- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So....recently I learned why "Remember the Alamo" is so important
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:17 pm to loogaroo
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:17 pm to loogaroo
quote:
To douche that downvoted...Show yourself, don't be a pussy!
My guess: TDS.
Texas (with or w/o A&M) Derangement Syndrome is a thing with some Ranters. You could post an article about Aggies saving drowning puppies and it would get downvoted by the LSUstephen17 types.
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:18 pm to AggieHank86
Because you obviously can't.
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:18 pm to SaintTiger1
Link to banned mlk books
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:20 pm to SaintTiger1
quote:
Now you repubs are banning books
Typical liberal bullshite and pushing a groomer agenda.
quote:
So, let’s get a few facts straight about what actually happened at Central.
The original book list, which was being considered for curriculum in August of last year, would have been approved without issue by Central’s board if it weren’t for a back-door, deceitful addendum. The original list included informative books for elementary readers about heroic Americans like Rosa Parks and Frederick Douglass. In contrast, the addendum to that list contained sexually explicit (some even pornographic) works, as well as hate filled, so called “anti-racist” selections that condemn “whiteness” and pit students against each other.
quote:
The mainstream media, salivating for an opportunity for division and strife, pushed the false claim that the books appearing in the first list had been banned by allegedly racist board members. This brings us to another critically important point. Diversity wasn’t the issue here. The issue was a deceptive attempt by a small faction of elitist educators, led by an equally elitist former superintendent, to incorporate heinous resources into an otherwise harmless roster of books. Fortunately, these educators don’t represent the district as a whole. Unfortunately, the media fell for it hook, line, and sinker and chose sensationalism over integrity in their journalism. To add insult to injury, these two lists were blended and edited after the fact, causing much confusion.
So, the school board, whose chief job is to decide curriculum, was faced with a decision: approve the list, including the obscene late additions, disapprove the list, or further investigate the add-ons.
frick you and your perverted agenda.
York Daily Record
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:20 pm to SaintTiger1
quote:could someone please tell him. It would not be nearly as funny, coming from me.
It's a political talk forum. I know you think that means only your side can make their one sided argument in every thread, but that is not normally how political forums are used.quote:
You clearly do not know how unintentionally funny this post is. Maybe someone else can tell you.quote:
Because you obviously can't.
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:21 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:22 pm to AggieHank86
Please someone. I could use the laugh.
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:22 pm to udtiger
San Antonio is a POS....you agree?
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:22 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
Link to banned mlk books
It is actually true, but they were pushing a set of books, not just MLK books, and the set was declined due to pornographic books included in the set.
This post was edited on 9/30/22 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:24 pm to phaz
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:25 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
AggieHank86
quote:
Joke from the wife, who is in construction.
What's his name?
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:25 pm to SaintTiger1
Weak shite.
One school board in York pa and a moms group that wants to ban the books. You said states. You lie.
Also, the one school board reversed that decision. Nice lies.
One school board in York pa and a moms group that wants to ban the books. You said states. You lie.
Also, the one school board reversed that decision. Nice lies.
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:27 pm to phaz
quote:
It is actually true
It’s not true in the way the poster described it. He said states. He didn’t produce one state banning mlk books.
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:28 pm to udtiger
quote:
We could sure use them today.
Most are hidden in the stuff.
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:28 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
It’squote:.
not true in the way the poster described it
That is basically what I said, read it
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:30 pm to SaintTiger1
quote:
But everyone is referencing the completely sanitized movies, so I'll go the opposite.
quote:
Still wonder why we can teach this in schools, but teach about MLK and omg time to ban books.
Ironic to see you bitch about history being sanitized and mention teaching about MLK. Outside of maybe George Floyd there's not another person in the past 60 years who has had his image more sanitized than MLK
This post was edited on 9/30/22 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:30 pm to phaz
I know what you said and I appreciate the added info, but I’m sticking to his argument that States banned MLK books. He lied
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:32 pm to SaintTiger1
quote:
SaintTiger1
quote:
Member since Dec 2019
37 posts
Posted on 9/30/22 at 3:33 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
I mean that moms for liberty group is pretty influential in the repub party. Lets not pretend it's just some mom group.
And thank god they reversed it, and it wasn't one state. Again just use a search engine.
And thank god they reversed it, and it wasn't one state. Again just use a search engine.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News