you're fighting the good fight.
What’s the issue with my position? It’s my privacy what happens in my life.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 10:07 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Criminal codes do not confer rights. That is not why they exist. They exist to punish people
The law is a state action recognizing that the fetus is alive … hence manslaughter. If it isn’t alive the law cannot work.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 10:16 pm to dafif
No one said the fetus is not alive.
What an odd observation.
What an odd observation.
Posted on 1/7/23 at 8:13 am to SlowFlowPro
So that's a yes.
For the purpose of slow trying to defend this trash ruling , we have to discuss whether regulating medicine is constitutional?
I want your position before we start.
Either from a federal perspective or in the state of South Carolina , regulating medicine is constitutional. Yes or No?
For the purpose of slow trying to defend this trash ruling , we have to discuss whether regulating medicine is constitutional?
I want your position before we start.
Either from a federal perspective or in the state of South Carolina , regulating medicine is constitutional. Yes or No?
Posted on 1/7/23 at 8:17 am to mahdragonz
quote:
Sorry folks, abortion is here to stay and that includes your daughters and wives and mothers and ladies.
In trash states and where we have trash courts. So likely
Posted on 1/7/23 at 12:33 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
No one said the fetus is not alive.
Wait , you are telling everyone on this board that it is OK for the South Carolina Supreme Court to determine it is OK to kill a living human being just wow
This post was edited on 1/7/23 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 1/7/23 at 1:15 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
the worst thing that can happen to a civil society that seeks righteousness
If I’m righteous, why does it matter if the rest of the civil society is or not?
Posted on 1/8/23 at 8:16 am to dafif
quote:No, genius, I did not say any of that.quote:Wait , you are telling everyone on this board that it is OK for the South Carolina Supreme Court to determine it is OK to kill a living human being just wow
No one said the fetus is not alive.
I simply acknowledged that a fetus is a living organism.
Posted on 1/8/23 at 8:23 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I simply acknowledged that a fetus is a living organism.
You can go one step further and acknowledge it's a living human organism. It certainly isn't a bovine, canine or feline living organism. It's a human living organism; aka human life.
See? That wasn't too hard, was it? 
Posted on 1/8/23 at 10:27 am to Eurocat
Good, get government out of women's medical decisions and leave it to them and their doctors.
Posted on 1/8/23 at 10:29 am to FooManChoo
quote:
Absolutely evil. A right to privacy means privacy to kill your child?
The right for a woman to terminate a fetus yes. "Kill your child" is such unreasonably emotionally charged terms
Posted on 1/8/23 at 10:31 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:Emotional tantrums.quote:The right for a woman to terminate a fetus yes. "Kill your child" is such unreasonably emotionally charged terms
Absolutely evil. A right to privacy means privacy to kill your child?
Childish, but (sometimes) effective.
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News