Started By
Message

re: Sombrero Jeffries says Trump admin & Mike Johnson are running a pedo protection program

Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:23 pm to
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
27549 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Jeffries says Trump admin & Mike Johnson are running a pedo protection program

The Trump administration has been very open about the fact that it will do whatever it can to cover up the Epstein sex trafficking and pedo abuse ring. The cover up has been very public.
Posted by Jimmyboy
Member since May 2025
1994 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:28 pm to
I hate this Jeffries guy so much. Ever since his ghay little rant that lasted like 2 days I knew this guy was a jabroni
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
9631 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:32 pm to
A certain prominent black Louisiana Democrat about 15 years ago was allegedly banging multiple underage girls (like 15 y.o.) over the years in New Orleans. Two very liberal black girls I went to law school with alleged this and they hated that MF. They said it was known, and that he put his dick in anything that moved. Jeffries and him are good buddies.
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
24717 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:34 pm to
When are people going to start doing something a bout the obvious defamatory lies? Free speech os free speech, but you still can't accuse people of shite like that.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
86062 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:39 pm to
It's because its bullshite.


The most likely thing that happened is some older dudes thought they were getting with an 18-19 year old prostitute and they were 17 instead.


quote:

likely involvement in intelligence community stuff


Or it's not what you think. I haven't seen any proof or heard testimony from anyone who was a prepubescent child. The ones we know about were aged 16-20. Which is legal in most countries.





This post was edited on 11/3/25 at 4:43 pm
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
86062 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

The Trump administration has been very open about the fact that it will do whatever it can to cover up the Epstein sex trafficking and pedo abuse ring. The cover up has been very public.


Only if democrats would have said something months ago.


Trump wouldn't be president and your queen would be.


Too bad you guys waited until now.
This post was edited on 11/3/25 at 4:41 pm
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84712 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:43 pm to
Hey retard what did the Dems and the Turnip do for the four years he was napping in the White House?
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
2377 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

The Trump administration has been very open about the fact that it will do whatever it can to cover up the Epstein sex trafficking and pedo abuse ring. The cover up has been very public.


You voted for a guy whose own daughter admitted he molested her in the shower until she was a teenager.

Why didn't your pedophile hero release this when he was "in charge" for the last four years?

It is OK, this is a rhetorical question and I am asking a known liar that openly supports child grooming.
Posted by slidingstop
Member since Jan 2025
1727 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:47 pm to
Hakeem sounds desperate.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
9631 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

I don't know about a program, but they are definitely protecting the Epstein files because he was an intelligence agency asset for Mossad, a


And the CIA.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
37839 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 5:22 pm to
quote:


And the CIA.


Posted by Lighteningbolt
Member since Oct 2025
229 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 5:28 pm to
Just curious to know why this board thinks Trump has refused to do as promised in releasing Epstein information?
Posted by This GUN for HIRE
Member since May 2022
5590 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 7:00 pm to
When did Trump make this promise? Is there a video of it? Do you have a link? If you could provide that please, much obliged
Posted by YumYum Sauce
Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
9385 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 7:04 pm to
I wouldn't swear someone in with that name.
Posted by Stonehenge
Wakulla Springs
Member since Dec 2014
2523 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 7:05 pm to
Jeffries is correct.
Posted by OSqueal
Member since Jan 2011
5966 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 7:06 pm to
Wouldn't that be grounds for defamation?
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
17792 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 7:20 pm to
I do believe it has everything to do with the possessor being able to use the Epstein info for their own persuasive power or gotcha moments.

Bill Clinton Comes Clean.

Posted by Apache
San Diego
Member since Dec 2013
2746 posts
Posted on 11/3/25 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

Wouldn't that be grounds for defamation?

Since Trump and Johnson are actively protecting the pedophiles on the Epstein list, my guess would be no.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram